Abstract
This paper examines the interactions that authors of articles appearing in the core higher education journals have with members of the field subsequent to the publication of their work. Interactions were examined by the epistemological structure of the articles and data suggest that papers with different structures exact different types of reader-initiated reactions, though there are similarities regardless of type. It appears that published scholarship leads to further activities in research, scholarly, and professional sectors as a consequence of readers' initiatives and the resulting responses by authors. It is argued that examinations of knowledge use should go beyond traditional conceptions and examine the development of new communities of interest as professional actors attempt to fulfill varied agendas on the basis of published scholarship.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argyris, Chris (1972). The Applicability of Organizational Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berlyne, Daniel (1971). Aesthetics and Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Berlyne, Daniel (1974). Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation. New York: Wiley.
Cummings, L.L. and Frost, Peter J. (1985). Publishing in the Organizational Sciences. Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin.
De Vries, Gerard and Harbers, Hans (1985). “Attuning Science to Culture: Scientific and Popular Discussion in Dutch Sociology of Education, 1960–1980”. In T. Shinn and R. Whitley (eds.), Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation (pp. 103–117). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
Dunn, William N. (1982). “The Two-Communities Metaphor and Models of Knowledge Use: An Exploratory Case Survey”, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 3: 293–326.
Fleck, Ludwik (1979). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Garfield, Eugene (1979). Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities. New York: Wiley.
Garvey, W. D. and Griffeth, B. C. (1971). “Scientific Communication: Its Role in the Conduct of Research and Creation of Knowledge”, American Psychologist 26: 349–362.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin (1981). The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin and Cicourel, Aaron (1981). Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Lindblom, Charles and Cohen, David (1979). Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Merton, Robert K. (1968). “The Matthew Effect in Science”, Science 159: 56–63.
Mitroff, Ian and Kilmann, Ralph (1978). Methodological Approaches to Social Science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Moravcsik, Michael J. and Murugesan, Pooranalingam (1975). “Some Results on the Function and Quality of Citations”, Social Studies of Science 5: 86–92.
Peters, Charles E. (1981). An Investigation of the Relationship Between Jungian Psychological Type and Preferred Styles of Inquiry. Ph. D. Dissertation, Ohio State University.
Silva, Edward and Slaughter, Sheila (1983). Serving Power: The Making of the Social Science Expert, 1865–1921. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
Silverman, Robert J. (1982a). Getting Published in Education Journals. Springfield, Ill: Charles C Thomas.
Silverman, Robert J. (1982b). “Journal Manuscripts in Higher Education: A Framework”, Review of Higher Education 5: 181–196.
Silverman, Robert J. (1984). “Publishing Patterns Evidenced in the Core Higher Education Journals”. Research in Higher Education 21: 159–177.
Sims, Henry, Giola, Dennis and Associates (1986). The Thinking Organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Weick, Karl (1983). “Managerial Thought in the Context of Action”. In S. Srivastva et al. The Executive Mind (pp. 221–242). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Weiss, Carol with Bucuvalas, Michael (1980). Social Science Research and Decision-Making. New York: Columbia University Press.
Whitley, Richard (1984). The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.
Whitley, Richard (1985). “Knowledge Producers and Knowledge Acquirers: Popularisation as a Relation Between Scientific Fields and Their Publics”. In T. Shinn and R. Whitley (eds.), Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation (pp. 3–28). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Silverman, R.J. Author-field interaction following publication in “higher education” journals. High Educ 17, 361–375 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139533
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139533