Landscape Ecology

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 111–133 | Cite as

A review of models of landscape change

  • William L. Baker


Models of landscape change may serve a variety of purposes, from exploring the interaction of natural processes to evaluating proposed management treatments. These models can be categorized as either whole landscape models, distributional landscape models, or spatial landscape models, depending on the amount of detail included in the models. Distributional models, while widely used, exclude spatial detail important for most landscape ecological research. Spatial models require substantial data, now more readily available, via remote sensing, and more easily manipulated, in geographical information systems. In spite of these technical advances, spatial modelling is poorly developed, largely because landscape change itself is poorly understood.

To facilitate further development of landscape models I suggest (1) empirical multivariate studies of landscape change, (2) modelling of individual landscape processes, (3) explicit study of the effect of model scale on model behavior, and (4) ‘scaling-up’ results of studies, on smaller land areas, that have landscape relevance.


Models landscape change review 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acevedo, M.F. 1981. Electrical network simulation of tropical forests successional dynamics. In: Progress in Ecological Engineering and Management by Mathematical Modelling. pp. 883–892. Edited by D.M. Dubois. Editions cebedoc, Liège.Google Scholar
  2. Alemdag, I.S. 1978. Evaluation of some competition indexes for the prediction of diameter increment in planted white spruce. Can. For. Serv., For. Manage. Inst. Inform. Rep. FMR-X-108.Google Scholar
  3. Alig, R.J. 1985. Modeling acreage changes in forest ownerships and cover types in the southeast. USDA For. Serv. Res. Paper RM-260, Rocky Mt. For. & Range Exp. Sta., Fort Collins, Colo.Google Scholar
  4. Alig, R.J. 1986. Econometric analysis of the factors influencing forest acreage trends in the southeast. For. Sci. 32: 119–134.Google Scholar
  5. Alig, R.J. and Wyant, J.G. 1985. Projecting regional area changes in forestland cover in the U.S.A. Ecol. Model. 29: 27–34.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, M.C. 1966. Ecological groupings of plants. Nature 212: 54–56.Google Scholar
  7. Anderson, T.W. and Goodman, L.A. 1957. Statistical inference about Markov chains. Annals Math. Stat. 28: 89–110.Google Scholar
  8. Austin, M.B. 1980. An exploratory analysis of grassland dynamics: An example of a lawn succession. Vegetatio 43: 87–94.Google Scholar
  9. Austin, M.B. and Belbin, L. 1981. An analysis of succession along an environmental gradient using data from a lawn. Vegetatio 46: 19–30.Google Scholar
  10. Baker, W.L., in press. Landscape ecology and nature reserve design in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Minnesota. Ecology, in press.Google Scholar
  11. Barringer, T.H. and Robinson, V.B. 1981. Stochastic models of cover class dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of the Environment. pp. 125–144. Envir. Res. Inst. Mich., Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  12. Bell, E.J. 1974. Markov analysis of land use change. An application of stochastic processes to remotely sensed data. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 8: 311–316.Google Scholar
  13. Bell, E.J. and Hinojosa, R.C. 1977. Markov analysis of land use change: Continuous time and stationary processes. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 11: 13–17.Google Scholar
  14. Bella, I.E. 1971. A new competition model for individual trees. Forest Sci. 17: 364–372.Google Scholar
  15. Bellefleur, P. 1981. Markov models of forest-type secondary succession in coastal British Columbia. Can. J. For. Res. 11: 18–29.Google Scholar
  16. Bertuglia, C.S., Leonardi, G., Occelli, S., Rabino, G.A. and Tadei, R. 1987. An historical review of approaches to urban modelling. In: Urban Systems: Contemporary Approaches to Modelling. pp. 8–76. Edited by C.S. Bertuglia, G. Leonardi, S. Occelli, G.A. Rabino, R. Tadei and A.G. Wilson. Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  17. Bhat, U.N. 1984. Elements of Applied Stochastic Processes. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Binkley, C.S. 1980. Is succession in hardwood forests a stationary Markov process? For. Sci. 26: 566–570.Google Scholar
  19. Botkin, D.B., Janak, J.F. and Wallis, J.R. 1972. Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth. J. Ecol. 60: 849–872.Google Scholar
  20. Botkin, D.B., Reynales, T.E. and Woods, K.D. 1985. Adding spatial considerations to the JABOWA model of forest growth. Machine Proc. Rem. Sens. Data Symposium, 1985: 141–146.Google Scholar
