Skip to main content
Log in

Path analysis with partial association measures

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the use of partial association measures for carrying out path analyses on categorical data. The measures considered are essentially PRE (proportion of reduction in error of prediction) measures for nominal variables and concordance-discordance indices for ordinal ones. These measures provide a natural way to evaluate the strength of the path linking a non-measurable response variable to one of several categorical explanatory factors. Concerning the decomposition of raw association into direct and indirect effects, it is shown, however, that they do not share the properties of conventional path coefficients for measurable variables. Especially purely nominal association measures need to be interpreted with care. The scope of the partial measures for path analysis is illustrated through a study of the relationships between the educational styles experienced by swiss adolescents and their selfesteem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agresti, A. (1986). Applying R 2-type measures to ordered categorical data, Technometrics, 28: 133–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H. M. (1971). Causal Models in the Social Sciences, Aldeline-Atherton, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. B. & Benedetti, J. K. (1977). Sampling behavior of tests for correlation in two-way contingency tables, J. Amer. Statist. Ass. 72: 309–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, H. (1971). Mathematical Methods of Statistics, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. A. (1967). A partial coefficient for Goodman and Kruskal's gamma, J. Amer. Statist. Ass. 62: 189–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. & Kruskal, W. H. (1954). Measures of association for cross classifications, J. Amer. Statist. Ass. 37: 54–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. & Kruskal, W. H. (1963). Measures of association for cross classifications III: Approximate sampling theory, J. Amer. Statist. Ass. 58: 310–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. & Kruskal, W. H. (1972). Measures of association for cross classifications IV: Simplification of asymptotic variances, J. Amer. Statist. Ass. 67: 415–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerhals, J. & Montandon, C., with Gaberel, P. E., McCluskey, H., Osiek, F. & Sardi, M. (1991). Les stratégies éducatives des familles. Milieu social, dynamique familiale et éducation des préadolescents, Delachaux & Niestlé, Neuchâtel/Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerhals, J., Montandon, C., Ritschard, G. & Sardi, M. (1992a). Le style éducatif des parents et l'estime de soi des adolescents, Rev. franç. sociol. 33(3): 313–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerhals, J., Montandon, C. & Ritschard, G. (1992b). Social status, types of family interaction and educational styles, Eur. J. Sociol. 23: 308–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M. G. (1983). A new measure of rank correlation, Biometrika 30: 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M. G. (1945). The treatment of ties in rank problems, Biometrika 33: 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olszak, M. & Ritschard, G. (1995). The behavior of nominal and ordinal partial association measures, The Statistician, forthcoming.

  • Pearson, K. (1904). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution, XIII. On the theory of contingency and its relation to association and normal correlation, Draper's Co. Research Memoirs, Biometric Series, 1 (Reprinted 1948 in: E. S. Pearson (ed.), Karl Pearson's Early Papers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Quade, D. (1974). Nonparametric partial correlation, in H. M. BlalockJr. (ed.), Measurement in the Social Sciences, Aldine-Atherton, Chicago, pp. 369–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication, Bell System Techn. J. 27: 379–423, 623–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, A. (1953). The estimation and comparison of strengths of association in contingency tables, Biometrika 40: 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, R. H. (1962). A new asymmetric measure for ordinal variables, Amer. Sociolog. Rev. 27: 799–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1970). On the estimation of relationships involving qualitative variables, Amer. J. Sociol. 76: 103–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschuprow, A. A. (1918). On the mathematical expectation of moments of frequency distribution, Biometrika 12: 140–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. P. (1974). Measures of association for bivariate ordinal hypotheses, in: H. M. BlalockJr. (ed.), Measurement in the Social Sciences, Aldine-Atherton, Chicago, pp. 327–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1934). The method of path coefficients, Ann. Math. Statist. 5: 161–215.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ritschard, G., Kellerhals, J., Olszak, M. et al. Path analysis with partial association measures. Qual Quant 30, 37–60 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139834

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139834

Key words

Navigation