Skip to main content
Log in

A defense of David Kitts

  • Discussions
  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Hull, David L.: 1965, ‘The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy — Two Thousand Years of Stasis (1)’, Brit. Jl. Phil. Sci.XV, 2–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitts, D. B.: 1987, ‘Plato on Kinds of Animals’, Biology and Philosophy 2, 315–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1982, The Growth of Biological Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1988, ‘A Response to David Kitts’, Biology and Philosophy 3, 97–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrin, Pierre: 1985, Aristotle: A Zoology without Species, in Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things, Mathesis Publications, Pittsburgh and Bristol Classical Press, Bristol, England, pp. 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrin, Pierre: 1986, Aristotle's Classification of Animals: Biology and the Conceptual Unity of the Aristotelian Corpus, transl. A. Preus, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1943, The Open Society and Its Enemies. 1. The Spell of Plato Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grene, M. A defense of David Kitts. Biol Philos 4, 69–72 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00144040

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00144040

Navigation