  21. Bourne, L.S. 1971. Physical adjustment processes and land use succession: A conceptual review and central city example. Econ. Geogr. 47: 1–15.Google Scholar
  22. Browder, J.A., Bartley, H.A. and Davis, K.S. 1985. A probabilistic model of the relationship between marshland-water interface and marsh disintegration. Ecol. Model. 29: 245–260.Google Scholar
  23. Brown, L.A. 1970. On the use of Markov chains in movement research. Econ. Geogr. 46: 393–403.Google Scholar
  24. Burgess, R.L. and Sharpe, D.M., eds. 1981. Forest Island Dynamics in Man-Dominated Landscapes. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Burrough, P.A. 1986. Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  26. Byrne, S.V., Wehrle, M.M., Keller, M.A. and Reynolds, J.F. 1987. Impact of gypsy moth infestation on forest succession in the North Carolina piedmont: A simulation study. Ecol. Model. 35: 63–84.Google Scholar
  27. Cattelino, P.J., Noble, I.R., Slatyer, R.O. and Kessell, S.R. 1979. Predicting the multiple pathways of plant succession. Envir. Manage. 3: 41–50.Google Scholar
  28. Collins, L. 1975. An Introduction to Markov Chain Analysis. Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography. Geo Abstracts, Univ. of East Anglia, Norwich.Google Scholar
  29. Collins, L., Drewett, R. and Ferguson, R. 1974. Markov models in geography. The Statistician 23: 179–209.Google Scholar
  30. Conlisk, J. 1976. Interactive Markov chains. J. Math. Soc. 4: 157–185.Google Scholar
  31. Craig, R.G. and Labovitz, M.L. 1980. Sources of variation in LANDSAT autocorrelation. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of the Environment. pp. 1755–1767. Envir. Res. Inst. Mich., Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  32. Cuff, W.H. and Hardman, J.M. 1980. A development of the Leslie matrix formulation for restructuring and extending an ecosystem model: The infestation of stored wheat by Sitophilus oryzae. Ecol. Model. 9: 281–305.Google Scholar
  33. Dale, V.H. and Gardner, R.H. 1987. Assessing regional impacts of growth declines using a forest succession model. J. Envir. Manage. 24: 83–93.Google Scholar
  34. DeAngelis, D.L. and Mattice, J.S. 1979. Implications of a partial differential equation cohort model. Math. Biosci. 47: 271–285.Google Scholar
  35. DeAngelis, D.L. and Waterhouse, J.C. 1987. Equilibrium and nonequilibrium concepts in ecological models. Ecol. Monogr. 57: 1–21.Google Scholar
  36. DeAngelis, D.L., Waterhouse, J.C., Post, W.M. and O'Neill, R.V. 1985. Ecological modelling and disturbance evaluation. Ecol. Model. 29: 399–419.Google Scholar
  37. Debussche, M., Godron, M., Lepart, J. and Romane, F. 1977. An account of the use of a transition matrix. Agro-Ecosystems 3: 81–92.Google Scholar
  38. Deutsch, S.J. and Ramos, J.A. 1986. Space-time modeling of vector hydrologic sequences. Water Resources Bull. 22: 967–981.Google Scholar
  39. Diamond, J. 1986. Overview: Laboratory experiments, field experiments, and natural experiments. In: Community Ecology. pp. 3–22. Edited by J. Diamond and T.J. Case. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Dodson, J.R., Greenwood, P.W. and Jones, R.L. 1986. Holocene forest and wetland vegetation dynamics at Barrington Tops, New South Wales. J. Biogeogr. 13: 561–585.Google Scholar
  41. Doubleday, W.G. 1975. Harvesting in matrix population models. Biometrics 31: 189–200.Google Scholar
  42. Drewett, J.R. 1969. A stochastic model of the land conversion process. Regional Studies 3: 269–280.Google Scholar
  43. Edelstein-Keshet, L. 1988. Mathematical Models in Biology. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Ek, A.R. 1974. Nonlinear models for stand table projection in northern hardwood stands. Can. J. For. Res. 4: 23–27.Google Scholar
  45. Emanuel, W.R., Shugart, H.H. and Stevenson, M.P. 1985. Climatic change and the broad-scale distribution of terrestrial ecosystem complexes. Climatic Change 7: 29–43.Google Scholar
  46. Eston, V.R., Galves, A., Jacobi, C.M., Langevin, R. and Tanaka, N.I. 1986. Chthamalus bisinuatus (Cirripedia) and Brachidontes solisianus (Bivalvia) spatial interactions: A stochastic model. Ecol. Model. 34: 99–113.Google Scholar
  47. Fahrig, L., Lefkovitch, L.P. and Merriam, H.G. 1983. Population stability in a patchy environment. In: Analysis of Ecological Systems: State-of-the-Art in Ecological Modelling. pp. 61–67. Edited by W.K. Lauenroth, G.V. Skogerboe and M. Flug. Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Fahrig, L. and Merriam, G. 1985. Habitat patch connectivity and population survival. Ecology 66: 1762–1768.Google Scholar
  49. Feller, W. 1968. An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications. Vol. 1. 3rd Ed. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Finn, J.T. 1985. Analysis of land use change statistics through the use of Markov chains. In: Proceedings of the 1985 Summer Computer Simulation Conference. pp. 514–519. The Society for Computer Simulation.Google Scholar
