Abstract
An analysis of child care regulations in Germany, Sweden, and the United States reveals distinctive national policy styles. A ‘social constructionist’ perspective, with its emphasis on variable problem definitions, helps to explain such differences. However, a full understanding of regulatory differences requires attention to regulatory solutions as well. By disaggregating the concept of regulation, we are able to demonstrate rather different rank-orderings of our three countries in their regulatory solutions. We attribute these differences to cultural, institutional, and political characteristics of the three countries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abt Associates (1978). National Day Care Study: Preliminary Findings and Their Implications. Cambridge, MA. January 31.
Adams, Gina (1990). Who Knows How Safe? The Status of State Efforts to Ensure Quality Child Care. Washington, D.C.: Children's Defense Fund.
Anon (1992). ‘Record numbers of women to take statehouse seats.’ Washington Post. November 22: 4.
Bardach, Eugene and Robert Kagan (1982). Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Best, Joel (1989). Images of Issues. Berlin: Aldine de Gruyter.
Brickman, Ronald, Sheila Jasanoff, and Thomas Ilgen (1985). Controlling Chemicals: The Politics of Regulation in Europe and the U.S. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Dahn, Daniela (1990). ‘Ohne Frauen ist kein Staat zu machen.’ Paper delivered at the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies. Washington, D.C., April 7.
Dery, David (1984). Problem Definition in Policy Analysis. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
Edelman, Murray (1967). The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Esping-Anderson, Gosta (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fund for the Feminist Majority (1988–89). Feminist Majority Report 1 (3).
Gormley, William, Jr. (1990). ‘Regulating Mister Rogers, Neighbourhood: The Dilemmas of Day Care Regulation,’ The Brookings Review 8 (4): 21–28.
Gormley, William, Jr. (1991) ‘State Regulations and the Availability of Child-Care Services,’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 10 (1): 78–95.
Hayes, Cheryl et al. (1990). Who Cares for America's Children? Child Care Policy for the 1990s. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Heidenheimer, Arnold, Hugh Heclo, and Carolyn Adams (1975). Comparative Public Policy: The Politics of Social Choice in Europe and America. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Hertzke, Allen and Mary Scribner (1989). ‘The politics of federal day care: the nexus of family, church and the positive state.’ A paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta. August 31–September 3.
Hilgartner, Stephen and Charles Bosk (1988). ‘The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model,’ American Journal of Sociology 94 (1): 53–78.
Kamerman, Sheila (1991). ‘Starting Right: What We Owe to Children Under Three,’ The American Prospect 4 (Winter): 63–73.
Kamerman, Sheila and Alfred Kahn (1991). ‘Child and Family Benefits: East and West.’ A paper presented at the Conference on the Changing Structure of Income and Social Policy in Eastern Europe, Walferdange, Luxembourg, July 21–23.
Kamerman, Sheila and Alfred Kahn (1981). Child Care, Family Benefits, and Working Parents. New York: Columbia University Press.
Katzenstein, Peter (1987). Policy and Politics in West Germany. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Kelman, Steven (1981). Regulating America, Regulating Sweden: A Comparative Study of Occupational Safety and Health Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Linder, Stephen and B. Guy Peters (1989). ‘Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts,’ Journal of Public Policy 9, Part 1: 35–58.
Mansbridge, Jane (1986). Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Milner, Andrew (1990). Sweden: Social Democracy in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morgan, Gwen (1987). The National State of Child Care Regulation 1986. Watertown, MA: Work/Family Directions.
Nelson, Barbara (1984). Making an Issue of Child Abuse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Peters, B. Guy (1989). The Politics of Bureaucracy, 3rd ed. New York: Longman.
Reisman, Barbara, Amy Moore, and Karen Fitzgerald (1988). Child Care: The Bottom Line. New York: Child Care Action Campaign.
Richardson, Jeremy, ed. (1982). Policy Styles in Western Europe. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Rokkan, Stein (1966). ‘Norway: Numerical Democracy and Corporate Pluralism,’ in Robert Dahl, ed. Political Opposition in Western Democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Sacks, Jeffrey et al. (1989). ‘The Epidemiology of Injuries in Atlanta Day-Care Centers,’ Journal of the American Medical Association 262 (12): 1641–1645.
Schneider, Joseph (1985). ‘Social Problems: The Constructionist View,’ Annual Review of Sociology 11: 209–229.
Thomas, Sue (1991). ‘The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies,’ Journal of Politics 53 (4): 958–976.
Vandell, Deborah et al. (1988). ‘A Longitudinal Study of Children with Day-Care Experiments of Varying Quality,’ Child Development 59 (5): 1286–1292.
Vogel, David (1986). National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the U.S. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Weber-Nau, Monica (1990). ‘Wohin mil den Kindern?’ Stern, December: 80–92.
Weir, Margaret, Ann Orloff, and Theda Scocpol (1988). ‘Introduction: Understanding American Social Politics,’ in Margaret Weir, Ann Orloff and Theda Scocpol, eds. The Politics of Social Policy in the U.S. Princeton: Princeton University Press: 3–27.
Weisbrod, Burton (1988). The Nonprofit Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Willer, Barbara et al. (1991). The Demand and Supply of Child Care in 1990. Washington, D.C.: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gormley, W.T., Peters, B.G. National styles of regulation: Child care in three countries. Policy Sci 25, 381–399 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138020
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138020