Abstract
Criticized for its generally positivist and technocratic orientation, the literature of public policy analysis has begun to generate proposals that would create a convergence between the field and the wider movement for a post-positivist restructuring of social inquiry. Ironically, critics have often focused on “policy science” as the epitomy of positivism and technocracy, giving little attention to the actual position of the figure responsible for the term - Harold D. Lasswell. Centering on Lasswell's key concept of contextual orientation, this article argues that, despite positivist influences, he developed an approach to inquiry and a proposal for a policy science profession which together clearly transcend positivism and technocracy- which, indeed, anticipate recent post-positivist proposals. Implications for policy analysis of a project of contextual orientation are also considered, along with problems in Lasswell's focus on professionalization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amy, Douglas J. (1984a). “Toward a post-positivist policy analysis,” Policy Studies Journal 13: 207–211.
Amy, Douglas J. (1984b). “Why policy analysis and ethics are incompatible,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 3: 573–591.
Apel, Karl-Otto (1972). “The a priori of communication and the foundation of the humanities,” Man and World 5: 3–37.
Apel, Karl-Otto (1980), Towards a Transformation of Philosophy. Glyn Adey and David Frisby (trs.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Aucoin, Peter (1979). “Public-policy theory and analysis,” in G. Bruce Doern and Peter Aucoin (eds.), Public Policy in Canada: Organization, Process and Management. Toronto: Macmillan of Canada, 1–26.
Bachrach, Peter (1967). The Theory of Democratic Elitism: A Critique. Boston: Little, Brown.
Bardes, Barbara A., and Dubnick, Melvin J. (1980). “Motives and methods in policy analysis,” in Stuart S. Nagel (ed.), Improving Policy Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 101–127.
Beneviste, Guy (1984). “On a code of ethics for policy experts,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 3: 561–572.
Bernstein, Richard J. (1976). The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Birnbach, Martin (1961). Neo-Freudian Social Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Brown, Peter G. (1976). “Ethics and policy research,” Policy Analysis 2: 225–240.
Carter, Robert E. (1984). Dimensions of Moral Education. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Crick, Bernard (1960). The American Science of Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dobyns, Henry F., Paul L. Doughty and Harold D. Lasswell (eds.) (1971). Peasants, Power, and Applied Social Change: Vicos as a Model. Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage Publications.
Dror, Yehezkel (1971). “Policy analysis: a new professional role in government service.” In his Ventures in Policy Sciences. New York: American Elsevier, pp. 225–233.
Dror, Yehezhkel (1975). “From management sciences to policy sciences,” in Michael J. White et al. (eds.), Management and Policy Science in American Government. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, pp. 269–295.
Dryzek, John (1982). “Policy analysis as a hermeneutic activity,” Policy Sciences 14: 309–329.
Dye, Thomas R. (1978). “Oligarchic tendencies in national policy-making: the role of private policy-planning organizations,” Journal of Politics 40: 309–333.
Easton, David (1950). “Harold Lasswell: policy scientist for a democratic society,” Journal of Politics 12: 450–477.
Eulau, Heinz (1958). “H. D. Lasswell's developmental analysis,” The Western Political Quarterly 11: 229–241.
Eulau, Heinz (1969). “The maddening methods of Harold D. Lasswell: some philosophical under-pinnings,” in Arnold A. Rogow (ed.), Politics, Personality and Social Science in the Twentieth Century: Essays in Honor of Harold D. Lasswell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 15–40.
Fay, Brian (1975). Social Theory and Political Practice. London: George Alien and Unwin.
Fischer, Frank (1980). Politics, Values and Public Policy: The Problem of Methodology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
French, Richard D. (1984). How Ottawa Decides: Planning and Industrial Policy Making 1969–1984. Toronto: James Lorimer, 2nd ed.
Foster, John L. (1981). “Professional models for policy analysis,” Administration and Society 12: 379–397.
Germino, Dante (1967). Beyond Ideology: The Revival of Political Theory. New York: Harper and Row.
Giddens, Anthony (1972). New Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Basic Books.
