Abstract
This essay describes conversation as an ensemble accomplishment that can be illuminated by critics working with specific texts within a rhetorical framework. We first establish dialogue as the key concept for any criticism of conversation, specifying the rhetorical dimensions of interpersonal dialogue. Second, we show how template thinking is particularly dangerous for conversational critics and suggest a research (anti)method, based on a coauthorship, that provides a thoroughgoing dialogical access to texts. Finally, we exemplify dialogic criticism of a conversational text by analyzing the famous 1957 dialogue of philosopher Martin Buber and psychologist Carl Rogers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, R. (1982). Phenomenological dialogue, humanistic psychology and pseudo-walls: A response and extension. Western Journal of Speech Communication 46(4): 344–357.
Anderson, R., Cissna, K.N. and Arnett, R.C. (Eds). (1994). The reach of dialogue: Confirmation, voice, and community. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Arnett, R.C. (1981). Toward a phenomenological dialogue. Western Journal of Speech Communication 45(3): 201–212.
Arnett, R.C. (1986). Communication and community: Implications of Martin Buber's dialogue. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Arnett, R.C. (1989). What is dialogic communication?: Friedman's contribution and clarification. Person-Centered Review 4(1): 42–60.
Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. (Trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M.M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. (Trans. V W. McGee). Eds. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M.M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act. (Trans. V Liapunov). Eds. V. Liapunov and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Baldwin, D. (1957a). Baldwin to Buber, 8 April 1957, Washington, D.C. Unpublished letter from Martin Buber Archives, Jewish National & University Library, Arc. Ms. Var., 350/836d:8.
Baldwin, D. (1957b). Baldwin to Rogers, 8 April 1957, Chicago. Unpublished letter from The Carl R. Rogers Collection, Collections of the Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, DC (box 80, folder 13).
Bateson, G. (1951). Information and codification: A philosophical approach. In J. Ruesch and G. Bateson, Communication: The social matrix of psychiatry. New York:Norton.
Brace, K. (1992). I and Thou in interpersonal psychotherapy. The Humanistic Psychologist 20(1): 41–57.
Brink, D.D. (1987). The issues of equality and control in the client- or person-centered approach. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 27(1): 27–37.
Brown, R.H. (1987). Society as text: Essays on rhetoric, reason, and reality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Buber, M. (1954). Elemente des Zwischenmenschlichen. Neue Schweitzer Rundschau (Zurich) 21: 593–608.
Buber, M. (1957). Elements of the interhuman. Psychiatry 20: 105–113.
Buber, M. (1965a). Between man and man. (Trans. R.G. Smith). New York: Macmillan.
Buber, M. (1965b). The knowledge of man: A philosophy of the interhuman. Ed. M. Friedman. New York: Harper & Row.
Burstow, B. (1987). Humanistic psychotherapy and the issue of equality. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 27(1): 9–25.
Cissna, K.N. and Anderson, R. (1990). The contributions of Carl R. Rogers to a philosophical praxis of dialogue. Western Journal of Speech Communication 54(2): 125–147.
Cissna, K.N. and Anderson, R. (1994). The 1957 Martin Buber-Carl Rogers dialogue, as dialogue. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 34(1): 11–45.
Cissna, K.N. and Anderson, R. (in press). Dialogue in public: Looking critically at the Buber-Rogers dialogue. In M. Friedman (Ed.), Martin Buber and the human sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Clark, K. and Holquist, M. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Crapanzano, V (1992). Hermes' dilemma and Hamlet's desire: On the epistemology of interpretation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dascal, M. (Ed.). (1985). Dialogue: An interdisciplinary approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dialogue between Martin Buber and Carl Rogers (1960). Psychologia 3(4) : 208–221.
Denzin, N.K. (1992). Symbolic interactionism and cultural studies: The politics of interpretation. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York: Holt.
Farrell, T.B. (1983). Aspects of coherence in conversation and rhetoric. In R.T. Craig and K. Tracy (Eds.), Conversational coherence: Form, structure, and strategy. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Foss, K.A. and Foss, S.K. (1991). Women speak: The eloquence of women's lives. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
Friedman, M. (Ed.). (1964). The worlds of existentialism: A critical reader. New York: Random House.
Friedman, M.S. (1983). Martin Buber's life and work: The later years — 1945–1965. New York: E P. Dutton.
Friedman, M.S. (1986). Carl Rogers and Martin Buber: Self-actualization and dialogue. Person-Centered Review 1(4): 409–435.
Friedman, M.S. (1987). Reminiscences of Carl Rogers. Person-Centered Review 2(3): 392–395.
Friedman, M.S. (1991). Encounter on the narrow ridge: A life ofMartin Buber. New York: Paragon House.
Friedman, M.S. (1994). Reflections on the Buber-Rogers dialogue. Joumal of Humanistic Psychology 34(1): 46–65.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1976). Philosophical hermeneutics. (Trans. D.E. Linge.) Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1982). Truth and method. (Trans. G. Barden and J. Cumming.) New York: Crossroad Publishing.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1989). Text and interpretation. (Trans. D.J. Schmidt and R. Palmer.) In D.P. Michelfelder and R.E. Palmer (Eds.), Dialogue and deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida encounter. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Glaser, S.R. and Frank, D.A. (1982). Rhetorical criticism of interpersonal discourse: An exploratory study. Communication Quarterly 30(4): 353–358.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goodall, H.L., Jr. (1991). Living in the rock n roll mystery: Reading context, self, and others as clues. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Greatbatch, D. (1988). A turn-taking system for British news interviews. Language in Society 17(3): 401–430.
