The relevance of the voting paradox: a restatement

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

DeMeyer, E. and Plott, C.R. (1970). “The probability of a cyclical majority”, Econometrica 38: 345–354.
Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Google Scholar
Frey, B.S. (1970). “Models of perfect competition and pure democracy”, Kyklos 23: 736–755.
Google Scholar
Gaertner, W. (1977). “Zum Problem der Existenz von Sozialen Wohlfahrtsfunktionen im Sinne von Arrow”, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 133: 61–74.
Google Scholar
Garman, M.B. and Kamien, I.M. (1968). “The paradox of voting: some probability calculation”, Behavioral Science 13: 306–316.
Google Scholar
Gleser, L.J. (1969). “The paradox of voting: some probabilistic results”, Public Choice 7: 47–63.
Google Scholar
Holler, M.J. (1980). “What is paradoxical about the voting paradox?”, Quality and Quantity 14: 679–685.
Google Scholar
Tullock, G. (1967). “The general irrelevance of the general impossibility theorem”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 81: 256–270.
Google Scholar

Seminar for Mathematical Economics, Economic Institute of the University of Munich, Ludwigstrasse 28, 8000, München 22, W. Germany
Manfred J. Holler

Authors

Manfred J. Holler
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Holler, M.J. The relevance of the voting paradox: a restatement. Qual Quant 16, 43–53 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143819

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.