Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Origin of the species and genus concepts: An anthropological perspective

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adanson, M. 1764. Familles des plantes. 2 vols. Paris: Vincent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertus Magnus. 1955. De natura et origine animae, de principiis motus processivi, quaestiones super de animalibus. Vol. XII of Opera omnia.: Monasterri Westfalorum.

  • Aquinas, Th. 1946. Tractatus de unitate intellectus contra Averroistas. Rome: Gregorian University.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1955. Somme théologique [Summa theologiae]. Translated by A.-M. Rouget. 6 vols. Paris: Desclée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arber, A. 1950. The Natural Philosophy of Plant Form. Darien, Conn.: Hafner.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1953. “From Medieval Herbalism to the Birth of Modern Botany.” In Science, Medicine and History, ed. E., Underwood, pp. 317–336. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1908–1931. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Edited by J. A. Smith and W. D. Ross. 11 vols. Vol. I: Analytica priora, trans. A Jenkinson, and Analytica posteriora, trans. G. Mure [1928]; vol. IV: Historia animalium, trans. D. Thompson [1910]; vol. V: De partibus animalium, trans. W. Ogle [1912]; vol. VIII: Metaphysica, trans. W. Ross [1928].

  • 1963. Categories [Categoriae] and De interpretatione. Translated by J. Ackrill. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1975. On the soul [De anima]. Translated by W. Hett. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1980. The physics [physica]. 2 vols. Translated by P. Wicksteed and F. Cornford. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S. 1983. “Covert Fragmenta and the Origins of the Botanical Family.” Man, 18:51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1985a. “The Nature of Folkbotanical Life-forms.” Amer. Anthrop.87:298–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1985b. “Pre-theoretical Aspects of Aristotelian Definition and Classification of Animals: The Case for Common Sense.” Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci., 16:113–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986. Fondements de l'historie naturelle. Pour une anthropologie de la science. Brussells: Complexe.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1987. “Folkbiological Universals as Common Sense.” In Noam Chomsky: Consensus and Controversy, ed. S., Modgil and C., Modgil, pp. 247–268. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard, G. 1980. La formation de l'esprit scientifique. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balme, D. 1980. “Aristotle's Biology Was Not Essentialist.” Arch. Geschichte Phil.62:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, H. 1926. “Sumatran Plants in Asahan and Karoland, With Notes on Their Vernacular Names.” Mich. Acad. Sci. Arts Let., 6:1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1935. “The Batak Lands of North Sumatra.” Natural Appli. Sci. Bull., 4:211–323. (University of the Philippines.)

    Google Scholar 

  • 1940. “History of the Generic Concept in Botany.” Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 47:319–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauhin, C. 1623. Pinax theatri botanici. Basel: Regis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B. 1972. “Speculations on the Growth of Ethnobotanical Nomenclature.” Lang. Soc., 1:63–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1973. “The Relation of Folk Systematics to Biological Classifications and Nomenclature.” Ann. Rev. Syst. Ecol., 4:259–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1978. “Ethnobiological Classification.” In Cognition and Categorization, ed. E., Rosch and B., Lloyd, pp. 9–26. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B. 1982a. “Predicting Discontinuities in Ethnobiological Classification.” Paper presented at the Department of Anthropology Faculty Seminar, November 22, 1982, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Berlin, B. 1982b. “Natural and Not-so-natural Higher-order Categories in Ethnobotanical Classification.” Paper read before the Anthropology Section of the New York Academy of Sciences, April 26, 1982, New York.

