Conclusion
The conclusion we draw from our extended discussion of the interesting descriptive problem Hetzron provides is that Somali offers no support to the view his paper defended: that syntax and phonology are partially intermingled domains. Merely letting the agreement rules of Somali have access to phonological properties of morphemes would not, in any case, suffice for the statement Hetzron would like to make; as we have seen, no phonological properties of the relevant strings can be used to predict the occurrence of ‘playful agreement’; Hetzron does not even sketch a grammar-fragment that would achieve such prediction, and apparently this could not be done. An adequate account needs morphological features, and this does not need to make reference to phonology. Hetzron's point about the ‘playful’ character of the agreement possibilities with sub-plurals should really have been presented as a hypothesis about the historical development of Somali — a study of psychophonetic factors in syntactic change. It is crucial, however, to see that this is not the same as a hypothesis about the grammar of Somali. Speakers may be influenced by the sound of the sentences in their language when they go along with a tendency that leads to a change in the grammar; but that does not mean that syntactic rules in the grammar of a language can have phonological conditions. We claim, in fact, that in no language does any syntactic rule show sensitivity to phonological properties.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abraham, R. G.: 1964, Somali-English Dictionary, Univ. of London Press, London.
Anderson, Stephen R.: 1982, ‘Where's Morphology?’ Linguistic Inquiry 13, 4, 571–612.
Andrzejewski, B. W.: 1964, The Declensions of Somali Nouns, School of Oriental and African Studies, Univ. of London.
Armstrong, Lilias E.: 1934, The Phonetic Structure of Somali, Berlin. Republished 1964, Gregg Press, Ridgewood, NJ.
Babby, Leonard H.: 1980, ‘The Syntax of Surface Case Marking’, Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 1.1.32.
Bever, Thomas G.: 1970, ‘The Cognitive Basis for Linguistic Structures’, in John R. Hayes (ed.), Cognition and the Development of Language, Wiley, New York; pp. 279–362.
Bierwisch, Manfred: 1967, ‘Syntactic Features in Morphology: General Problems of So-called Pronominal Inflection in German’, in To Honor Roman Jakobson I, Mouton, The Hague; pp. 239–70.
Cena, R. M.: 1978, When Is a Phonological Generalization Psychologically Real? IULC Bloomington, IN.
Cutler, Anne: 1979, ‘The Psychological Reality of Word Formation and Lexical Stress Rules,’ Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Phonetics, Copenhagen, 1979: Vol. II, Institute of Phonetics, pp. 79–85, Copenhagen.
Gazdar, Gerald and Geoffrey K. Pullum: 1982, Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar: A Theoretical Synopsis, IULC, Bloomington, IN.
Grosu, Alexander: 1972, ‘The Strategic Content of Island Constraints,’ Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 13.
: 1981, Approaches to Island Phenomena, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Hankamer, Jorge: 1972, ‘Analogical Rules in Syntax,’ Papers from the Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society 8.111–23.
Hetzron, Robert: 1972, ‘Phonology in Syntax’, Journal of Linguistics 8.251–65.
Hyman, Larry M.: 1981, ‘Tonal Accent in Somali’, Studies in African Linguistics 12, 169–203.
Kiparsky, Paul: 1968, ‘Linguistic Universals and Linguistic Change’, in Emmon Bach and Robert Harms (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 171–202.
: 1975, ‘What Are Phonological Theories About?’ in David Cohen and Jessica R. Wirth (eds.), Testing Linguistic Hypotheses, Hemisphere Publishing Co., Washington; pp. 187–209.
Koutsoudas, Andreas, Gerald Sanders, and Craig Noll: 1974, ‘The Application of Phonological Rules’, Language 50, 1–28.
Lapointe, Steven G.: 1980, A Theory of Grammatical Agreement, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Massachusetts.
Lieber, Rochelle: 1981, On the Organization of the Lexicon, IULC, reporudction of MIT Ph.D. dissertation.
Rhodes, Richard A.: 1976, The Morphosyntax of the Central Ojibwa Verb, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Michigan.
Rivero, María-Luisa and Douglas C. Walker: 1976, ‘Surface Structure and the Centrality of Syntax’, Theoretical Linguistics 3, 99–124.
Vanek, Anthony L.: 1977, Aspects of Subject Verb Agreement, Linguistic Research, Inc., Alberta. Edmonton. Originally published 1970.
Zwicky, Arnold M.: 1969, ‘Phonological Constraints in Syntactic Descriptions’, Papers in Linguistics 1, 411–63.
Zwicky, Arnold M.: 1982, ‘An Expanded View of Morphology in the Syntax-Phonology Interface,’ Preprints for the plenary session papers, the XIIIth International Congress of Linguists, Editorial Committee, pp. 168–78, Tokyo.
Zwicky, Arnold M. and Geoffrey K. Pullum: Forthcoming, The Syntax-Phonology Interface, Academic Press, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was completed while Zwicky was at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences; he is grateful for financial support from the Spencer Foundation and for sabbatical leave from the Ohio State University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zwicky, A.M., Pullum, G.K. Phonology in syntax: The Somali optional agreement rule. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 1, 385–402 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142471
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142471