Skip to main content
Log in

Success and failure of freshmen at university: a search for determinants

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores the relationships between achievement at university and self-reported characteristics of students and their social environment. Subjects were 240 college freshmen. They were interviewed twice. The first interview covered their social and study experiences during the first semester, and the second one dealt with the preparation of the final examinations in the first year. Determinants of academic achievement were selected on the basis of significant correlations (p<.01) with the grades obtained from the final examinations in the freshmen year. The findings revealed that midterm performance was most strongly related with final examination grades. Next in order were academic self-esteem, expectancies and efficiency of study strategies. Other personal factors such as study effort, interest in the study option, ability to understand lectures, prior knowledge and fear of exams were identified as moderate determinants; followed by external determinants such as help from others, information on exams and exam difficulty which were weakly associated with achievement. Unlike previous research, this study attempts to provide an overall framework of the characteristics that determine learning outcome based on the intercorrelations. Multidimensional scaling analyses revealed that characteristics are structured along two main dimensions: causal locus (internal vs. external) and control (controllable vs. uncontrollable). Overall, the findings corroborate the associations reported in previous studies on determinants of academic attainment. Similarities between the present data and attributional studies on causes of student outcome, as well as potential implications and limitations for remedial purposes, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biggs, J. B. (1978). “Individual and group differences in study processes.” British Journal of Educational Psychology, 48, 266–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1979). “Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes.” Higher Education, 8, 381–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1985). “The role of metalearning in study process.” British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 185–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, I., & Lingoes, J. C. (1980). “A model and algorithm for multidimensional scaling with external restrictions on the distances.” Psychometrika, 45, 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C. H. (1964). A theory of data, New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decruyenaere, M., (1987). Een structureel model ter verklaring van studieprestaties op niveau eerste kandidatuur. [A structural model for individual differences in academic performance of freshmen]. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Louvain, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elchardus, M. (1979). Een internationale beroepsclassificatie en een gestandaardiseerde internationale beroepsprestigeschaal. Ministerie van Volksgezondheid en Gezin, C.B.G.S. rapport.

  • Elig, T. W., & Frieze, I. H. (1979). “Measuring causal attributions for success and failure.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 621–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N., Hanley, M., & Hounsell, D. (1979). “Identifying distinctive approaches to studying.” Higher Education, 8, 365–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., & Kozéki, B. (1985). “Relationships between school motivation, approaches to studying, and attainment, among British and Hungarian adolescents.” British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 124–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findley, M. J., & Cooper, H. M. (1983). “Locus of control and academic achievement: A literature review.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 419–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J., Walberg, H. J., Welch, W. W., & Hattie, J. A. (1987). “Syntheses of educational productivity research.” International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 145–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansford, B. C., & Hattie, J. (1982). “The relationship of selfconcept and achievement/performance measures.” Review of Educational Research, 52, 123–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ide, J. C., Perkenson, J., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1980). “Peer influences.” Evaluation in Education, 4, 111–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, B. K., & Walberg, H. J. (1982). “Home environment and school learning: A quantitative synthesis.” Journal of Experimental Education, 50, 144–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacante, M. F. E. (1983). “Van intelligentie, persoonlijkheid, studiestrategie, en studeergedrag naar studieresultaat. [From intelligence, personality, study strategies, and study behavior to study performance.]” Pedagogische Studieën, 60, 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingoes, J. C. (1973). The Guttman-Lingoes nonmetric program series. Ann Arbor, Mathesis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingoes, J. C., & Borg, I. (1983). A mathematical decision model for the Lingoes-Borg criteria in testing the equivalence hypothesis. University of Michigan, Computer Centre, Technical report, 1, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabe, P. A., & West, S. C. (1982). “Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 280–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). “On qualitativo differences in learning: 1 - outcome and process.” British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. (1985). “Self-monitoring of attained subgoals in private study.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 623–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T. (1980). “Student-faculty informal contact and college outcomes.” Review of Educational Research, 50, 545–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1979). “Interaction effects in Spady's and Tinto's conceptual models of college dropout.” Sociology of Education, 52, 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1983). “Predicting voluntary freshmen year persistence- withdrawal behavior in a residential university; A path analytic validation of Tinto's model.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Cross, D. R., Kozma, R. B., & McKeachie, W. J. (1986). “Instructional psychology.” Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 611–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P., & Entwistle, N. J. (1981). “Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying.” British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). “Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.” Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E. (1986). “Individual differences and the design of educational programs.” American Psychologist, 41, 1029–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinissen, J. (1987). De overgang van secundair naar hoger onderwijs. Rapport 3: Doorstromen en slagen [Transition from secondary to tertiary education. Report nr. 3: Change and success]. Leuven, Belgium: Acco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theyssens, B. (1982). Vragenlijst studie-attitude, lijst 1. [Study attitude scale, 1.] Unpublished manuscript, EDUCO, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uguroglu, M. E., & Walberg, H. J. (1979). “Motivation and achievement: A quantitative synthesis.” American Educational Research Journal, 16, 375–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Overwalle, F. (1984). “An application of multidimensional scaling on prediction: the radex-structure.” In De Greef, E., & Van Buggenhaut, J. (Eds.) Trends in mathematical psychology. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1979). “A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1985). “An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion.” Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellens, J. (1980). De predictie van het studieresultaat in het hoger onderwijs: een terreinverkenning. [Prediction of study outcome in higher education: An exploratory review.] Unpublished report, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, K. R. (1982). “The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement.” Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461–481.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Overwalle, F. Success and failure of freshmen at university: a search for determinants. High Educ 18, 287–308 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138185

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138185

Keywords

Navigation