Skip to main content
Log in

Binocular visual perception in strabismics studied by means of visual evoked responses

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ten normal subjects and 14 patients with comitant esotropia were examined by means of pattern visual evoked responses (VER) under monocular and binocular viewing conditions. When both eyes were stimulated together a VER summation was noted both in normals and in strabismics with small-angle deviation and anomalous retinal correspondence (ARC). This is considered as an objective proof of binocularity. Patients with large-angle strabismus and/or suppression of the image of the deviated eye did not show summation. The significance of summation and its relationship with binocular vision was analyzed by recording binocular VER in normals in which diplopia was artificially induced and in strabismics who spontaneously exhibited double vision. A simple way for differentiating normals from strabismics by means of VERs is presented, considering that the presence or absence of summation per se does not achieve this result. This method is based on the anteposition in front of the fixing eye of neutral filters of increasing density. Summation disappears in strabismics with much weaker filters than in normals (0.5 versus 1.6 log. unit).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amigo G, Fiorentini A, Pirchio M and Spinelli D (1978) Binocular vision tested with evoked potentials in children and infants. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 17:910

    Google Scholar 

  2. Apkarian P, Levi D and Tyler CW (1981) Binocular Facilitation in the Visual Evoked Potential of Strabismic Amblyopes. Amer J Optom & Physiol Optics 58: 820

    Google Scholar 

  3. Apkarian P, Nakayama K and Tyler CW (1981) Binocularity in the Human Visual Evoked Potential: Facilitation, Summation and Suppression. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 51:32

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bagolini B (1976) Part one. Sensorial anomalies in strabismus (Suppression, Anomalous Correspondence, Amblyopia). Doc Ophthalmol 41:1

    Google Scholar 

  5. Campos EC (1980) Anomalous Retinal Correspondence: Monocular and Binocular Visual Evoked Responses. Arch Ophthalmol 98:299

    Google Scholar 

  6. Campos EC (1982) Evaluation of binocularity by means of visual evoked responses. In: Strabismus MC Boschi & R Frosini (eds). Proc. Int. Symposium on Strabismus, CESSD, Florence, June 21–23. Tipografia Giuntina, p 119

    Google Scholar 

  7. Campos EC (1982) Binocularity in comitant strabismus: Binocular visual field studies. Doc Ophthalmol 53: 249

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chiesi C and Campos EC (1982) Objective assessment of the strength of binocularity in normals and strabismics. In: Strabismus MC Boschi & R Frosini (eds). Proc Int Symposium on Strabismus, CESSD, Florence, June 21–23. Tipografia Giuntina, p 167.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chiesi, C., Sargentini, A.D. & Bolzani, R. Binocular visual perception in strabismics studied by means of visual evoked responses. Doc Ophthalmol 58, 51–56 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140898

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140898

Key words

Navigation