References
Bělař, K. (1928). Die cytologischen Grundlagen der Vererbung. In. Handbuch der Vererbungswissenschaft. Eds. E. Baur & M. Hartmann. Borntraeger Verlag, Berlin.
Darlington, C.D. (1932). Recent advances in cytology. 1 ed. Churchill, London.
Darlington, C.D. (1937). Recent advances in cytology. 2 ed. Churchill, London.
Eichhorn, A. (1952). Contribution à l'étude caryologique du genre Linaria. Revue Cytol. Biol. vég. 13: 117–145.
Klášterská, I. (1971). Une contribution au problème de la reproduction sexuelle chez les roses de la section Caninae. Ann. Univ. et ARERS 9: 140–144.
Klášterská, I. (1976). A new look on the role of the diffuse stage in problems of plant and animal meiosis. Hereditas 82: 193–204.
Klášterská, I. (1977). The concept of the prophase of meiosis. Hereditas 86: 205–210.
Klášterská, I. (1978). Structure of the eukaryotic chromosomes: the differences between mammalian (mouse), grasshopper (Stethophyma) and plant (Rosa) chromosomes as revealed at the diffuse stage of meiosis. Hereditas 88: 243–253.
Klášterská, I. & A.T. Natarajan (1974a). Cytological studies of the genus Rosa with special reference to the section Caninae. Hereditas 76: 97–108.
Klášterská, I. & A.T. Natarajan (1974b). The role of the diffuse stage in the cytological problems of meiosis in Rosa. Hereditas 76: 109–116.
Klášterská, I. & A.T. Natarajan (1976). A modified C-band technique for staining of diffuse diplotene chromosomes. Stain Technol. 51: 209–211.
Klášterská, I., A.T. Natarajan & C. Ramel (1976). New observations on mammalian mouse meiosis. I. Laboratory mouse (Mus musculus) and Rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Hereditas 83: 203–214.
Lacadena, J.R. & A.M. Vazquez (1971). Sequentional analysis of meiotic prophase in pollen mother cells of rye, Secale cereale L. Genet. iber. 23: 95–116.
Lewitsky, G.A. (1927). Die Bildung bivalenter Chromosomen in der Gonogenese von Beta vulgaris L. Planta 3: 100–114.
Maguire, M.P. (1960). A study of homology between a terminal portion of Zea chromosome 2 and a segment derived from Tripsacum. Genetics 45: 195–209.
Menzel, M.Y. (1962). Pachytene chromosomes of the intergeneric hybrid Lycopersicon esculentum x Solanum lycopersicoides. Am. J. Bot. 49: 605–615.
Moens, P.B. (1964). A new interpretation of meiotic prophase in Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato). Chromosoma 15: 231–242.
Moens, P.B. (1968). The structure and function of the synaptonemal complex in Lilium longiflorum sporocytes. Chromosoma 23: 418–451.
Moses, M.J. (1968). Synaptinemal complex. Ann. Rev. Genet. 2: 363–412.
Nagl, W. (1969). The course of the first meiotic prophase in Beta procumbens and in the F1 between B. vulgaris and B. procumbens. Theoret. Appl. Genet.39: 356–360.
Oksala, T. & E. Therman (1958). The polarized stages in the meiosis of liliaceous plants. Chromosoma: 505–513.
Oud, J.L., J.H.de Jong & D.G.de Rooij (1979). A sequentional analysis of meiosis in the male mouse using a restricted spermatocyte population obtained by a hydroxyurea/triaziquone treatment. Chromosoma 71: 237–248.
Tischler, G. (1951). Allgemeine Pflanzenkaryologie. 2. In: 2 ed. Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie. Ed. K. Linsbauer. 011 Naturwissenschaftlicher Verlag, Berlin.
Wilson, E.B. (1925). The cell in development and heredity. 3 ed. MacMillan, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klášterská, I., Ramel, C. Prophase of plant meiosis: Sequences and interpretation of stages. Genetica 51, 15–20 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139493
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139493