Skip to main content
Log in

Author-field interaction following publication in “higher education” journals

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the interactions that authors of articles appearing in the core higher education journals have with members of the field subsequent to the publication of their work. Interactions were examined by the epistemological structure of the articles and data suggest that papers with different structures exact different types of reader-initiated reactions, though there are similarities regardless of type. It appears that published scholarship leads to further activities in research, scholarly, and professional sectors as a consequence of readers' initiatives and the resulting responses by authors. It is argued that examinations of knowledge use should go beyond traditional conceptions and examine the development of new communities of interest as professional actors attempt to fulfill varied agendas on the basis of published scholarship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyris, Chris (1972). The Applicability of Organizational Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, Daniel (1971). Aesthetics and Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, Daniel (1974). Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, L.L. and Frost, Peter J. (1985). Publishing in the Organizational Sciences. Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, Gerard and Harbers, Hans (1985). “Attuning Science to Culture: Scientific and Popular Discussion in Dutch Sociology of Education, 1960–1980”. In T. Shinn and R. Whitley (eds.), Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation (pp. 103–117). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, William N. (1982). “The Two-Communities Metaphor and Models of Knowledge Use: An Exploratory Case Survey”, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 3: 293–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, Ludwik (1979). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, Eugene (1979). Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, W. D. and Griffeth, B. C. (1971). “Scientific Communication: Its Role in the Conduct of Research and Creation of Knowledge”, American Psychologist 26: 349–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, Karin (1981). The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, Karin and Cicourel, Aaron (1981). Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Charles and Cohen, David (1979). Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. (1968). “The Matthew Effect in Science”, Science 159: 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, Ian and Kilmann, Ralph (1978). Methodological Approaches to Social Science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Michael J. and Murugesan, Pooranalingam (1975). “Some Results on the Function and Quality of Citations”, Social Studies of Science 5: 86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Charles E. (1981). An Investigation of the Relationship Between Jungian Psychological Type and Preferred Styles of Inquiry. Ph. D. Dissertation, Ohio State University.

  • Silva, Edward and Slaughter, Sheila (1983). Serving Power: The Making of the Social Science Expert, 1865–1921. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, Robert J. (1982a). Getting Published in Education Journals. Springfield, Ill: Charles C Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, Robert J. (1982b). “Journal Manuscripts in Higher Education: A Framework”, Review of Higher Education 5: 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, Robert J. (1984). “Publishing Patterns Evidenced in the Core Higher Education Journals”. Research in Higher Education 21: 159–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, Henry, Giola, Dennis and Associates (1986). The Thinking Organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl (1983). “Managerial Thought in the Context of Action”. In S. Srivastva et al. The Executive Mind (pp. 221–242). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Carol with Bucuvalas, Michael (1980). Social Science Research and Decision-Making. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, Richard (1984). The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, Richard (1985). “Knowledge Producers and Knowledge Acquirers: Popularisation as a Relation Between Scientific Fields and Their Publics”. In T. Shinn and R. Whitley (eds.), Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation (pp. 3–28). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silverman, R.J. Author-field interaction following publication in “higher education” journals. High Educ 17, 361–375 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139533

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139533

Keywords

Navigation