Skip to main content
Log in

Teaching effectiveness as measured by student ratings and instructor self-evaluation

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study is designed to evaluate teaching effectiveness based on effective teacher behaviors. Operationally, it is measured by assessing levels of agreement between perceptions of instructors and students on reported employment rates and rated ability for specific instructional behavior attributes. Individually-based and organizationally-based factors are incorporated in the study for a possible contribution to teaching effectiveness variance. Findings indicate a lack of agreement between perceptions on abstract instructional attributes but that agreement exists for attributes of a concrete nature. Analysis suggests that individually-based and organizationally-based factors do not contribute to agreement variance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basset, E. R. and Smythe, M. J. (1979). Instructional Communication. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. (1977). “Student ratings of instruction and their relationships to learning,” American Education Research Journal 14: 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, K. O. and Whitely, S. W. (1974). “Student ratings as criteria for effective teaching,” American Education Research Journal 11: 259–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, K. O. and Whitely, S. E. (1976). “Implicit theories in student ratings,” American Education Research Journal 13: 241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressel, P. L. and Lorimer, M. F. (1961). “Instructional self-evaluation,” in Dressel, P. L. (ed.) Evaluation in Higher Education. Boston: Houghton Miflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmid, M. L. and Goldschmid, B. (1976). “The Role of Institutional Management in Improving Instruction in Higher Education,” paper presented at the Third General Conference on Institutional Management in Higher Education, 13–16 September. Paris: OECD, CERI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmid, M. (1978). “The evaluation and improvement of teaching in higher education,” Higher Education 7: 221–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurt, H. T., Scott, M. D. and McCrosky, J. C. (1978). Communication in the Classroom. Reading, Mass,: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. A. and McKeachie, W. J. (1975). “The evaluation of teachers in higher education,” in F. N. Kerlinger (eded.) Review of Research in Education. Ithaca: Peacock Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miron, M. and Segal, E. (1978). “The good university teacher as perceived by the students,” Higher Education 7: 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, E. H. (1976). “Attitudes of college and university faculty toward the use of student evaluations,” Educational Research Quarterly 1 (3): 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. D. and Nussbaum, J. F. (1981). “Student perceptions of instructor communication behaviors and their relationships to student evaluation,” Communication Education 30: 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvernail, D. L. (1979). Teaching Styles Related to Student Achievement. Washington, D.C. National Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telenbaum, T. J. (1975). “The role of student needs and teacher orientations in student ratings of teachers,” American Research Journal 12 (4): 417–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimberly, R. C., Faulkner, G. L. and Moxley, R. L. (1978). “Dimensions of teacher effectiveness,” Teaching Sociology 4: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Avi-Itzhak, T. Teaching effectiveness as measured by student ratings and instructor self-evaluation. High Educ 11, 629–634 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139779

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139779

Keywords

Navigation