Abstract
The purpose of reason or rationality in the analysis of resource allocation decisions is to provide decision makers with guidance on policy decisions which result in improvement, i.e. a net increment in social welfare. The difficulty with what might be called the microrationality of cost-benefit analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis as conventionally practised is that unless the context of such rationality is established in the larger framework of what might in turn be called the macrorationality which reflects an awareness of the properties of the whole system, the policy analyst cannot know whether his recommendation will upgrade (constitute an improvement in) or degrade (constitute a deterioration in) the system as a whole. The paper attempts to suggest a first conceptual approach, and an implied research agenda, addressed to developing a more effective general context for policy analysis.
The suggested approach has four major components; first, the establishment of the basis for policy analysis in the explicit specification of a general weighted objective function for national policy and a corresponding set of functions for particular programs and projects; second, the development and incorporation in cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of a set of analytical parameters which establish the basis for policy analyses which are in the first instance comparable, and in the second instance consistent with the national objective function; third, the development of a general analytical framework for cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis which recognizes the essential interdependency of policy decisions, including the financing implications of expenditure policies; and, finally, the explicit recognition of the need for a criterion of overall system improvement in the development of an analytical framework for the measurement of the trades-off or opportunity costs between alternative policy mixes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
I. M. D. Little and J. A. Mirrlees, Manual of Industrial Project Analysis in Developing Countries, 2, Social Cost Benefit Analysis (Paris: O.E.C.D. 1968).
U.N.I.D.O., Guidelines for Project Evaluation (New York: U.N., 1972).
C. West Churchman, Challenge to Reason (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968).
J. Rothenberg, The Measurement of Social Welfare (Englewood-Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1961).
P. O. Steiner, “The Public Sector and the Public Interest,” in R. H. Haveman and J. Margolis, eds., Public Expenditures and Policy Analysis (Chicago: Markham, 1971).
Guidelines for Project Evaluation, op. cit.
A. T. Peacock, “Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Political Control of Public Investment,” in J. N. Wolfe, ed., Cost Benefit and Cost Effectiveness (London: Allen and Unwin, 1973).
J. Cutt, Program Budgeting for Welfare (New York: Praeger, 1973).
S. Marglin, Public Investment Criteria (London: Allen and Unwin, 1967).
R. McKean, Efficiency in Government through Systems Analysis (New York: Wiley, 1958).
A. C. Pigou, The Economics of Welfare (London: Macmillan, 1948).
J. Tinbergen, On the Theory of Economic Policy (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1952).
D. Hartle, “A Proposed System of Program and Policy Evaluation,” Canadian Public Administration (Summer 1973), 243–266.
C. D. Foster, “A Note on the Treatment of Taxation in Cost-Benefit Analysis,” in J. N. Wolfe, ed., Cost Benefit and Cost Effectiveness (London: Allen and Unwin, 1973).
W. J. Baumol, “On the Social Rate of Discount,” American Economic Review (September 1968), 788–802.
P. O. Steiner, “The Public Sector and the Public Interest,” op. cit.
C. W. Churchman, R. L. Ackoff, and E. L. Arnoff, Introduction to Operations Research (New York: Wiley, 1957); W. S. Torgerson, Theory and Methods of Scaling (New York: Wiley, 1958); D. H. Krantz, R. D. Luce, P. Suppes and A. Tversky, Foundations of Measurement, 1 (New York: Academic Press, 1971); C. W. Churchman and P. Ratoosh, Measurement, Definitions and Theories (New York: Wiley, 1959); R. M. Thrall, C. H. Coombs and R. L. Davis, Decision Processes (New York: Wiley, 1954); S. S. Stevens, “Mathematics, Measurement and Psychophysics,” in S. S. Stevens, ed., Handbook of Experimental Psychology (New York: Wiley, 1951).
Stevens, op. cit.
Tyler, op. cit., p. 7.
Churchman, Ackoff and Arnoff, op. cit., pp. 138–153.
A. T. Peacock, “Cost Benefit Analysis and the Political Control of Public Investment,” paper presented at the 1971 meetings of the International Public Finance Association, and published in J. N. Wolfe, ed., Cost Benefit and Cost Effectiveness Analysis (London: Allen and Unwin, 1973), pp. 17–29.
A. Williams, “Cost Benefit Analysis: Bastard Science? and/or Insidious Poison in the Body Politick,” in Cost Benefit and Cost Effectiveness Analysis, op. cit., pp. 30–60.
E. J. Mishan, Cost-Benefit Analysis (London: Allen and Unwin, 1971).
R. Turvey, “Present Value Versus Internal Rate of Return—An Essay in the Theory of the Second Best,” Economic Journal, 1963.
H. G. Walsh and A. Williams, Current Issues in Cost-Benefit Analysis, CAS Occasional Papers (London: H.M.S.O., 1969).
D. Hartle, “A Proposed System of Program and Policy Evaluation,” op. cit.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cutt, J. Policy analysis: A conceptual base for a theory of improvement. Policy Sci 6, 223–248 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139968
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139968