Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The implementation of school finance reform

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reform of educational finance systems is underway in various states. The results of the reforms in early states can act as guides to the design of new finance systems in other states. Based on recent experiences in New Jersey, the authors discuss the role that policy analysis can play in aiding the school finance reform process. The results of the New Jersey reform suggest that the policy analyst must understand the behavioral responses of school districts to new aid and must take into account likely changes in the underlying economic conditions of local areas if he or she hopes to accurately assess the impacts of alternative finance proposals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barro, S. M. (1972). Theoretical Models of School District Expenditure Determination and the Impact of Grants-in-Aid. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, K. (1979). “The Fiscal Distress of Cities”. Mimeograph. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazer, H. (1975). “A cost adjustment index for Michigan School Districts,” Selected Papers in School Finance. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, S. J. (1979). The Search for Equity in School Finance: Summary and Conclusions. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courant, P. N., E. M. Gramlich, and D. L. Rubinfeld (1979). “The stimulative effect of intergovernmental grants: or why money sticks where it hits,” in P. Mieszkowski and W. Oakland (eds:), Fiscal Federalism and Grants-in-Aid. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crecine, J. (1967). “A computer simulation model of municipal budgeting.” Management Sciences 13: 786–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Pasquale, D. (1979). “State Aid to Local School Districts: A Comparative Analysis.” Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Feldstein, M. S. (1975). “Wealth, neutrality and local public choice in public education,” American Economic Review 65: 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goertz, M. E. (1978). Money and Education: Where Did the 400 Million Dollars Go? Princeton: Education Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurwitz, A. (1977). The Financial Condition of Urban School Districts: A Federal Policy Perspective. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman, R. P. (1977). “Micro-fiscal planning in the regional economy: a general equilibrium approach,” Journal of Public Economics 7: 237–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman, R. P. (1978). “Optimal fiscal reform of metropolitan schools: Some simulation results.” American Economic review 68: 107–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knickman, J. and A. Reschovsky (1980). “Fiscal Stress and School District Responses to Inter-governmental Aid.” Proceedings of the Seventy-Second Annual Conference on Taxation, Oklahoma: National Tax Association - Tax Institute of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, H. F. (1975). “Local education expenditures, fiscal capacity, and the composition of the property tax base.” National Tax Journal 28: 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehne, R. (1978). Quest for Justice. New York: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. (1974). “Public policies for private profit: urban governments.” in Hochman and G. E. Peterson (eds.), Redistribution through Public Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, R. P. and Adams, C. (1976). “Understanding central city hardship,” Political Science Quarterly, 91: 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netzer, D. (1974). “State education aid and school tax efforts in large cities,” Selected Papers on School Finance. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Jersey Supreme Court (1976). Robinson v. Cahill. 355 A2d 192-189.

  • Niskanan, W. A. (1975). “Bureaucrats and politicians,” The Journal of Law and Economics 18:617–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reschovsky, A. and Knickman, J. (1976). “Municipal overburden in New Jersey: an assessment,” New Jersey Urban Education Research Reports, No. 2. Trenton: New Jersey Urban Education Observatory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, J. A. (1968). “The expenditure effects of grants-in-aid programs,” National Tax Journal 21: 340–348.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knickman, J.R., Reschovsky, A. The implementation of school finance reform. Policy Sci 12, 301–315 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138158

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138158

Keywords

Navigation