Habermas, Jürgen (1970). “Toward a theory of communicative competence,” Inquiry 13: 360–375.
Habermas, Jürgen (1971a). Knowledge and Human Interests. Jeremy J. Shapiro (tr.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jürgen (1971b). Toward a Rational Society. Jeremy J. Shapiro (tr.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jürgen (1977). “A review of Gadamer's Truth and Method,” in Fred R. Dallmayr and Thomas McCarthy (eds.), Understanding and Social Inquiry. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 335–363.
Held, David (1980). Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Horowitz, Irving Louis (1970). “Social science mandarins: policymaking as a political formula,” Policy' Sciences 1: 339–360.
Horwitz, Robert (1962). “Scientific propaganda: Harold D. Lasswell,” in Herbert J. Storing (ed.), Essays on the Scientific Study of Politics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 227–304.
Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. (1982). “Professional roles for policy analysts: a critical assessment,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 2: 88–100.
Kariel, Henry S. (1969). Open Systems: Arenas for Political Action. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock Publishers.
Kariel, Henry S. (1972). “Commentary on Lane's paper,” in James C. Charlesworth (ed.), Integration of the Social Sciences through Policy Analysis. Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science, pp. 103–108.
Kramer, Fred A. (1977). “Policy analysis as ideology,” in Fred A. Kramer (ed.), Perspectives on Public Bureaucracy. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers, 2nd ed., pp. 203–220.
Larson, Magali Sarfatti (1977). The Rise of Professionalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1928). “The function of the propagandist,” International Journal of Ethics 38: 258–268.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1938). “What psychiatrists and political scientists can learn from one another,” Psychiatry 1: 33–39.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1941). Democracy through Public Opinion. Menasha, WI: George Banta Publishing Company.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1947a). “The garrison state and specialists on violence,” in his The Analysis of Political Behaviour: An Empirical Approach. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 146–157.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1947b). “Legal education and public policy: professional training in the public interest,” in his The Analysis of Political Behaviour: An Empirical Approach. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 21–119.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1951a). “Democratic character,” in his The Political Writings of Harold D. Lasswell. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, pp. 465–525.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1951b). “The policy orientation,” in Daniel Lerner and Harold D. Lasswell (eds.), The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope and Method. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 3–15.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1955). “Current studies of the decision process: automation versus creativity,” The Western Political Quarterly 8: 381–399.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1956). “Impact of psychoanalytic thinking on the social sciences,” in Leonard D. White (ed.), The State of the Social Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 84–115.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1958a). “Clarifying value judgment: principles of content and procedure,” Inquiry 1: 87–98.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1958b). Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: Meridian Books.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1961). “The qualitative and the quantitative in political and legal analysis,” in Daniel Lerner (ed.), Quantity and Quality. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, pp. 103–116.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1962). “The public interest: proposing principles of content and procedure,” in Carl J. Friedrich (ed.), The Public Interest. New York: Atherton Press, pp. 54–79.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1965a). World Politics and Personal Insecurity. New York: The Free Press.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1965b). “The world revolution of our time: a framework for basic policy research,” in Harold D. Lasswell and Daniel Lerner (eds.), World Revolutionary Elites: Studies in Coercive Ideological Movements. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 29–96.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1968). “Policy sciences,” International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 12: 181–189.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1970a). “The emerging conception of policy sciences,” Policy Sciences 1: 3–14.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1970b). “Must science serve political power?” American Psychologist 25: 117–123.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1971). A Pre-View of Policy Sciences. New York: American Elsevier.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1974a). “The future of professional political scientists,” in Albert Somit (ed.), Political Science and the Study of the Future. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press, pp. 246–254.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1974b). “Some perplexities of policy theory,” Social Research 14: 176–189.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1976). Power and Personality. New York: W. W. Norton.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1977). Psychopathology and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1980). “The future of world communication and propaganda,” in Harold D. Lasswell et al. (eds.), Propaganda and Communication in World History, Vol. 3. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii, pp. 516–534.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1981). “The interconnections of political power, psychotherapy, and world community,” Political Communication and Persuasion 1: 107–125.
