Skip to main content
Log in

Self-directed student groups and college learning

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies conducted by the author are reported in which small self-directed groups of college students assumed the major responsibility for their learning in college courses. Other similar studies are reported and summarized. These studies all indicate that self-directed small group study does not result in any decrement in subject matter mastery in the college learning experience. Furthermore, a number of measurable benefits appear in terms of other desirable outcomes of the overall small-group experience. Such educational outcomes as interest in reading material related to the course and its assignments, quantity and quality of study invested in the courses, increased communicative and interpersonal skills, sense of responsibility for one's own growth and learning, greater enthusiasm for the small-group experience, improvement in critical thinking, greater awareness of applications of study material, and lasting curiosity aroused by the learning, all appear persistently in favor of the self-directed student groups. Observations of self-directed groups in action and some implications for policy decisions in higher education are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baskin, S. (1965). Higher Education: Some Newer Developments. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, L. R. (1960). “Sociability and Academic Achievement in Various Types of Learning Situations,” J. Educ. Psychol., 51: 208–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, L. R. (1968a). “The Learning Process in Self-Directed Groups,” Improving College and University Teaching, 16: 93–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, L. R. (1968b). “Learning and Student Interaction in Small Self-Directed College Groups,” Final Report, Project No. 7-E-020, U.S. Office of Education. (Available from the author).

  • Birney, R. and W. J. McKeachie. (1955). “The Teaching of Psychology: a Survey of Research since 1942,” Psychol. Bull., 5: 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, R. and Taveggia, T. C. (1968). The Teaching-Learning Paradox: a Comparative Analysis of College Teaching Methods. Eugene, Oregon: Center for the Advanced Study of Educational Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E. and Weitman, M. (1962). “Self-directed Study: Experiments in Higher Education,” University of Colorado Behavior Research Laboratory Report No. 19. (April).

  • Hovey, D. E., Gruber, H. E. and Terrell, G. (1963). “Effects of Self-directed Study on Course Achievement, Retention and Curiosity,” J. Educ. Res., 56: 346–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuba, C. (1964). “Using Groups in Independent Study,” Improving College and University Teaching, 12: 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, J. A. (1955). “A Study of the Effects of Student Acceptance of Responsibility and Motivation on Course Behavior.” Doctor's thesis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G. (1953). “An Evaluation of Small Group Work in a Large Class,” J. Educ. Psychol., 44: 385–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N.J. and Grib, T. F. (1967). Teaching Process as a Learning Experience: the Experimental Use of Student-led Discussion Groups. West De Pere, Wisc.: St. Norbert College.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beach, L.R. Self-directed student groups and college learning. High Educ 3, 187–200 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143791

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143791

Keywords

Navigation