Abstract
The understanding of concepts in social science was investigated by interviewing students studying two foundation courses in Social Science at the Open University. The investigation was carried out using the research paradigm of phenomenography (Marton, 1981) where the content of learning is seen as a quality rather than as a quantity. There were two aims of the research.
-
1.
To discover the different understandings that students hold of particular important concepts in Social Science.
-
2.
To use the method as a method of formative evaluation to influence the production of new course materials.
This paper concentrates on describing the results in terms of two evaluation strategies: Formative evaluation, where the students' understandings of the concept before the course were used to influence the teaching strategy of the remade course. Summative evaluation, where the students' answers before and after the course were compared to evaluate their learning on the course.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dahlgren, Lars Owe (1978). “Qualitative differences in conceptions of basic principles in economics—a contribution to discussion of the validity of examination results,” University of Lancaster 4th International Conference on Higher Education.
Marton, F. (1981). “Phenomenography—Describing conceptions of the world around us,” Instructional Science 10: 177–200.
Marton, F., Hounsell, D. & Entwistle, N. (1984). The Experience of Learning. Scottish Academy Press.
Perry, W.G. (1968). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years—a scheme. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Taylor, E., Morgan, A.R. and Gibbs, G. (1981). Students' understandings of the concept of social class. Open University, Study Methods Group Report No. 10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beaty, E.M. Understanding concepts in social science: towards an effective evaluation strategy. Instr Sci 15, 341–359 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139620
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139620