  • Berlin, B.; Boster, J.; and O'Neill, J. 1981. “The Perceptual Basis of Ethnobiological Classification: Evidence from Aguaruna Folk Ornithology.” J. Ethnobiol., 1:95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B.; Breedlove, D.; and Raven, P. 1973. “General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology.” Amer. Anthrop., 75:214–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1974. Principles of Tzeltal Plant Classification. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, H. 1957. “Tournefort et la médicine.” In Tournefort, ed. R., Heims, pp. 97–103. Paris: Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwelder, R. 1967. Taxonomy. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, H. 1539. Kreütter Buch. Strasbourg: W. Rihelius.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1552. De stirpium. Strasbourg: W. Rihelius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W. 1973. “Philosophical Foundations of Classical Evolutionary Taxonomy.” Syst. Zool., 22:375–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, R., 1667. The Origine of Formes and Qualities. 2nd ed. Oxford: Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremekamp, C. 1953. “A Re-examination of Cesalpino's Classification.” Acta Bot. Neerl., 1:580–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretzl, H. 1903. Botanische Forschungen des Alexanderzuges. Leipzig: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. 1977. “Folk Botanical Life-forms: Their Universality and Growth.” Amer. Anthrop., 79:317–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979. “Folk Zoological Life-forms: Their Universality and Growth.” Amer. Anthrop., 81:791–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1984. Language and Living Things: Uniformities in Folk Classification and Naming. New Brunswick, N. J. Rutgers University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunfels, O. 1530–1536. Herbarum vivae eicones. Strasbourg: Schottu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffon, G.-L. 1749. Histoire naturelle générale et particulière, vol. I. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, R. 1970. “Which Came First, the Chicken or the Egg-head?” In Échanges et communications: Mélanges offerts à Claude Lévi-Strauss, ed. J., Pouillon and P., Maranda, pp. 1069–91. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1974. “Folk Biology in the New Guinea Highlands.” Soc. Sci. Info., 13:9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979. “Kalam Classification of Birds.” In Classifications in Their Social Contexts, ed. R., Ellen and D., Reason, pp. 57–79. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, R., and Tyler, M 1968. “Karam Classification of Frogs.” J. Polynesian Soc., 77:333–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burma, B 1949. “The Species Concept: A Semantic Review.” Evolution, 3:369–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, A. 1956. “The Genus in Evolutionary Taxonomy.” Syst. Zool., 5:97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, A. 1959. “The Post-Linnaean Development of Taxonomy.” Proc. Linn. Soc. London, 170:234–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candolle, A.-P. 1833. “Note sur la division du règne végétal en quatre embranchements.” Bibl. Universelle Genève Sci. Arts18:259–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. 1978. “The Child's Concept of ‘Animal.’” Paper presented to the Psychonomic Society, San Antonio, Texas.

  • Cassirer, E. 1906. Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft de neueren Zeit. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesalpino, A. 1571. Questionum peripateticorum libri quinque. Venice: Juntas.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1583. De plantis libri XVI. Florence: Marescot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, C. 1984. “Taxonomy: What's in a Name?” Nat. Hist., 93:30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordus, V. 1561. Valerii Cordi Simesusij Annotationes in Pedacij Dioscoridis Anazerabei de medica materia libros V [Historia plantarum]. Edited by C., Gesner. Strasbourg: J. Rihelius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croizat, L. 1945. “History and Nomenclature of the Higher Units of Classification.” Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 72:52–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A. 1968. The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, J. 1968. “Botanical Problems of Numerical Taxonomy.” In Modern Methods in Plant Taxonomy, ed. V., Heywood, pp. 175–183. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuvier, G. 1812. “Sur un nouveau rapprochement à établir entre les classes qui composent le règne animal.” Muséum d'Historie Naturelle de Paris, Annales, 19:73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1883. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. 6th ed. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daudin, H. 1926–1927. Cuvier et Lamarck: Les classes zoologiques et l'idée de série animale (1790–1830). 2 vols. Paris: Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P., and Heywood, V. 1963. Principles of Angiosperm Taxonomy. New York: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beer, G., ed. 1960, 1967. “Darwin's Notebooks on Transmutation of Species.” Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), 2:27–200; 3:129–176. (Notebooks B, C, D, E.)

