Skip to main content
Log in

Some aspects of science-based technological promotion

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scientific research car for scientific purposes. As such, scientific research will necessarily be evaluate scientific terms. However, scientific research can also be supported for such nonscientific purposes as economic development, industrialization, education, etc. In that case, evaluation of scientific research will be based on economic, educational, etc., yardsticks.

This paper attempts to seek evaluation criteria for the public support of science for the purposes of technological promotion. Such a public investment is shown to be a risky process. The “riskiness” of the process is discussed within the framework of a model of science-based technology and expressed in stochastic terms. A decision-making framework is then developed on the basis of expected utility hypotheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. J. Arrow, Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing, Markham Publishing Company, Chicago, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. R. Ashby, Introduction to Cybernetics, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. J. Boulding, “The Diminishing Returns of Science,” New Scientist and Science Journal, 49 (March 1971), 682–684.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Brooks, “Applied Research: Definitions, Concepts, Themes,” in Applied Science and Technological Progress: A Report by the National Academy of Sciences, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Brooks, “Models for Science Planning,” Public Administration Review, 31 (May–June 1971), 364–374.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. 1 Second Ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. II, Second Ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Z. Griliches, “Distributed Lags: A Survey,” Econometrica, 35 (January 1967), 16–49.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Hirshleifer, “On the Theory of Optimal Investment Decision,” Journal of Political Economy, 46 (August 1958), 329–352.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. G. Johnson, “Some Economic Aspects of Science,” Minerva, 10 (January 1972), 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. A. Marchak, “Models, Rules, and Development Decisions,” in B. V. Dean, Ed., Operations Research in Research and Development, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  12. The Measurement of Scientific and Technical Activities (Frascati Manual), OECD/DAS/SPR/70.40, Paris, 1970.

  13. J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Third Ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. R. Ravetz, Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. Rosenberg, “Science, Invention and Economic Growth,” The Economic Journal, 84 (March 1974), 90–108.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Tullock, The Organization of Inquiry, Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to thank S. N. H. Naqvi and Sübidey Togan for their helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tuncer, Y. Some aspects of science-based technological promotion. Policy Sci 6, 267–280 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139970

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139970

Keywords

Navigation