Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the homogeneity of psychological processes

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blomkvist, A.-C. (1977). “Antonym and unrelatedness in multidimensional similarity scaling”, Göteborg Psychological Reports 7, No. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, K.S. (1973). “Situationism in psychology: an analysis and critique”, Psychological Review 80: 307–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratfisch, O. (1971). “A further study on subjective and objective intelligence factors”. Reports from the Institute of Applied Psychology, University of Stockholm, No. 20.

  • Bratfisch, O. and Ekman, G. (1969). “Subjective and objective intelligence factors”, Psychological Reports 25: 607–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments. 2nd edn. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, N. (1968). “Adjective check list responses and individual differences in perceived meaning”, Educational and Psychological Measurement 28: 1063–1077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, N. (1969). “Liking judgments and multidimensional scaling”, Educational and Psychological Measurement 29: 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, N., Bradley, P. and Girard, R. (1973). “The investigation of cognitive models for inventory response”, Multivariate Behavioral Research 8: 407–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, N. and Young, F.W. (1968). “On the relation between unidimensional judgments and multidimensional scaling”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 3: 269–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, H. and Roskam, E.E. (1977). “Multidimensional similarity: an experimental and theoretical comparison of vector, distance, and set theoretical models. I. Models and internal consistency of data”, Acta Psychologica 41: 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekehammar, B. and Sidanius, J. (1979). “Political perception dimensions based on negative similarities”, Perceptual and Motor Skills 49: 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fhanér, G. and Hane, M. (1973). “Seat belts: changing usage by changing beliefs”. The Swedish Road Safety Office, Driver Licence and Research Departments, Report No. 26.

  • Foa, U.G. (1965). “New developments in facet design and analysis”, Psychological Review 72: 262–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, U.G. (1968). “Three kinds of behavioral changes”, Psychological Bulletin 70: 460–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J.P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, U. and Devine, B. (1975). “Negative similarities”, Educational and Psychological Measurement 35: 797–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, D. and Ekman, G. (1970). “A psychophysical approach to the study of personality traits”, Multivariate Behavioral Research 5: 255–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1973). “Multivariate models of cognition and personality: the need for both process and structure in psychological theory and measurement”, in J.R., Royce, ed., Multivariate Analysis and Psychological Theory, London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1973). “Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality”, Psychological Review 80: 252–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, S.A. (1964). “Are personality factors raters' conceptual factors?”, Journal of Consulting Psychology 28: 506–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. (1968a). “The dimensionality paradox in comparative judgment: a resolution”, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 9: 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. (1968b). “Unidimensional scaling of multidimensional facial expressions”, Journal of Experimental Psychology 78: 429–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. (1969). “The dimensionality of similarity judgments”, American Journal of Psychology 82: 441–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. (1971). “Measurement of individual treatment effects”, Göteborg Psychological Reports 1, No. 4.

  • Sjöberg, L. (1975). “Uncertainty of comparative judgments and multidimensional structure”, Multivariate Behavioral Research 10: 207–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. (1977). “Choice frequency and similarity”, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 18: 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. (1979). “Diagnosticy and social desirability of behavioral critera as predictors of attitude-behavior correlation”, Göteborg Psychological Reports 9, No. 5.

  • Sjöberg, L. (1980). “Similarity and correlation”, in E.-D. Lantermann and H. Feger, eds., Similarity and Choice. Bern: Huber, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. and Capozza, D. (1975). “Preference and cognitive structure of Italian political parties”, Italian Journal of Psychology 2: 391–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. and Holley, J.W. (1967). “A measure of similarity between individuals when scoring-directions of variables are arbitrary”, Multivariate Behavioral Research 2: 377–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenson, O. (1980). “Decision rules and information processing in decision making”, in L. Sjöberg, T. Tyszka and J. Wise, eds., Human Decision Making. Vol. II. Decision Processes. Lund, Sweden: Doxa, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, E. (1977). “Response format and factor structure in mood adjective check lists”, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 18: 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Göteborg, Sweden

    Lennart Sjöberg

Authors
  1. Lennart Sjöberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sjöberg, L. On the homogeneity of psychological processes. Qual Quant 15, 17–30 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00144299

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00144299

Keywords

Search

Navigation