Skip to main content
Log in

The “good professor” as perceived by university instructors

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to answer the question: What is the Israeli instructor's conception of a “good university professor?” The study deals with the instructor's conception of the characteristics of the “good professor” with regard to the department in which he is teaching. A sample of 51 instructors from two departments were asked to select the three most important characteristics of a “good university professor” from a list of fifteen.

It was shown that instructors attached primary importance to the professor's ability to spark intellectual growth. Of secondary importance was his method of instruction. The professor's traits connected to his academic status and his personality were of relatively little concern.

There was unanimity among instructors from the two departments in their conception of what a “good professor” should be. They singled out characteristics that fall under the heading of delivery.

A disparity exists between the instructor's conception of the “good professor” and the students' conception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bayer, A. E. (1973). Teaching Faculty in Academe: 1972–73. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. (1980). Determining Faculty Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, K. P. (1977). “Not can, but will college teaching be improved?” in J. A. Centra (Ed.), Renewing and Evaluating teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, R., and Williams, H. (1972). “College faculty view themselves and their jobs.” Unpublished manuscript, College of Education, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaff, J. G., and Wilson, R. C. (1971). “Faculty values and improving teaching,” in G. K. Smith (Ed.), Current Issues in Higher Education 1971: New Teaching, New Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W. (1981). “The role of evaluation in teaching,” in A. Lewy and D. Nevo (Eds.), Evaluation Roles in Education. New York: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. B. (1977). “Learning and the instructional system,” in J. A. Centra (Ed.), Renewing and Evaluating Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miron, M., and Segal, E. (1978) “‘The good university teacher’ as perceived by the students,” Higher Education 7: 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miron, M. The “good professor” as perceived by university instructors. High Educ 14, 211–215 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137485

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137485

Keywords

Navigation