  • Descartes, R. 1907 [1637]. Discours de la méthode. Paris: Cerf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. 1966. “Zoological Classification of a Primitive People.” Science, 15:1102–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1972. The Avifauna of the Eastern Highland of New Guinea. Cambridge, Mass.: Nuttall Ornithological Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dioscorides. 1959. The Greek Herbal of Dioscorides, Illustrated by a Byzantine A.D. 712, Englished by John Goodyer A.D. 1655. Ed. R., Gunther. New York: Hafner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diver, C. 1940. “The Problem of Closely Related Species Living in the Same Area.” In The New Systematics. ed. T., Huxley, pp. 301–328. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodoens, R. 1583. Stirpium historiae. Antwerp: Plantini.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorolle, M. 1929. Introduction to Césalpin, questions péripatéticiennes. Paris: Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, J. 1979. “Learning Names for Plants and Plants for Names.” Anthrop. Linguistics, 21:298–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dughi, R. 1957. “Tournefort dans l'histoire de la botanique.” In Tournefort, ed. R., Heim, pp. 131–185. Paris: Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E., and Mauss, M. 1963 [1903]. Primitive Classification. Trans. R. Needham. Chicago: Chicago University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, P. 1976a. “An Analysis of Rofaifo Mammal Taxonomy.” Amer. Ethnol., 3:425–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1976b. “Beetles, Butterflies, and Bats: Species Transformation in New Guinea Folk Classification.” Oceania, 14:188–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmart, E. 1940. The Badianus Manuscript: An Aztec Herbal. Baltimore: (Originally composed in 1552.)

  • Farber, P. 1982a. “The Transformation of Natural History in the Nineteenth Century.” J. Hist. Biol., 15:145–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1982b. The Emergence of Ornithology as a Scientific Discipline, 1760–1850. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. 1970. “Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge.” Minnesota Stud. Phil. Sci., 4:17–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1970 [1966]. The Order of Things. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedberg, C. 1970. “Analyse de quelques groupements de végétaux comme introduction à l'étude de la classification botanique bunaq.” In Échanges et communications: Mélanges offerts à Claude Lévi-Strauss, vol. II, ed J., Pouillon and P., Maranda, pp. 1092–1130. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1972. “Éléments de botanique bunaq.” In Langues et techniques: Nature et société, vol. II, Approche ethnologique et naturaliste, ed. J., Barrau, pp. 375–393. Paris: Klincksieck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedberg, C. 1982. Les Bunaq de Timor et les Plantes, vol. IV MUK GUBUL NOR “La Chevelure de la Terre.” Thèse d'État, Université de Paris V.

  • Fuchs, L. 1542. De historia stirpium. Basel: Insengrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1543. Neu Kreüterbuch. Basel: Insengrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galileo, G. 1623. Il Saggiatore. Rome: Mascardi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gesner, C. 1584. Epistolarum medicinalium. Wittenberg: Gronenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1972. Conradi Gesneri historia plantarum. Zurich: U. Graf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N. 1963. “Galileo and the School of Padua.” J. Hist. Phil., 1:223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour, J., and Walters, S. 1964. “Philosophy and Classification.” In Vistas in Botany, vol. IV, Recent Researches in Plant Taxonomy, ed. W., Turrill, pp. 1–22. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotthelf, A. 1976. “Aristotle's Conception of Final Causality.” Rev. Metaphys., 30:226–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, E. 1983. Landmarks of Botanical History, 2 vols. Stanford: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyénot, E. 1941. Les sciences de la vie au XVII e et XVIIIe siècles. Paris: Albin Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, W. 1981 [1651]. Disputations Touching the Generation of Animals [De generatione animalium]. Trans. G. Whitteridge. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, T. 1976. “An Empirical Method for the Identification of Covert Categories in Ethnobiology.” Amer. Ethnol., 3:489–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983. “Ndumba Folk Biology and General Principles of Ethnobotanical Classification and Nomenclature.” Amer. Anthrop., 85:592–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, M. 1985. “Darwin, Species, and the Theory of Natural Selection.” Paper presented to Colloque International: “Histoire du Concept d'Espèce dans les Sciences de la Vie,” Fondation Singer-Polignac, Paris, May 28–31, 1985.

