Skip to main content
Log in

Audiovisual media and educational technology in the traditional university: The working compromise or the grand design?

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is conflict between the liberal goals of a university education and the view which associates educational technology and audiovisual media with rigid and impersonal learning routines. In practice, not all university teaching is liberal, and educational technology can itself be a liberalising influence. Four areas of application of audiovisual media in university teaching are considered and some of the contributions which an educational technologist can make to teaching and learning in these areas are outlined. The role of an educational technologist in a traditional university is briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annett, J. (1969). Feedback and Human Behaviour. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1951). “The bearing of experimental psychology upon human skilled performance,” British Journal of Industrial Medicine 8: 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, A. W. and Pugh, A. K. (1975). “Designing multi-media courses for individualised study: the Open University model and its relevance to conventional universities,” British Journal of Educational Technology 6(3): 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, J. G., Teather, D. C. B., Milan, D. M. and Redshaw, N. R. (1976). “Student participation in the production of learning materials,” Medical and Biological Illustration 26: 223–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, I. M. (1974). “Recall, comprehension and problem solving: evaluation of an audio-visual method of learning plant anatomy,” Journal of Biological Education 8: 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clift, J. C. and Malley, J. I. (1974). Bibliography of Microteaching with Selected Annotations. Wellington: University Teaching and Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for Educational Technology (1976). “Educational technology in a time of economic stringency: a statement by the Council for Educational Technology for the United Kingdom,” in CET Annual Report for the Year October 1975–September 1976. London: CET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falus, I. and McAleese, W. R. (1975). “A bibliography of microteaching,” Programmed Learning and Educational Technology 12: 34–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmid, B. and Goldschmid, M. L. (1976). “Peer teaching in higher education: a review,” Higher Education 5: 9–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Group for Research and Innovation in Higher Education (1975). Course Teams: Four Case Studies and a Commentary. London: The Nuffield Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, W. C. (1975). “Pretending not to be an educational technologist,” Programmed Learning and Educational Technology 12: 327–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leytham, G. W. H. (1972). “A programmed second-year course on the psychology of learning: Part 3: Evaluation and conclusions,” Programmed Learning and Educational Technology 9: 98–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Educational Technology (1973). Educational Technology: Progress and Promise. London: NCET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northcott, P. (1976) “The Institute of Educational Technology, The Open University: structure and operations, 1969–1975,” Programmed Learning and Educational Technology 13(4): 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach, K. and Hammond, R. (1976). “Zoology by self-instruction,” Studies in Higher Education 1: 179–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree, D. (1974). Educational Technology in Curriculum Development. London: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree, D. (1975). “Two styles of communication and their implications for learning,” in Baggaley, J., Jamieson, G. H. and Marchant, H., eds., Aspects of Educational Technology 8: Communication and Learning, pp. 281–293. London: Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree, D. (1976). “Evaluation: the critical ingredient of educational technology?” Programmed Learning and Educational Technology 13(4): 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, L. F. and Ettinger, A. (1973). Basic Diagnostic Radiology: Self-Instruction Seminars. New York: Programmed Seminars Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. C. (1976). “Educational materials: their development, supply, use and management,” in Materials for Learning and Teaching, pp. 28–36. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teather, D. C. B. (1977). “The training of university teachers: an integral part of an educational technology centre's activities?” South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 5: 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee (1964) Report of the Committee on University Teaching Methods, Chairman Sir Edward Hale. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford, A. T. (1968). Fundamentals of Skill. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. (1975). “The application of interactive telecommunications systems to education,” in Baggaley, J., Jamieson, G. H. and Marchant, H., eds., Aspects of Educational Technology 8: Communication and Learning, pp. 294–299. London: Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teather, D.C.B. Audiovisual media and educational technology in the traditional university: The working compromise or the grand design?. High Educ 7, 431–442 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139657

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139657

Keywords

Navigation