Skip to main content
Log in

An axiomated family of power indices for simple n-person games

  • Articles
  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this probabilistic generalization of the Deegan-Packel power index, a new family of power indices based on the notions of minimal winning coalitions and equal division of pay offs is developed. The family of indices is parameterized by allowing minimal winning coalitions to form in accordance with varying probability functions. These indices are axiomatically characterized and compared to other similarly characterized indices. Additionally, a dual family of minimal blocking coalition indices and their characterization axioms is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banzhaf, J.F. (1965). ‘Weighted Voting Doesn't Work: A Mathematical Analysis.’ Rutgers Law Review, 19: 317–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, D. (1976). Essays in Social Choice Theory. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.

  • Brams, S.J. (1975). Game Theory and Politics. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S.J., and Affuso, P.J. (1976). ‘Power and Size: A New Paradox.’ Theory and Decision, 7: 29–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplow, T. (1968). Two Against One: Coalitions in Triads. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. (1971). ‘Control of Collectivities and the Power of a Collectivity to Act.’ In B. Lieberman (Ed.), Social Choice. New York: Gordon and Breach. 277–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, J., Jr., and Packel, E.W. (1976). ‘To the (Minimal Winning) Victors Go the (Equally Divided) Spoils: A New Power Index for Simple n-Person Games.’ Module in Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Association of America, Cornell University. 17 pp.

  • Deegan, J., Jr., and Packel, E.W. (1979). ‘A New Index of Power for Simple n-Person Games.’ International Journal of Game Theory, 7 (2): 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, P. (1975). ‘On the Uniqueness of the Shapley Value.’ International Journal of Game Theory, 4: 131–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, P. (1976). ‘Probabilistic Generalizations of the Shapley Value.’ Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 440. 29 pp.

  • Raanen, J. (1976). ‘The Inevitability of the Paradox of New Members.’ Department of Operations Research Technical Report 311, Cornell University.

  • Shapley, L.S., and Shubik, M. (1954). ‘A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System.’ American Political Science Review, 48: 787–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straffin, P. (1976). ‘Power Indices in Politics.’ Module in Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Association of America, Cornell University.

  • Straffin, P. (1977). ‘Homogeneity, Independence, and Power Indices.’ Public Choice, 30: 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Packel, E.W., Deegan, J. An axiomated family of power indices for simple n-person games. Public Choice 35, 229–239 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140846

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140846

Keywords

Navigation