Abstract
Employers optimally pursue activities which facilitate the coordinating of employee characteristics and the requirements of the job. One allegedly important employee characteristic is the level of education. Employees with higher levels of education are rewarded with higher wages than employees with lower levels. This may occur if higher levels of education make an employee truly more productive or if because of an employer's beliefs only those individuals with higher levels of education are allowed to enter the higher paying positions (occupational screening).
The above propositions are testable, depending crucially upon the theoretical model employed for determining occupational choices. We shall compare the implications of two possible occupation choice models: (1) enter the job which offers the highest lifetime income, (2) enter the job which offers the highest level of overall satisfaction. We estimate these two models using the NBER-TH data sample. By distributing our estimated results and the actual distribution of occupations over the education levels of high school, some college and BA we can see if more or less people are expected to enter specific occupations at each education level. Support for screening exists if more people are expected in high status occupations at low education levels than are actually in those occupations.
When comparing the estimated results for each model we see different outcomes emerge. The latter indicates that screening does not exist while the former does. We present arguments as to why we feel that the second model is the more correct and appropriate and, consequently, why we feel that education is not an effective screening device.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow, K. (1972). “Higher Education as a Filter.” Paper presented at La Paz Conference, June.
Becker, G. (1964). Human Capital. N.Y.: Columbia University Press.
Bowles, S. (1972). “Schooling and Inequality from Generation to Generation,” Journal of Political Economy, May/June, Part II.
Chiswick, B. (1973). “Schooling, Screening, and Income,” in Taubman, P. and Solmon, L. (eds.) Does College Matter? New York: Academic Press.
Duncan, G. (1974). “Nonpecuniary Work Rewards,” Five Thousand American Families, Vol. II. Michigan: Survey Research Center.
Griliches, Z. and W. Mason (1972). “Education, Income, and Ability,” Journal of Political Economy, May/June, Part II.
Haspel, A. (1974). Occupational Decision Making: A Socioeconomic Analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Haspel, A. and P. Taubman (1975). “The Choice of Occupations: Some Empirical Evidence,” mimeo.
Henderson, J. and R. Quandt (1971). Microeconomic Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Jencks, C. (1972). Inequality. New York: Harper and Row.
Layard, R. and G. Psacharopoulos (1974). “The Screening Hypothesis and the Return to Education,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 82, No. 5.
Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, Experience and Earnings. New York: Columbia University Press.
Morgenstern, R. (1973). “Direct and Indirect Effects on Earnings of Schooling and SES,” Review of Economics and Statistics, May.
Rees, A. (1961). Occupations and Social Status. New York: The Free Press.
Smith, A. (1957). Selections from the Wealth of Nations, G. Stigler (ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Solomon, L. (1973). “The Definition and Impact of College Quality,” in Taubman, P. and Solomon, L. (eds.) Does College Matter? New York: Academic Press.
Spence, M. (1973). “Job Market Signalling,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, August.
Taubman, P. (1975). Sources of Inequality and Earnings. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
Taubman, P. and T. Wales (1974). Higher Education: An Investment and a Screening Device. New York: NBER. (McGraw-Hill, Inc.).
Thaler, R. and S. Rosen (1974). “The Value of Saving a Life: Evidence from the Labor Market.” University of Rochester Discussion Paper 74-2.
Theil, H. (1971). Principles of Econometrics. New York: Wiley.
Thorndike, R. and E. Hagen (1959). Ten Thousand Careers. New York: Wiley.
Tinbergen, J. (1959). “On the Theory of Income Distribution,” Jan Tinbergen - Selected Papers. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
Wiles, P. (1974). “The Correlation between Education and Earnings: The External Test-Not-Content Hypothesis (ETNC),” Higher Education, 3: 43–58.
Zavoina, W. and R. McKelvey (1969). “A Statistical Model for the Analysis of Legislative Voting Behavior.” Paper presented at the 1969 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, NYC, September.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haspel, A.E. The questionable role of higher education as an occupational screening device. High Educ 7, 279–294 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139527
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139527