Skip to main content
Log in

Students' in-class thinking

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last decade classroom researchers have begun to show interest in how students think during classroom instruction. The impetus for this shift in focus comes from a research paradigm which proposes that students' in-class thought processes mediate the effects of teaching processes on student learning and that studies of student thinking could therefore provide a key to a fuller understanding of how teaching processes influence student learning. Such studies have implications for teacher education and improving teaching.

This paper provides an account of a descriptive study of student thinking. It documents aspects of student thinking during regular lessons in a Grade Eleven Biology classroom and a Grade Ten Social Science classroom. Access to student thinking was obtained by using videotapes of lessons to stimulate recall of in-lesson thinking in post-lesson interviews. Analysis of students' self-report data provided insights into the nature of, and factors influencing, student thinking. It also called into question the value of some conventional wisdom about teaching and approaches to research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, H.S., Geer, B. & Hughes, B.C. (1968) Making the Grade. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. (1977) Paradigms for Research on Teacher Effectiveness. In L.S. Shulman (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, Vol. 5. Itasca, Ill: F.E. Peacock, 163–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. (1979) Student Mediating Responses in Teacher Effectiveness. ERIC Microfiche ED187698.

  • Edwards, J. & Baldauf, R.B.Jr. (1982). Teaching Thinking in Secondary Science. In Maxwell, W. (Ed.), Thinking: The Expanding Frontier. Philadelphia: Franklin Institute Press, 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. & Marland, P. (1982). Student Thinking in a Secondary Biology Classroom. Paper presented to the Australian Science Education Research Association Conference, Macquarie University, Sydney.

  • Elstein, A.S., Shulman, L.S. & Sprafka, S.A. (1978) Medical Problem Solving: An Analysis of Clinical Reasoning. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, D., Vinsonhaler, J.F. & Wagner, C.C. (1979) Studies of Clinical Problem Solving Behaviour in Reading Clinicians. (Research Series No. 43). East Lansing: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, N., Krathwohl, D.R., Goldberg, A.D. & Campbell, R. (1967) Studies in Human Interaction: Interpersonal Process Recall Stimulated by Videotape. East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland, P.W. (1979). A study of Teachers' Interactive Information Processing. In G. Rowley (Ed.), Proceedings of the A.A.R.E. Annual Conference. Melbourne: A.A.R.E., 42–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland, P.W. & Caldwell, N.B.A. (1981) Instructional Planning: A Case Study. In Varley, P., Barlett, L. and Gillespie, R. (Eds.) Educational Research in the 1980's. Collected Papers, Vol. 2., Brisbane, Australian Association for Research in Education, pp. 396–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair, K. & Joyce, B. (1979) Teachers' Thoughts While Teaching: The South Bay Study, Part II. (Research Series No. 58). East Lansing, Michigan: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P.L. & Swing, S.R. (1982) Beyond Time On Task: Students' Reports of Their Thought Processes During Classroom Instruction, The Elementary School Journal, 42, 5: 481–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S. (1982) When Do Instructional Methods Make A Difference?, Educational Researcher, 11(4): 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P.H. (1982) Cognitive Processing in the Classroom. Paper published by Instructional Psychology Research Group, Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University.

  • Winne, P.H. & Marx, R.W. (1982) Students' and Teachers' Views of Thinking Processes for Classroom Learning, The Elementary School Journal, 42, 5: 493–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P.H. & Marx, R.W. (1983) Students' Cognitive Processes While Learning from Teaching: Summary of Findings, Occasional Paper No. 83–03, Instructional Psychology Research Group, Simon Fraser University, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yinger, R.J. (1980) A Study of Teacher Planning. The Elementary School Journal, 33, 134–139.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marland, P.W., Edwards, J. Students' in-class thinking. Instr Sci 15, 75–88 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139605

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139605

Keywords

Navigation