Skip to main content
Log in

A case history of the application of social judgment theory to policy formulation

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social judgment theory provides (1) a theoretical framework for understanding the origin of policy quarrels and (2) methods for their resolution. Social judgment theory asserts that differences in policy are often cognitive in origin. Such cognitive differences are produced by the highly interdependent aspects of the more or less unreliable environments within which policies are made. Discussion alone is often insufficient for resolving policy differences because the covert, inconsistent nature of human judgment prevents individuals from accurately describing their cognitive processes. Consequently, judgmental aids, such as computer graphics technology and input-output analysis, are necessary in order to externalize and thus to clarify the causes of disagreement. Social judgment theory, computer graphics technology, and input-output analysis were successfully employed both in formulating an agency-wide policy as well as specifying how this policy would be implemented. Empirical support for the theoretical position was thus obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balke, W. M., Hammond, K. R. and Meyer, G. D. (1973). “An Alternative Approach to Labor-Management Negotiations,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 311–327.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hammond, K. R. and Brehmer, B. (1973). “Quasi-Rationality and Distrust: Implications for International Conflict,” in L. Rappoport and D. A. Summers (eds.) Human Judgment and Social Interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rittel, H. W. J. and Weber, M. W. (1973). “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning,” Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wildavsky, A. (1973a). “If Planning is Everything, Maybe It's Nothing,” Policy Sciences, 4, 127–153.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wildavsky, A. (1973b). “Consumer Report.” (Review of Politicians, Bureaucrats, and the Consultant by Garry D. Brewer). Science, 182 1335–1338.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hammond, K. R. (1966). “Probabilistic Functionalism: Egon Brunswik's Integration of the History, Theory and Method of Psychology,” in K. R. Hammond (ed.), The Psychology of Egon Brunswik. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Flack, J. E. and Summers, D. A. (1971). “Computer Aided Conflict Resolution in Water Resource Planning: An Illustration,” Water Resources Research, 7, 1410–1414.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hammond, K. R. (1974). “Human Judgment and Social Policy.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Colorado, Institute of Behavioral Science, Program of Research on Human Judgment and Social Interaction, Report No. 170.

  9. Hammond, K. R. (1971). “Computer Graphics as an Aid to Learning,” Science, 172, 903–908.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Slovic, P. and Lichenstein, S. (1973). “Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approach to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment,” in L. Rappoport and D. A. Summers (eds.) Human Judgment and Social Interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lindblom, C. E. (1971). “Strategies for Decision Making.” Presented as the 1971 Edmund J. James Lecture on Government, University of Illinois.

  12. Hammond, K. R., Hursch, C. and Todd, F. J. (1964). “Analyzing the Components of Clinical Inference,” Psychological Review, 71, 438–456.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, T. H. (1973). “A Method for Improving Human Judgment.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado.

  14. Stewart, T. R., West, R. E., Hammond, K. R. and Kreith, F. “Improving human judgment in technology assessment.” Technology Assessment, 1974, 2 (4), in press.

  15. Leontief, W. W. (1951a). The Structure of American Economy, 1919–1939. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leontief, W. W. (1951b). “Input-Output Economics,” Scientific American, 185 (4), 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smithies, A. (1969). “Programs, Objectives, and Decision Making,” in H. H. Hinrichs and G. M. Taylor (eds.) Program Budgeting and Benefit-Cost Analysis. Pacific Palisades, California: Goodyear Publishing Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Terleckyj, N. E. (1970). “Measuring Progress toward Social Goals: Some Possibilities at National and Local Levels,” Management Science, 16 (12), 765–778.

    Google Scholar 

  19. McMillan, C. and Stewart, T. R. (1974). “Goal Programming and Policy-Capturing.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Colorado.

  20. Johnson, S. C. (1967). “Hierarchical Clustering Schemes,” Psychometrika, 32 (3), 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hammond, K. R. (1965). “New Directions in Research on Conflict Resolution,” Journal of Social Issues, 21, 44–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is based on research supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grant No. MH-16437 and is Publication #173 of the Program of Research on Human Judgment and Social Interaction, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado. The authors would like to thank D. Wayne Osgood, John Rohrbaugh, and Derick Steinmann for their advice throughout the course of this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adelman, L., Stewart, T.R. & Hammond, K.R. A case history of the application of social judgment theory to policy formulation. Policy Sci 6, 137–159 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138031

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138031

Keywords

Navigation