  • Hull, D. 1965. “The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy — Two Thousand Years of Stasis. Part 1.” Brit. J. Phil. Sci., 15:314–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunn, E. 1975a. “Cognitive Processes in Folk Ornithology: The Identification of Gulls.” Language-Behavior Research Laboratory, Working Paper No. 42, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1975b. “A Measure of the Degree of Correspondence of Folk to Scientific Biological Classification.” Amer. Ethnol., 2:309–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1976. “Toward a Perceptual Model of Folk Biological Classification.” Amer. Ethnol., 3:508–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inger, R. 1958. “Comment on the Definition of Genera.” Evolution, 12:370–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglis, W. 1966. “The Observational Basis of Homology.” Syst. Zool., 15:219–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, F. 1973 [1970]. The Logic of Life. Trans. B. Spillman. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. 1980. “Revolutions in Plant Description.” In Liber gratulatorius in honorem H. C. D. De Wit, ed. J., Arends, G., Boelema, C., de, Groot, and A., Leeuwenberg, pp. 155–181. Wageningen: H. Veenman and Zonen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, N. 1969. “A Logical Basis for Biological Classification.” Syst. Zool., 18:37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1976. “Galileo's Road to Truth and the Demonstrative Regress.” Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci.7:277–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaume Saint-Hilaire, J. H. 1805. Exposition des familles naturelles. 2 vols. Paris: Treuttel and Würtz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joly, R. 1968. “La biologie d'Aristote.” Rev. philos., 158:219–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, J. 1747 [1662]. Opuscula botanico-physica. Ed. M., Fogel and J., Vagetius . Coburg: Ottonis. (The Isagoge phytoscopica was originally complied in 1678–1679 and De plantis doxoscopiae in 1662.)

    Google Scholar 

  • 1982. Praelectiones physicae. Historisch-Kritische Edition, ed. Christoph, Meinel. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jussieu, A.-L. 1789. Genera plantarum. Paris: Herissant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kästner, H. 1896. “Pseudo-Dioscorides De herbis femininis.” Hermes, 31:578–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, F. 1979. Semantic and Conceptual Development: An Ontological Perspective. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesby, J. 1979. “The Rangi Classification of Animals and Plants.” In Classifications in Their Social Contexts, ed. R., Ellen and D., Reason, pp. 33–56. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamarck, J.-B. 1758. Mémoire sur les classes les plus convenables à établir parmi les végétaux. Mémoires de l'Académie des Sciences, année 1758, pp. 437–453.

  • 1809. Philosophie zoologique. Paris: Dentu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landgraf, E. 1928. “Ein frühmittelaltericher Botanicus.” Kyklos, 1:3–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenox, J. 1980. “Aristotle on Genera, Species, and ‘The More and the Less.’” J. Hist. Biol., 13:321–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H.-L. 1974. “Plant Taxonomy and the Origin of Cultivated Plants.” Taxon, 23:715–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus, C. 1737a. Genera plantarum. Leiden: Wishoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1737b. Critica botanica. Leiden: Wishoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1751. Philosophia botanica. Stockholm: Kiesewetter.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1787. Philosophia botanica. 4th ed. Geneva: Pietre and Dellamolière.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1790 [1760]. Disquisitio de sexu plantarum. In Amoenitates academicae, vol. X, pp. 100–131. Erlangen: Schreber. (Originally presented as the prize essay of the Imperial Academy of St. Petersburg in 1760.)

