Abstract
We use 1987 data to study the household demand for access to the telephone system. Previous analyses find demand to be highly inelastic and, therefore, predict that local rate increases will have little impact on the goal of providing universal telephone service. We estimate that price has a considerably stronger effect on access demand, especially at low incomes, and argue that elasticities increased in the 1980s. But our evidence also suggests that the structure of telephone rates matter: where local measured service is available, changes in flat rate prices have no effect on access demand.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell Canada. 1988 “Cross Sectional Analysis of Residential Telephone Subscription in Canada.” Unpublished report.
Brown, Stephen J., and David S. Sibley. 1986. The Theory of Public Utility Pricing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Congressional Budget Office. 1984. The Changing Telephone Industry: Access Charges, Universal Service, and Local Rates. Washington, D.C.: The Congress of the United States.
Fuhr, Joseph P. 1986. “Maintaining Universal Telephone Service Under Deregulation.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 5:583–590.
Gordon, Kenneth, and John Haring. 1984 “Do Recent FCC Telephone Rate Reforms Threaten Universal Service?” Patrick C. Mann, and Harry M. Trebing, eds., Changing Patterns in Regulation, Markets, and Technology:The Effect on Public Utility Pricing. E. Lansing: MSU Institute of Public Utilities.
Griffin, James M., and Thomas H. Mayor. 1987. “The Welfare Gain from Efficient Pricing of Local Telephone Services.” The Journal of Law and Economics 30 (October): 465–496.
Hills, Jill. 1989. “Universal Service: Liberalization and Privatization of Telecommunications Services.” Telecommunications Policy, 9:129–144.
Johnson, Leland L. 1988. Telephone Assistance Programs for Low Income Households: A Preliminary Assessment. RAND Report R-3603-NSF/MF, The RAND Corporation. Santa Monica, CA, February 1988.
Kahn, Alfred E., and William B. Shew. 1987. “Current Issues in Telecommunications Regulation: Pricing.” Yale Journal of Regulation, 4 (Spring): 191–256.
Kaserman, David L., John W. Mayo, and Joseph E. Flynn. 1990. “Cross-Subsidization in Telecommunications: Beyond the Universal Service Fairy Tale,” Journal of Regulatory Economics 2 (September):231–250.
Lande, James L. 1987 “Local Rates Update.” Unpublished manuscript. Federal Communications Commission, Common Carrier Bureau, Industry Analysis Division.
Lande, James L. and Peyton L. Wynns. 1987 “Primer and Sourcebook on Telephone Price Indexes and Rate Levels.” Unpublished manuscript. Federal Communications Commission, Common Carrier Bureau, Industry Analysis Division.
Levin, Stanford, and J. Cale Case. 1988. “Local Measured Service: Advantages and Implementation.” Telecommunications Policy, 8, pp. 27–35.
Mitchell, Bridger M. “Optimal Pricing of Local Telephone Service.” American Economic Review 68 (December 1978): 517–537.
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC), 1987, Bell Operating Companies Exchange Service Telephone Rates, Dec. 31, (1987) Washington, D.C.: NARUC.
Park, Rolla E., and Bridger M. Mitchell. 1989. Local Telephone Pricing and Universal Telephone Service. RAND Report No. R-3724-NSF. The RAND Corporation. Santa Monica, CA, June.
Perl, Lewis J. 1978. Economic and Demographic Determinants of Residential Demand for Basic Telephone Service. New York: National Economic Research Associates.
Perl, Lewis J. 1984. Residential Demand for Telephone Service: Preliminary Results of a New Model. In Patrick C. Mann, and Harry M. Trebing, eds.. Changing Patterns in Regulation Markets and Technotogy:The Effect on Public Utility Pricing. E. Lansing: MSU Institute of Public Utilities.
Perl, Lewis J. 1986. Welfare Gains from Cost Based Telephone Pricing. New York: National Economic Research Associates.
Perl, Lewis J., and William E. Taylor. 1990 “Telephone Penetration and Universal Service in the 1980s.” Unpublished manuscript, National Economic Research Associates.
Pike, Robert, and Vincent Mosco. 1986. “Canadian Consumers and Telephone Pricing.” Telecommunications Policy, 5:17–32.
Taylor, Lester D. 1980. Telecommunications Demand: A Survey and Critique (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.)
Train, K. E., D. L. McFadden, and M. Ben-Akiva. 1987. “The Demand for Local Telephone Service: A Fully Discrete Model of Residential Calling Patterns and Service Options.” Rand Journal of Economics 18:109–123.
Vietor, Richard H. K., and Dekkers L. Davidson. 1985. “Economics and Politics of Deregulation: The Issue of Telephone Access Charges.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 5:3–22.
Wenders, John T., and Bruce L. Egan. 1986. “The Implications of Economic Efficiency for U.S. Telecommunications Policy.” Telecommunications Policy (March): 33–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cain, P., Macdonald, J.M. Telephone pricing structures: The effects on universal service. J Regul Econ 3, 293–308 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138470
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138470