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Volume 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.
Haley, J. (1963). Strategies of psychotherapy. New York: Grune and Stratton.
Halling, S. and Leifer, M. (1991). The theory and practice of dialogal research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 22: 1–15.
Hart, R.P. (1986). Contemporary scholarship in public address: A research editorial. Western Journal of Speech Communication 50(3): 283–295.
Heritage, J. (1985). Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In T.A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis, Volume 3: Discourse and dialogue. London: Academic Press.
Hodes, A. (1971). Martin Buber: An intimate portrait. New York: Viking Press.
Holquist, M. (1990). Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world. London: Routledge.
Jorgensen, J. (1992). Communication, rapport, and the interview: A social perspective. Communication Theory 2(2): 148–156.
Kirschenbaum, H. and Henderson, V L. (Eds). (1989). Carl Rogers: Dialogues — Conversations with Martin Buber Paul Tillich, B.F. Skinner, Gregory Bateson, Michael Polanyi, Rollo May, and others. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Lannamann, J.W. (1992). Deconstructing the person and changing the subject of interpersonal studies. Communication Theory 2(2): 139–148.
Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (1992). Social approaches to interpersonal communication. Communication Theory 2(2): 131–139.
Maranhao, T. (Ed.). (1990). The interpretation of dialogue. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McLaughlin, M.L. (1984). Conversation: How talk is organized. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mishler, E.G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Morson, G. S. and Emerson, C. (1990). Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a prosaics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Nofsinger, R.E. (1991). Everyday conversation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ong, W.J. (1967). The presence of the word: Some prolegomena for cultural and religious history. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Ong, W.J. (1977). Interfaces of the word: Studies in the evolution of consciousness and culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Ong, W.J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.
Palmer, R.E. (1969). Hermeneutics. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Peterson, J.D. (1976). Carl Rogers and his ways of being in interpersonal relationships. Master's thesis, Kansas School of Religion and University of Kansas.
Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. New York: Penguin Books.
Riegel, K.F. (1979). Foundations of dialectical psychology. New York: Academic Press.
Roffey, J.W. (1980). A hermeneutic critique of counseling psychology: Ricoeur and Rogers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky.
Rogers, C.R. (1957). “Questions not used.” Unpublished notes from the Carl R. Rogers Collection, Collections of the Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. (Box 80, folder 13).
Rogers, C.R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (vol. 3), Formulations of the person and social context. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rogers, C.R. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Rogers, C.R. (1980). A way of being. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Rosenfield, L.W. (1974). The experience of criticism. Quarterly Journal of Speech 60(4): 489–496.
Schultz, E.A. (1990). Dialogue at the margins: Whorf Bakhtin, and linguistic relativity. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Schrag, C.O. (1986). Communicative praxis and the space of subjectivity. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
Seckinger, D. S. (1976). The Buber-Rogers dialogue: Theory confirmed in experience. Journal of Thought 11(2):143–149.
Sharf, B.F. (1979). Rhetorical analysis of nonpublic discourse. Communication Quarterly 27(3): 21–30.
Simons, H.W. (Ed.). (1990). The rhetorical turn: Invention and persuasion in the conduct of inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Smith, C.R. and Douglas, D.G. (1973). Philosophical principles in the traditional and emerging views of rhetoric. In D.G. Douglas (Ed.), Philosophers on rhetoric: Traditional and emerging views. Skokie, IL: National Textbook Company.
Stewart, J. (1985). Martin Buber's central insight: Implications for his philosophy of dialogue. In M. Dascal (Ed.), Dialogue: An interdisciplinary approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tedlock, D. (1983). The spoken word and the work of interpretation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Thorne, B. (1992). Carl Rogers. London: Sage.
Todorov, T. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin: The dialogical principle. (Trans. W. Godzich). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Tyler, S.A. (1987). The unspeakable: Discourse, dialogue, and rhetoric in the postmodern world. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Van Balen, R. (1990). The therapeutic relationship according to Carl Rogers: Only a climate? A dialogue? Or both? In G. Lietaer, J. Rombauts and R. Van Balen (Eds.), Client-centered and experiential psychotherapy in the nineties. Louvain, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
Warnke, G. (1987). Gadamer: Hermeneutics, tradition, and reason. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J.H. and Jackson, D.D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. New York: Norton.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Portions of this essay were first developed in a presentation to the international interdisciplinary conference on “Martin Buber: His Impact on the Human Sciences,” San Diego State University, in October, 1991. A version of the present essay was presented at the Central States Communication Association and Southern States Communication Association Joint Conference, Lexington, Kentucky, in April, 1993. We acknowledge gratefully the assistance of Professor John Stewart in providing a copy of the audiotape of the Buber-Rogers dialogue, and also appreciate the assistance of Professor Maurice Friedman who, through interview and correspondence, shared his impressions of the event and helped us refine our analysis. We note that he disagrees strongly with us on several matters of interpretation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, R., Cissna, K.N. Criticism and conversational texts: rhetorical bases of role, audience, and style in the Buber-Rogers dialogue. Hum Stud 19, 85–118 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142857
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142857