    Google Scholar 

  • 1972 [1744]. Discours sur l'accroissement de la terre habitable [Oratio de Telluris habitabilis incremento]. In L'équilibre de la nature, trans. B. Jasmin, pp. 29–55. Paris: Vrin. (Originally published in Latin in 1744, subsequently in the Amoenitates academicae, vol. II.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, G. 1968. Aristotle: The Growth and Structure of His Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. 1848 [1689]. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: Tegg.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. 1972. Geographical Ecology: Patterns in the Distribution of Species. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macnamara, J. 1982. Names for Things: A Study of Human Learning. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnol, P. 1689. Prodromus historiae generalis plantarum. Montpellier: Pech.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1969. Principles of Systematic Zoology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinel, C. 1984a. In physicis futurum saeculum respicio: Joachim Jungius und die Naturwissenschaftliche Revolution des 17 Jahrhunderts. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1984b. Der handschriftliche Nachlass von Joachim Jungius in der Staats-und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg. Katalog. Stuttgart: Ernst Hauswedell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinel, C. 1985. “Révolution scientifique et expérience en chimie: méthodologie et réforme chez Joachim Jungius vers 1630”. Paper presented to Colloque International: “Hélène Metzger”, Centre International de Synthèse, Paris, May 21–23, 1985.

  • Meyer, E. 1854–1857. Geschichte der Botanik. 4 vols. Köningsberg: Bornträger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milt, B. 1936. “Conrad Gessner's ‘Historia plantarum’ (Fragmenta relicta)”. Vierteljahrs. naturforsch. Ges. Zürich, 81:285–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morison, R. 1669. Praeludia botanica. London.

  • 1672. Plantarum umbelliferarum distributio nova. Oxford: Sheldonian.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1680–1699. Plantarum historiae universalis Oxiensis. Vols. II–III. Oxford: Sheldonian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, A. 1981. History of Botanical Science. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, J. 1986. Science and Civilisation in China. Vol. VI(1), Botany. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R. 1866. The Anatomy of Vertebrates. Vol. I, Fishes and Reptiles. London: Longman, Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paso y Trancoso. F. 1886. “La botanica entre los Nahuas”. Anales Mus. Nac. Mexico, 3.

  • Pline [Pliny]. 1829. Histoire naturelle de Pline [Historiarum Mundi]. 20 vols. Paris: Panckoucke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. 1966. “Three Grades of Modal Involvement”. In W., Quine, The Ways of Paradox, pp. 174–184. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, J. 1940. “The Development of Scientific Method in the School of Padua”. J. Hist. Ideas, 1:177–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, C. 1942. John Ray Naturalist, His Life and Works. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P. 1976. “Systematics and Plant Population Biology”. Syst. Bot., 1:284–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P.; Berlin, B.; and Breedlove, D. 1971. “The Origins of Taxonomy”. Science174:1210–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, J. 1660. Catalogous plantarum circa Cantabrigiam nascentium. Cambridge: Field.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1682. Methodus plantarum nova. London: Faithorne and Kersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1686. Historia plantarum. London: Smith and Walford.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1691. The Wisdom of God Manifested in the Works of Creation. London: Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1693. Synopsis methodica animalium quadrupedum & serpentini. London: Smith and Walford.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1696a. Synopsis methodica stirpium Britanicarum. London: Smith and Walford.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1696b. De variis plantarum methodus dissertatio brevis. London: Smith and Walford.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1703. Methodus plantarum emendata et aucta. London: Smith and Walford.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1848. The Correspondence of John Ray. Edited by E., Lankester. London: Ray Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, C. 1926. “Organic evolution”. Presidential Address, Section D. British Association for the Advancement of Science, 1925.

