Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of legislative success in House committees

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the factors that are associated with whether a bill passes the committee stage in the U.S. House of Representatives. Probit results for the 97th and 98th Congresses show that a bill is more likely to pass (1) if the sponsor chairs the committee that considers the bill or a subcommittee of that committee; (2) the higher the number of Democratic cosponsors who sit on the committee; (3) if the bill has bipartisan cosponsorship from members who sit on the committee that considers the bill. However, in the multivariate probit model including the above mentioned variables, other variables previously found to be important, e.g., the total number of cosponsors, whether or not the sponsor sits on the committee that considers the bill, and the party affiliation of the sponsor, are not statistically significant. Also a variable related to a public choice model of committee behavior, the difference between the sponsor's ideology (as measured by ADA score) and the ideology of the committee's median member, has no effect on a bill's probability of committee passage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Browne, W.P. (1985). Multiple sponsorship and bill success in U.S. state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly 10: 483–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. (1979). Cyclic sets in multidimensional voting models. Journal of Economic Theory 20: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commerce Clearing House. Congressional index. 97th Congress.

  • Commerce Clearing House. Congressional index. 98th Congress.

  • Congressional Quarterly. (1982). Guide to Congress. Washington, DC.

  • Congressional Quarterly. (3 July 1982). CQ Weekly Report, pp. 1616–1617. Washington, DC.

  • Congressional Quarterly. (16 October 1982). CQ Weekly Report, pp. 2679–2689. Washington, DC.

  • Congressional Quarterly. (14 July 1984). CQ Weekly Report, pp. 1696–1697. Washington, DC.

  • Congressional Quarterly. (20 October 1984). CQ Weekly Report, pp. 2699–2719. Washington, DC.

  • Crain, W.M., Leavens, D.R. and Tollison, R.D. (1986). Final voting in legislatures. American Economic Review 76: 833–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. and McKinnon, J. (1981). Several tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses. Econometrica 49: 781–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Committee on Printing. (1981). Congressional directory. 97th Congress 1st Session. Washington, DC: USGPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Committee on Printing. (1983). Congressional directory. 98th Congress 1st Session. Washington, DC: USGPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krehbiel, K. (1988). Spatial models of legislative choice. Legislative Studies Quarterly 13: 259–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R.D. (1979). General conditions for global intransitivities in formal voting models. Econometrica 47: 1085–1112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. (1980). A new solution set for tournaments and majority voting. American Journal of Political Science 24: 68–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordeshook, P.C. and Schwartz, T. (1987). Agendas and the control of political outcomes. American Political Science Review 81: 179–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, T. (1986). The logic of collective choice. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K.A. and Weingast, B.R. (1987a). The institutional foundations of committee power. American Political Science Review 81: 85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K.A. and Weingast, B.R. (1987b). Reflections on committee power. American Political Science Review 81: 935–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiefer, C. (1989). Congressional practice and procedure. Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congressional Research Service. (1983). Digest of public general bills and resolutions. Parts 1 and 2. 97th Congress 1st and 2nd Sessions. Washington, DC: USGPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congressional Research Service. (1985). Digest of public general bills and resolutions. Parts 1 and 2. 98th Congress 1st and 2nd Sessions. Washington, DC: USGPO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We are grateful to Linda Cohen, Tyler Cowen, Amihai Glazer, and Rick Hall for helpful comments. We are indebted to the Word Processing Center, School of Social Sciences, University of California, Irvine for manuscript typing. Any errors are our responsibility.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, S.J., Grofman, B. Determinants of legislative success in House committees. Public Choice 74, 233–243 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140770

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140770

Keywords

Navigation