Abstract
Most of the analysis of costs associated with the introduction of risky prospects has concerned contingent costs amenable to insurance programs. An important missing element is the current cost associated with changes in uncertainty. These costs are not amenable to insurance plans and require compensation in order to prevent transfers. In a novel approach, this paper develops an application of prospect theory to such questions, in an intergenerational context. The importance of such an application is demonstrated in a case study of the high-level nuclear waste repository (HNWR) siting decision. As a case study, the costliness of obtaining some elements of the analysis leads to a simulation approach, comparing prospect costs at the three sites that were under consideration by the U.S. Department of Energy. Finding that such costs can be large, we argue for a reassessment of current risk analysis approaches. On a policy note, on the basis of the prospect cost analysis here, the choice of the Yucca Mountain, Nevada, HNWR site seems ill-advised.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bjorkman, M., 1987. Time and risk in the cognitive space. In L. Sjoberg (ed.), pp. 13–36, Risk and Society (London: Allen and Unwin).
Dunford, R., Faas, R., and Wandschneider, P., 1986. Risk of economic loss due to failure or perceived failure of a high-level nuclear waste repository. Manuscript, Washington State University.
Einhorn, H., and Hogarth, R., 1981. Behavioral decision theory: processes of judgement and choice. Annual Review of Psychology 32: 53–88.
Hageman, R., 1981. Nuclear waste disposal: potential property value impacts. Natural Resources Journal 21: 789–810.
Jones-Lee, M., 1974. The value of changes in the probability of death or dying. Journal of Political Economy 82: 835–850.
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A., 1973. On the psychology of prediction. Psychology Review 80: 237–251.
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A., 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica 42: 263–291.
Kunreuther, H., Kleindorfer, P., Knez, P., and Yaksick, R., 1987. A compensation mechanism for siting noxious facilities: theory and experimental design. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14: 1–13.
Schulze, W., Brookshire, D., and Sandler, T, 1981. The social rate of discount for nuclear waste disposal: economics or ethics? Natural Resources Journal 21:811–832.
Slovic, P., Kunreuther, H., and White, G., 1974. Decision Processes, rationality, and adjustment to natural hazards. In G. White (ed.), pp. 187–205, Natural hazards. Local, national, global (New York: Oxford University Press).
Slovic, P., Fischoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S., 1976. In J. Carroll and J. Payne (eds.), pp. 165–184, Cognition and Social Behavior (Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum).
Smith, V., and Desvouges, W., 1986a. Asymmetries in the valuation of risk and the siting of hazardous waste disposal facilities. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 76: 291–294.
Smith, V., and Desvouges, W., 1986b. The valuation of environmental risks and hazardous waste policy. Manuscript, Vanderbilt University.
Smith, V., and Desvouges, W., 1987. An empirical analysis of the economic value of risk changes. Journal of Political Economy 95: 89–114.
U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE), 1980. Final environmental impact statement: management of commercially generated radioactive waste. Volume 1. Report DOE/EIS-0046F (Washington, D.C.: National Technical Information Services, October).
U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE), 1984a. Draft environmental assessment: reference repository location, Deaf Smith county site, Texas. Report DOE/RW-0014 (Washington, D.C.: National Technical Information Services).
U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE), 1984b. Draft environmental assessment: reference repository location, Handford site, Washington. Report DOE/RW-0017 (Washington, D.C.: National Technical Information Services).
U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE), 1984c. Draft environmental assessment: reference repository location, Yucca Mountain site, Nevada research and development area, Nevada. Report DOE/RW-0012 (Washington, D.C.: National Technical Information Services).
Weinstein, M., Shepard, D., and Pliskin, J., 1980. The economic value of changing mortality probabilities: a decision-theoretic approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics 94: 373–396.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosenman, R., Fort, R. & Budd, W. Perceptions, fear, and economic loss: an application of prospect theory to environmental decision making. Policy Sci 21, 327–350 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138307
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138307