Lasswell, Harold D. et al. (1949). Language of Politics: Studies in Quantitative Semantics. New York: George Stewart.
Lasswell, Harold D. and Abraham Kaplan (1950). Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lasswell, Harold D. and Daniel Lerner (1965). “Foreword,” in their World Revolutionary Elites: Studies in Coercive Ideological Movements. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. v-vii.
Lewin, Arie Y. and Shakun, Melvin F. (1976). Policy Sciences: Methodology and Cases. New York: Pergamon Press.
Lieberman, Jethro K. (1970). The Tyranny of Experts: How Professionals Are Closing the Open Society. New York: Walker.
Lukács, Georg (1971). History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Rodney Livingstone (tr.). London: Merlin Press.
McCarthy, Thomas (1978). The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Marvick, Dwaine (1977). “Introduction: context, problems, and methods,” in Dwaine Marvick (ed.), Harold D. Lasswell on Political Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–72, 397–443.
Meltsner, Arnold J. (1980). “Creating a policy analysis profession,” in Stuart S. Nagel (ed.), Improving Policy Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 235–249.
Moon, J. Donald (1975). “The logic of political inquiry: a synthesis of opposed perspectives,” in Fred I. Oreenstein and Nelson W. Polsby (eds.), Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 1. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, pp. 131–228.
Paris, David C., and Reynolds, James F. (1983). The Logic of Policy Inquiry. New York: Longman.
Peters, R.S. (1973). Reason and Compassion. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Phidd, R. W. (1982). “The administrative state and the limits of rationality,” in O. P. Dwivedi (ed.), The Administrative State in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 233–250.
Simon, Herbert A. (1977). The New Science of Management Decision. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, rev. ed.
Smith, Bruce Lannes (1969). “The mystifying intellectual history of Harold D. Lasswell,” in Arnold A. Rogow (ed.), Politics, Personality and Social Science in the Twentieth Century: Essays in Honor of Harold D. Lasswell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 41–105.
Rogow, Arnold A., ed. (1969). Politics, Personality and Social Science in the Twentieth Century: Essays in Honor of Harold D. Lasswell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rubenstein, Robert, and Harold D. Lasswell (1966). The Sharing of Power in a Psychiatric Hospital. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Taylor, Charles (1971). “Interpretation and the sciences of man,” Review of Metaphysics 25: 3–51.
Taylor, Charles (1973). “Neutrality in political science,” in Alan Ryan (ed.), The Philosophy of Social Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 139–170.
Torgerson, Douglas (1980). Industrialization and Assessment: Social Impact Assessment as a Social Phenomenon. Toronto: York University Publications in Northern Studies.
Torgerson, Douglas (1981). “SIA as a social phenomenon: the problem of contextuality,” in Frank J. Tester and William Mykes (eds.), Social Impact Assessment: Theory, Method and Practice. Calgary: Detselig, pp. 68–92.
Torgerson, Douglas (1984). “The communicative context of policy analysis: the problem of strategic interaction in the policy process,” Ph. D. Thesis, University of Toronto. Toronto.
Tribe, Laurence H. (1972). “Policy science: analysis or ideology?” Philosophy and Public Affairs 2: 66–110.
van Gunsteren, Herman R. (1976). The Quest for Control: A Critique of the Rational-Central-Rule Approach in Public Affairs. London: John Wiley and Sons.
Weber, Max (1968). The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch (trs.). New York: The Free Press.
White, Jay D. (1982). “Public policy analysis: reason, method, and praxis,” D.P.A. Thesis, George Washington University. Washington, D.C.
Wildavsky, Aaron (1966). “The political economy of efficiency: cost-benefit analysis, systems analysis, and program budgeting,” Public Administration Review 26: 292–310.
Wolfe, Alan (1970). “The professional mystique,” in Marvin Surkin and Alan Wolfe (eds.), An End to Political Science: The Caucus Papers. New York: Basic Books, pp. 288–309.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Torgerson, D. Contextual orientation in policy analysis: The contribution of Harold D. Lasswell. Policy Sci 18, 241–261 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138911
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138911