Skip to main content
Log in

The economics of atmosphere monitoring systems: Theory and applications

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years there has been increasing concern with the possibility that man's terrestrial economic activities of production, distribution, and consumption contribute pollutants to the environment in sufficient quantities to upset naturally existing chemical equilibria in the atmosphere. Such inadvertent anthropogenic phenomena have become associated with possible changes in climate (temperature, precipitation, and ultraviolet radiation) whose long term consequences may be serious, if not disastrous. Among other societal reactions to this problem, proposals for various environment monitoring systems have been proffered. Such systems, often envisioned as satellite-based, are costly and their benefits often appear largely intangible. In this research we develop a general methodology for identifying and estimating the economic benefits of environment monitoring systems, and we apply the methodology to the cases of stratospheric ozone depletion and aerosol accumulation. The research synthesizes numerous recent efforts in atmospheric chemistry, climatology, engineering, policy analysis, and primarily economic cost benefit analysis. We find that over a broad range of alternative assumptions and parameter choices, the present value of the economic benefits of an ozone/aerosol monitoring system in the range of $0.5 to $2,0 billion. Somewhat surprisingly, the higher values are associated with the smaller deleterious ozone/aerosol atmospheric trends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arthur D. Little, Inc.: 1975, Preliminary Economic Impact Assessment of Possible Regulatory Action to Control Atmospheric Emissions of Selected Holocarbons.

  2. Chang, J. S. and Johnson, H. S.: 1974, The Effect of NO x Effluents on Ozone, Proceedings of Third Conference on CIAP.

  3. Christie, A. D.: 1973, ‘Secular or Cyclic Change in Ozone’, Pure and Applied Geophysics 106–108.

  4. Cox, Breda: An Evaluation of Trend Analysis as Used on Ozone Data, Statistics Dept., VPI.

  5. Crutzen, P. J. and Enhalt, D. H.: 1977, ‘Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizers and Combustion on the Stratospheric Ozone Layer’, AMBIO 6.

  6. Cummings-Saxton, J., Weber, M. E., Ayres, R. V., Merrill, J. P., and Pifer, H. W. III: 1977, The Economic Impact of Potential Regulation of Chlorofluorocarbon - Propelled Aerosols, Environmental Protection Agency, Food and Drug Administration, Consumer Product Safety Commission.

  7. Han, H. and Cess, R. D.: 1976, ‘Stratospheric Aerosols: Effect on Atmospheric Temperature and Global Climate’, Tellus XXVIII.

  8. Hill, W. J., Sheldon, P. N., and Tiede, J. J.: 1977, ‘Analyzing Worldwide Total Ozone Trends’, Geophysical Research Letters 4.

  9. Komhyr, Barrett, Slocum, and Weickman: 1971, ‘Atmospheric Total Ozone Increase During the 1960's’, Nature 232.

  10. London, Julius and Kelly, Dean: 1974, ‘Global Trends in Total Atmospheric Ozone’, Science 184.

  11. National Academy of Sciences: 1916, Halocarbons: Effects on Stratospheric Ozone.

  12. Oliver, R. C., Bauer, E., Hidalgo, H., Gardner, K. A., and Wasylkiwskyj, W.: 1977, Aircraft Emissions: Potential Effects on Ozone and Climate, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Environmental Quality.

  13. Pittock, A. B.: 1972, ‘Evaluating the Risk to Society from the SST: Some Thoughts Occasioned by the AAS Report’, Search 3.

  14. Pittock, A. B.: 1974, ‘Ozone Climatology, Trends, and the Monitoring Problem’, Conference on Structure, Composition and Possible Anthropogenic Perturbations 1, 455.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pollack, J. B., Toon, O. B., Summers, A., Van Camp, W., and Baldwin, B.: 1976, ‘Estimates of the Climatic Impact of Aerosols Produced by Space Shuttles, SST's and Other High Flying Aircraft’, J. of Appl. Meteorol. 15.

  16. Ramanathan, V.: 1975, ‘Greenhouse Effect Due to Chlorofluorocarbons: Climatic Implications’, Science 190.

  17. Rummel, R. W.: 1975, ‘Possible Impact of Regulations on Aviation’, Astronautics and Aeronautics.

  18. Sassone, P. G. and Schaffer, W. A.: 1978, Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Handbook, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sassone, P. G. et al.: 1979, Benefit Assessment of Pollution Monitoring Satellites, Final Report NAS1-14351, Georgia Institute of Technology.

  20. U.S.Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Domestic Commerce: 1975, Economic Significance of Fluorocarbons.

  21. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census: 1976, ‘United States Population Projections to 2050’, Statistical Abstract of the United States.

  22. U.S. Federal Council for Science and Technology: 1975, ‘The Possible Impact of Fluorocarbons and Halocarbons on Ozone’.

  23. U.S. Department of Transportation: 1974, ‘The Effects of Stratospheric Pollution by Aircraft’, Final Report, Climatic Impact Assessment Program (CIAP).

  24. U.S. Department of Transportation: 1975, Economic and Social Measures of Biologic and Climatic Change, CIAP Monograph 6.

  25. Willett, Hurd C.: 1962, ‘The Relationship of Total Atmospheric Ozone to the Sunspot Cycle’, J. of Geophys. Res. 67.

  26. Wolfsy, S. C. and McElroy M. B.: 1974, ‘HO x , NO x , and C10 x : Their role in Atmospheric Photochemistry’, Canadian Journal of Chemistry 52.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was partially supported by contract NASI-14351 with NASA's Langley Research Center.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sassone, P.G. The economics of atmosphere monitoring systems: Theory and applications. Climatic Change 4, 133–171 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140586

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140586

Keywords

Navigation