Skip to main content
Log in

Computers and a normative model of the policy process

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper begins with a simple normative model of the policy process in terms of the information and authority relationships and flows required to meet two assumed criteria: those of democracy (informed citizen participation) and intelligence (anticipation and learning). The model contains four actors: elite, public, anticipatory unit, and monitoring unit. The paper continues with a descriptive summary of the major characteristics of the four actors which work against the realization of the information and authority connections which our criteria require. The final section suggests general ways in which computers, especially interactive computing using graphics, can lessen the force of the inhibiting characteristics The general suggestions are supplemented by three illustrative applications: inductive data analysis (IDEA), mapping the urban system (the Kankakee project), and eliciting and enriching citizen preferences (the Smithsonian and the PLATO projects).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lerner, Daniel, and Harold D. Lasswell, eds., The Policy Sciences. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Univ. Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dror, Yehezkel, Public Policymaking Reexamined. San Francisco: Chandler, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer, Raymond A., and Kenneth J. Gergen, eds., The Study of Policy Formation. Free Press, 1968.

  4. Quade, E. S., and W. I. Boucher, eds. Systems Analysis and Policy Planning. New York: American Elsevier, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wilensky, Harold L., Organizational Intelligence, pp. 94–109. New York: Basic Books, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cyert, Richard M., and James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  7. March, James, and Herbert Simon, Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson, Victor A., Modern Organization. New York: Knopf, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Simon, Herbert A., Administrative Behavior. New York: Macmillan, 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Simon, Herbert A., Models of Man. New York: Wiley, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Webb, Eugene J., Individual and Organizational Forces Influencing the Interpretation of Social and Political Indicators, Institute for Defense Analyses Research Paper P-488, April, 1969.

  12. Bobrow, Davis B., “International Indicators,” Paper presented at the 1969 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Commodore Hotel, New York City, 2–6 Sept. 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenthal, Robert A., and Robert S. Weiss, “Problems of Organizational Feedback Processes,” in Raymond A. Bauer, ed., Social Indicators, pp. 302–340. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Riker, Theodore, The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univ. Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Deutsch, Karl W., and Richard L. Merritt, “Effects of Events on National and International Images,” in Herbert C. Kelman, ed., International Behavior, pp. 130–187. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bobrow, Davis B., “Organization of American National Security Opinions,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 33 (1969), 223–239.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Converse, Philip E., “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics,” in David Apter, ed., Ideology and Discontent, pp. 206–216. New York: Free Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bobrow, Davis B., and Judah L. Schwartz, eds., Computers and the Policy-Making Community. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chavchanidze, Vladimir, “Induction of Psychointellectual Activity in Long-Term Forecasting and Planning of Research,” Technological Forecasting, 1 (Fall 1969), 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Miller, James R., On-Line Analysis for Social Scientists, Project MAC TR-40. M.I.T., Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T., Press, May 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Popper, Karl R., The Poverty of Historicism, pp. 42–45. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zeckhauser, Richard, and Elmer Schaefer, “Public Policy and Normative Economic Theory,” in Bauer and Gergen, eds., The Study of Policy Formation, pp. 67–68.

  23. Press, Laurence I., Miles S. Rogers, and Gerald H. Shure, “An Interactive Technique for the Analysis of Multivariate Data,” Behavioral Science, 14 (1969), 364–370.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kadanoff, L. P., J. R. Voss, and W. J. Bouknight, “A City Grows Before Your Eyes,” Computer Decisions, 1 (1969), 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bouknight, W. J., L. P. Kadanoff, and J. R. Voss, “The Use of Computers in an Interactive Mode for the Display and Analysis of Urban Information Through Time and Space,” mimeographed, n.d.

  26. Compton, W. D., and J. R. Voss, “Interactive Computer Display System,” mimeographed, n.d.

  27. Umpleby, Stuart, Citizen Sampling Simulations: A Method for Involving the Public in Social Planning, Computer-based Education Research Laboratory, Univ. of Illinois. 15 Dec. 1969.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bobrow, D.B. Computers and a normative model of the policy process. Policy Sci 1, 123–134 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145197

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145197

Keywords

Navigation