Abstract
Any piece of policy analysis must be appropriate to the context of its intended use. Social science often fails as policy analysis due to insensitivity to context. This paper explores a number of different modes of policy analysis to determine the circumstances in which the application of each is appropriate. It is argued that each mode is appropriate only under a fairly limited set of conditions; many of the problems policy analysis encounters are a result of attempts to apply a mode outside its niche. Greater use should be made of what is developed here as a hermeneutic model of policy analysis, appropriate in a residual set of conditions which none of the traditional models of policy analysis copes with adequately.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison, Graham T. (1971). Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
Anderson, Charles W. (1979). “The Place of Principles in Policy Analysis,” American Political Science Review 73: 711–723.
Banfield, Edward C. (1970). The Unheavenly City. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
Berger, Thomas R. (1977). Northern Frontier, Northern Homeland. Toronto: James Lorimer.
Bernstein, Richard (1976). The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
Beveridge, Sir William Henry (1942). Social Insurance and Allied Services. London: H.M.S.O.
Bleicher, Joseph (1980). Contemporary Hermeneutics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Brown, Peter and MacLean, Douglas (eds.) (1979). Human Rights and U.S. Foreign Policy. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Castells, Manuel (1977). The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
Commoner, Barry (1971). The Closing Circle. New York: Knopf.
Cook, Thomas D. et al. (1978). Evaluation Studies Review Annual Vol. 3. Beverley Hills: Sage.
Dror, Yehezkel (1971a). Design for Policy Sciences. New York: American Elsevier.
Dror, Yehezkel (1971b). Ventures in Policy Sciences. New York: American Elsevier.
Dunn, William N. (1981). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Durrell, Lawrence (1957 et seq.). Justine, Balthazar, Mountolive, Clea (The Alexandria Quartet). New York: Dutton.
Fischer, Frank (1980). Politics, Values, and Public Policy: The Problem of Methodology. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, (1975). Truth and Method. New York: Seabury.
Giddens, Anthony (1976). New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. New York: Basic Books.
Goodin, Robert E. (1980). “No Moral Nukes,” Ethics 90: 417–449.
Habermas, Jurgen (1970). “Towards a Theory of Communicative Competence,” Inquiry 13: 360–375.
Habermas, Jurgen (1971). Knowledge and Human Interests (translated by Jeremy J. Shapiro). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Hardin, Garrett (1972). Exploring New Ethics for Survival. New York: Viking.
Horkheimer, Max (1972). Critical Theory. New York: Seabury Press.
Jencks, Christopher (1972). Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effects of Family and Schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.
Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London: MacMillan.
Kneese, Allen V. and Schultze, Charles L. (1975). Pollution, Prices, and Public Policy. Washington D.C.: Brookings.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1951). “The Policy Orientation,” in Daniel Lerner and Harold D. Lasswell (eds.), The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope and Method. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1971). A Pre-View of Policy Sciences. New York: American Elsevier.
Lerner, Daniel and Lasswell, Harold D. (eds.) (1951). The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope and Method. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lindblom, Charles L. (1959). “The Science of Muddling Through,” Public Administration Review 19: 79–88.
Lindblom, Charles L. and Cohen, David K. (1979). Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lowi, Theodore J. (1969). The End of Liberalism. New York: Norton.
Lowi, Theodore J. et al. (1975). Poliscide: Science and Federalism versus the Metropolis. New York: MacMillan.
MacRae, Duncan Jr. (1976). The Social Function of Social Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Masterman, Margaret (1970). “The Nature of a Paradigm,” in Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 59–89.
Meltsner, Arnold J. (1976). Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Moynihan, Daniel P. (1965). The Negro Family, Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.
Myrdal, Gunnar (1944). An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy, New York: Harper.
Nelson, Richard, R. (1977). The Moon and the Ghetto. New York: Norton.
Pressman, Jeffrey and Wildavsky, Aaron ( 1973). Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Prybyla, Jan S. (1969). Comparative Economic Systems. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Rawls, John (1951). “Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics,” Philosophical Review 60: 177–197.
Rawls, John (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rein, Martin (1976). Social Science and Public Policy. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Rein, Martin and White, Sheldon H. (1977). “Can Policy Research Help Policy?” The Public Interest 49: 119–136.
Rivlin, Alice (1973). “Forensic Social Science,” in Perspectives on Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Review Reprint Series No. 8.
Schelling, Thomas C. (1978). Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: Norton.
Schuman, David (1982). Policy Analysis, Education, and Everyday Life: An Empirical Reevaluation of Higher Education in America. Lexington, MA: Heath.
Siegel, Karolynn and Doty, Pamela (1979). “Advocacy Research versus Management Review: A Comparative Analysis,” Policy Analysis 5: 37–65.
Sikora, R. I. and Barry, Brian (eds.) (1978). Obligations to Future Generations. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Titmuss, Richard (1974). The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. New York: Pantheon.
Tribe, Laurence, H. (1976). “Ways Not to Think About Plastic Trees,” in Laurence H. Tribe, Corinne S. Schelling, and John Voss (eds.), When Values Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 61–92.
Unger, Roberto (1975). Knowledge and Politics. New York: Free Press.
Weiss, Carol H. (1977). “Research for Policy's Sake: The Enlightenment Function of Social Research,” Policy Analysis 3: 531–546.
Wiener, Norbert (1948). Cybernetics. New York: Wiley.
Wildavsky, Aaron (1979a). Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
Wildavsky, Aaron (1979b). The Politics of the Budgetary Process, 3rd edition. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
Williams, Walter and Evans, John W. (1972). “The Politics of Evaluation: The Case of Head Start,” in Peter H. Rossi and Walter W. Williams (eds.), Evaluating Social Programs, New York: Seminar Press, pp. 249–264.
Young, Oran, R. (1977). Resource Management at the International Level: The Case of the North Pacific. New York: Nichols.
Young, Oran R. (1982). Resource Regimes: Natural Resources and Institutional Design. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dryzek, J. Policy analysis as a hermeneutic activity. Policy Sci 14, 309–329 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137394
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137394