Skip to main content
Log in

Precedence, privilege, preferences, plus Pareto principle: Some examples on egalitarian ethics and economic efficiency

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is demonstrated how economic theory of justice as fairness, Pareto improvements on situations involving equity, can be used to analyze the ethics contents of distributions of rights and privileges. The analysis makes use of the concept of a veil of ignorance to define a status quo. A property right to an ability or a privilege is interpreted as a transparency in the veil in respect to this ability or privilege. Three different examples are investigated, focusing on rights as collective goods, non-transferable abilities, and privileges as inherent rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buchanan, J.M. (1987). The constitution of economic policy. American Economic Review 77: 243–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. and Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (1981a). What is equality? Part 1: Equality of welfare. Philosophy and Public Affairs 10: 185–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (1981b). What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resources. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 10: 283–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, D. (1967). Resource allocation in the public sector. Yale Economic Essays 7: 73–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D.C., Tollison, R.D. and Willett, T.D. (1974). The utilitarian contract: A generalization of Rawls' Theory of justice. Theory and Decision 4: 345–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazner, E.A. (1976). Recent thinking on economic justice. Journal of Peace Science 2: 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazner, E.A. and Schmeidler, D. (1976). Social contract theory and ordinal distributive equity. Journal of Public Economics 5: 261–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (ca. — 395). Κϱίτων. (See, for instance, edition by J. Adam, 1888, revised and reprinted 1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.)

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J.E. (1985). Equality of talent. Economics and Philosophy 1: 151–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J.E. (1986). Equality of resources implies equality of welfare. Quarterly Journal of Economics 101: 751–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1970). The impossibility of a Paretian liberal. Journal of Political Economy 78: 152–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H.R. (1975). Distributive justice, welfare economics and the theory of fairness. Philosophy and Public Affairs 4: 223–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H.R. (1980). Redistributive taxation as social insurance. Journal of Public Economics 14: 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicksell, K. (1896). Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen. Jena: Gustav Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickström, B.-A. (1988). Ekonomiaj teorioj pri justeco. Scienca Revuo 39: 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickström, B.-A. (1990). Rights and economic justice. Arbeitspapier Nr. 9022, Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Johannes-Kepler-Universität, Linz.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Revised version of Presidential address to the annual meeting of the European Public-Choice Society in Linz, Austria, 29 March to 1 April, 1989. I thank Johann K. Brunner, Josef Falkinger, and Björn Sandvik for many helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wickström, B.A. Precedence, privilege, preferences, plus Pareto principle: Some examples on egalitarian ethics and economic efficiency. Public Choice 73, 101–115 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142919

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142919

Keywords

Navigation