Abstract
My four years at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) have provided the opportunity for some participant observation among the Energy Tribes. The uncertainties that envelop trends in energy supply and demand are so wide that the exploratory mode (asking “What would you like the facts to be?”) turns out to be more rewarding than the adversary mode (asking “What are the facts?”). The three Energy Tribes are distinguished by their three contradictory scenarios: “Business as Usual,” “Middle of the Road” and “Radical Change Now.” Each scenario sets very different bounds on what is credible and incredible, possible and impossible, sensible and foolish, rational and irrational.
More often than not, the name of any particular tribe turns out to mean simply “the people” in the language of that tribe. Each tribe, seeing itself as the repository of everything that is human, consigns all the others to a sort of unmenschionable limbo. That, in essence, is what has happened in energy policy analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Caputo, Richard (1983). Personal communication and “Worlds in collision: is a rational energy policy possible for W. Europe?” Futures 16(3): 233–259.
Chapman, Peter (1975). Fuel's Paradise: Energy Options for Britain. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Dickens, Charles. David Copperfield. Harmondsworth: Penguin edition, 1966.
Douglas, Mary and Wildavsky, Aaron (1982). Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gaskell, George (1983). In a paper presented at a conference in Cambridge (England) on “Human factors and energy use in buildings,” 5–6 September. Proceedings to be published by John Wiley, Chichester.
Harman, Willis, Reuyl, John S., Carlson, Richard C., Levine, Mark D. and Witwer, Jeffrey G. (1977). Solar Energy in America's Future. Second edition. Stanford Research Institute. (The first author on the report was Reuyl but Harman was the principal author of the section devoted to perceptions.)
Humphrey, Craig R. and Buttel, Frederick H. (1980). “The sociology of the growth/ no growth debate,” Policy Studies (5): 336–345.
Orr, David W. (1977). “US energy policy and the political economy of participation,” The Journal of Politics 41: 1027–1056.
Po Chü-i (circa 835a) “A mad poem addressed to my nephews and nieces,” Translated (circa 1918) by Arthur Waley. Republished in Allott, Kenneth (Ed.) (1950), Contemporary Verse. London: Penguin.
Po Chü-i (circa 835b). “The chrysanthemums in a eastern garden,” Allott (1950), op.cit.
Roberts, Marc J. (1974). “The limits of the limits to growth,” in L. Waverman (Ed.), The Energy Question. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
Schanz, John J. Jr. (1978). “Oil and gas resources - welcome to uncertainty,” Resources, No. 58 (Special Issue, March). Resources for the Future.
Spronk, Jaap and Veeneklaas, Frank (1983). “A feasibility study of economic and environmental scenarios by means of interactive multiple goal programming,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 13: 141–160.
Thompson, Michael (1982). “Among the energy tribes: the anthropology of the current policy debate.” Working Paper, WP-82–59, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, A-2361, Laxenburg, Austria.
Thompson, Michael (1983). “Postscript: a cultural basis for comparison,” in H. C. Kunreuther, J. Linnerooth, et al., Risk Analysis and Decision Processes: The Siting of Liquefied Energy Gas Facilities in Four Countries. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Thompson, Michael and Wildavsky, Aaron (1982). “A proposal to create a cultural theory of risk;” in H. Kunreuther and E. V. Ley (Eds.), The Risk Analysis Controversy: An Institutional Perspective. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Weinberg, Alvin (1972). “Science and trans-science,” Minerva 10: 209–222.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thompson, M. Among the Energy Tribes: A cultural framework for the analysis and design of energy policy. Policy Sci 17, 321–339 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138710
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138710