Skip to main content
Log in

Bicameralism and majoritarian equilibrium

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent papers have established that bicameralism can support a non-empty core in majority voting games in two dimensional policy spaces. We generalise this result to the n-dimensional case, and provide a discussion of multi-cameralism. Bicameralism generates a core of potentially stable equilibria by institutionalising opposition between mutually oriented median voters, this provides a clear link with the standard median voter model and with more traditional analyses of bicameralism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brennan, G. and Hamlin, A. (1990). Bicameralism and stability. University of Southampton Economics Discussion Paper No. 9002.

  • Condorcet, Marquis de. (1787). Letters from a Freeman of New Haven to a Citizen of Virginia. In F. Sommerlad and I. McLean (Eds. and Trans.) (1990), The political theory of Condorcet II. Oxford University Faculty of Social Studies Working Paper 2/90.

  • Cox, G.W. and McKelvey, R.D. (1984). A ham sandwich theorem for general measures. Social Choice and Welfare 1: 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enelow, J. and Hinich, M. (1983). The spatial theory of voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, T.H. and Miller, G.J. (1987). The core of the constitution. American Political Science Review 81: 1155–1174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.J. and Hammond, T.H. (1990). Committees and the core of the constitution. Public Choice 66: 202–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, M. (1977). The political theory of Montesquieu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerlad, F. and McLean, I. (Eds. and Trans.) (1990). The political theory of Condorcet II. Oxford University Faculty of Social Studies Working Paper 2/90.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper (Brennan and Hamlin, 1990), written in ignorance of the work of Hammond and Miller (1987, 1990), benefited from comments at the Public Choice Society meetings, Tucson; the European Public Choice Society meetings, Meersburg; the Center for Study of Public Choice, and the Universities of Chicago and Oxford. Hamlin is grateful for the support of visiting fellowships at ANU and All Souls College, Oxford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brennan, G., Hamlin, A. Bicameralism and majoritarian equilibrium. Public Choice 74, 169–179 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140765

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140765

Keywords

Navigation