  • Riddle, J. 1981. “Pseudo-Dioscorides' Ex herbis femininis and Early Medieval Medical Botany”. J. Hist. Biol., 14:43–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivinus, A. [Bachmann]. 1690. Introductio generalis in rem herbariam. Leipzig: Günther.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. 1890 [1875]. History of Botany (1530–1860). Trans. H. Garnsey. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, W. 1958. Seals, Sea Lions, and Walruses. Stanford: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, C. 1927. “The Herbal in Antiquity”. J. Hellenic Stud., 47:1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1959. A History of Biology. New York: Abelard-Schuman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skulsky, H. 1968. “Paduan Epistemology and the Doctrine of the One Mind”. J. Hist. Phil., 6:341–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, P. 1972. “John Locke, John Ray, and the Problem of the Natural System”. J. Hist. Biol., 5:1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. 1975. “Pourquoi les animaux parfaits, les hybrides et les monstres sont-ils bons à penser symboliquement?” L'Homme, 15:5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, T. 1928. “The Herbal of Otto Brunfels”. J. Linn. Soc. London, 48:79–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1940. “Taxonomic Botany, with Special Reference to the Angiosperms”. In The New Systematics, ed. T., Huxley, pp. 435–453. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, T., and Sprague, M. 1939. “The Herbal of Valerius Cordus”. J. Linn. Soc. London, 52:1–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprengel, K. 1817–1818. Geschichte der Botanik. 2 vols. Altenberg: Brockhaus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearn, W. 1957. “An Introduction to the Species plantarum and Cognate Botanical Works of Carl Linnaeus”. In Species plantarum. A Facsimile of the first edition, 1753. vol. I, pp. 1–176. London: Ray Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, P. 1984a. “Metaphors and Typology in the Development of Botanical Systematics 1690–1960, or The Art of Putting New Wine in Old Bottles”. Taxon, 33:169–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1984b. “Haüy and A.-P. de Candolle: Crystallogrpahy, Botanical Systematics, and Comparative Morphology, 1780–1840”. J. Hist. Biol.17:49–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. 1696. “Why is the Pueraria a Sweet Potato?” Ethnology, 8:189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stross, B. 1973. “Acquisition of Botanical Terminology by Tzeltal Children”. In Meaning in Mayan Languages, ed. M., Edmonson, pp. 107–141. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. 1978–1979. “Preliminary Report on the Ethnobiology of the Tobelorese of Hamalhera, North Moluccas”. Majalah Ilmu-ilmu Sastra Indonesia, 8:215–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1984. “Covert Categories' Reconsidered: Identifying Unlabeled Classes in Tobelo Folk Biological Classification”. J. Ethnobiol., 4:105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theophrastus. 1968. Enquiry into Plants [Historia plantarum]. Trans. A Hort. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tournefort, J.-P. 1694. Élémens de botanique. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1697. De optima methodo instituenda in re herbaria. Epistola. In quä respondetur Dissertationi D. Raii de variis plantarum methodus. Paris: Jardin du Roi.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1708. Materia medica, or a Description of Simple Medicines Generally Used in Physick ... Their Operating and Acting upon Human Bodies According to the Principles of the New Physiology, Chymistry and Mechanism. London: Bell. (Lessons given at the Jardin du Roi, Paris, and first published in English.)

    Google Scholar 

  • 1717. Relation d'un voyage au Levant. 3 vols. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1719. Institutiones rei herbariae. 3rd ed. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vines, S. 1913. “Robert Morison and John Ray”. In Makers of British Botany, ed. F., Oliver, pp. 8–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigts, L. 1978. “The Signficance of the Name Apuleius to the Herbarium Apulei”. Bull. Hist. Med., 52:214–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, S. 1961. “The Shaping of Angiosperm Taxonomy”. New Phytologist, 60:70–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellisch, H. 1975. “Conrad Gessner: A bio-bibliography”. J. Soc. Bibliog. nat. Hist., 7:151–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharburton, F. 1967. “The Purposes of Classification”. Syst. Zool., 16:241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, J. 1668. Essay Towards a Real Character and Artificial Language. London: The Royal Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabarella, G. 1608. Iacobi Zabarellae Patavini opera logica. Frankfurt: Zetzneri.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. C.N.R.S. UA 882 Laboratoire d'Ethnobiologie-Biogéographie, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France

    Scott Atran

Authors
  1. Scott Atran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atran, S. Origin of the species and genus concepts: An anthropological perspective. J Hist Biol 20, 195–279 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138437

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138437

Keywords

Search

Navigation