Skip to main content
Log in

Perceptions, fear, and economic loss: an application of prospect theory to environmental decision making

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most of the analysis of costs associated with the introduction of risky prospects has concerned contingent costs amenable to insurance programs. An important missing element is the current cost associated with changes in uncertainty. These costs are not amenable to insurance plans and require compensation in order to prevent transfers. In a novel approach, this paper develops an application of prospect theory to such questions, in an intergenerational context. The importance of such an application is demonstrated in a case study of the high-level nuclear waste repository (HNWR) siting decision. As a case study, the costliness of obtaining some elements of the analysis leads to a simulation approach, comparing prospect costs at the three sites that were under consideration by the U.S. Department of Energy. Finding that such costs can be large, we argue for a reassessment of current risk analysis approaches. On a policy note, on the basis of the prospect cost analysis here, the choice of the Yucca Mountain, Nevada, HNWR site seems ill-advised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bjorkman, M., 1987. Time and risk in the cognitive space. In L. Sjoberg (ed.), pp. 13–36, Risk and Society (London: Allen and Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunford, R., Faas, R., and Wandschneider, P., 1986. Risk of economic loss due to failure or perceived failure of a high-level nuclear waste repository. Manuscript, Washington State University.

  • Einhorn, H., and Hogarth, R., 1981. Behavioral decision theory: processes of judgement and choice. Annual Review of Psychology 32: 53–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hageman, R., 1981. Nuclear waste disposal: potential property value impacts. Natural Resources Journal 21: 789–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Lee, M., 1974. The value of changes in the probability of death or dying. Journal of Political Economy 82: 835–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A., 1973. On the psychology of prediction. Psychology Review 80: 237–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A., 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica 42: 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, H., Kleindorfer, P., Knez, P., and Yaksick, R., 1987. A compensation mechanism for siting noxious facilities: theory and experimental design. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W., Brookshire, D., and Sandler, T, 1981. The social rate of discount for nuclear waste disposal: economics or ethics? Natural Resources Journal 21:811–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Kunreuther, H., and White, G., 1974. Decision Processes, rationality, and adjustment to natural hazards. In G. White (ed.), pp. 187–205, Natural hazards. Local, national, global (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S., 1976. In J. Carroll and J. Payne (eds.), pp. 165–184, Cognition and Social Behavior (Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V., and Desvouges, W., 1986a. Asymmetries in the valuation of risk and the siting of hazardous waste disposal facilities. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 76: 291–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V., and Desvouges, W., 1986b. The valuation of environmental risks and hazardous waste policy. Manuscript, Vanderbilt University.

  • Smith, V., and Desvouges, W., 1987. An empirical analysis of the economic value of risk changes. Journal of Political Economy 95: 89–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE), 1980. Final environmental impact statement: management of commercially generated radioactive waste. Volume 1. Report DOE/EIS-0046F (Washington, D.C.: National Technical Information Services, October).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE), 1984a. Draft environmental assessment: reference repository location, Deaf Smith county site, Texas. Report DOE/RW-0014 (Washington, D.C.: National Technical Information Services).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE), 1984b. Draft environmental assessment: reference repository location, Handford site, Washington. Report DOE/RW-0017 (Washington, D.C.: National Technical Information Services).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE), 1984c. Draft environmental assessment: reference repository location, Yucca Mountain site, Nevada research and development area, Nevada. Report DOE/RW-0012 (Washington, D.C.: National Technical Information Services).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M., Shepard, D., and Pliskin, J., 1980. The economic value of changing mortality probabilities: a decision-theoretic approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics 94: 373–396.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenman, R., Fort, R. & Budd, W. Perceptions, fear, and economic loss: an application of prospect theory to environmental decision making. Policy Sci 21, 327–350 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138307

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138307

Keywords

Navigation