  51. Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  52. Franklin, J.F. and Forman, R.T.T. 1987. Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: Ecological consequences and principles. Landscape Ecology 1: 5–18.Google Scholar
  53. Freedman, H.I. 1980. Deterministic Mathematical Models in Population Biology. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Gardner, R.H., Milne, B.T., Turner, M.G. and O'Neill, R.V. 1987. Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1: 19–28.Google Scholar
  55. Gibson, C.W.D., Guilford, T.C., Hambler, C. and Sterling, P.H. 1983. Transition matrix models and succession after release from grazing on Aldabra atoll. Vegetatio 52: 151–159.Google Scholar
  56. Gilbert, G. 1972. Two Markov models of neighborhood housing turnover. Envir. and Planning A 4: 133–146.Google Scholar
  57. Ginsberg, R.B. 1971. Semi-Markov processes and mobility. J. Math. Soc. 1: 233–262.Google Scholar
  58. Ginsberg, R.B. 1972a. Critique of probabilistic models: Application of the semi-Markov model to migration. J. Math. Soc. 2: 63–82.Google Scholar
  59. Ginsberg, R.B. 1972b. Incorporating causal structure and exogenous information with probabilistic models: With special reference to gravity, migration, and Markov chains. J. Math. Soc. 2: 83–103.Google Scholar
  60. Ginsberg, R.B. 1973. Stochastic models of residential and geographic mobility for heterogenous populations. Envir. and Planning A 5: 113–124.Google Scholar
  61. Godron, M. and Lepart, J. 1973. Sur la representation de la dynamique de la vegetation au moyen de matrices de succession. In: Sukzessionsforschung. pp. 269–287. Edited by W. Schmidt. J. Cramer, Vaduz.Google Scholar
  62. Green, R.H. 1979. Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  63. Gurtin, M.E. and MacCamy, R.C. 1979. Some simple models for nonlinear age-dependent population dynamics. Math. Biosci. 43: 199–211.Google Scholar
  64. Gyllenberg, M. 1984. An age-dependent population model with applications to microbial growth processes. In: Modelling of Patterns in Space and Time. pp. 87–102. Edited by W. Jager and J.D. Murray. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  65. Hahn, J.T. and Leary, R.A. 1974. Test of a model of forest succession. For. Sci. 20: 212.Google Scholar
  66. Hall, F.G., Strebel, D.E., Goetz, S.J., Woods, K.D. and Botkin, D.B. 1987. Landscape pattern and successional dynamics in the boreal forest. Proc. IGARSS '87 Symp. (Ann Arbor, Mich.-18–21 May 1987) pp. 473–482.Google Scholar
  67. Harary, F., Lipstein, B. and Styan, G.P.H. 1970. A matrix approach to nonstationary chains. Operations Res. 18: 1168–1181.Google Scholar
  68. Harris, L.D. 1984. The Fragmented Forest. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  69. Hastings, A. 1980. Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space. Theor. Pop. Biol. 18: 363–373.Google Scholar
  70. Henderson, W. and Wilkins, C.W. 1975. The interaction of bushfires and vegetation. Search 6(4): 130–133.Google Scholar
  71. Hirabayashi, F. and Kasahara, Y. 1987. A fire-spread simulation model developed as an extension of a dynamic percolation process model. Simulation 49: 254–261.Google Scholar
  72. Hobbs, R.J. 1983. Markov models in the study of post-fire succession in heathland communities. Vegetatio 56: 17–30.Google Scholar
  73. Hobbs, R.J. and Hobbs, V.J. 1987. Gophers and grassland: A model of vegetation response to patchy soil disturbance. Vegetatio 69: 141–146.Google Scholar
  74. Horn, H.S. 1975. Markovian processes of forest succession. In: Ecology and Evolution of Communities. pp. 196–211. Edited by M.L. Cody and J.M. Diamond. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  75. Horn, H.S. and MacArthur, R.H. 1972. Competition among fugitive species in a harlequin environment. Ecology 53: 749–752.Google Scholar
  76. Hubbard, K.G. 1980. Relating fire occurrence to weather conditions on the Great Basin rangelands. J. Range Manage. 33: 360–362.Google Scholar
  77. Hulst, R. van 1979. On the dynamics of vegetation: Markov chains as models of succession. Vegetatio 40: 3–14.Google Scholar
  78. Iversen, L.R. and Risser, P.G. 1987. Analyzing long-term changes in vegetation with geographic information system and remotely sensed data. Adv. Space Res. 7: 183–194.Google Scholar
  79. Jahan, S. 1986. The determination of stability and similarity of Markovian land use change processes. A theoretical and empirical analysis. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 20: 243–251.Google Scholar
  80. Jenkins, K.J. and Wright, R.J. 1987. Simulating succession of riparian spruce forests and white-tailed deer carrying capacity in northwestern Montana. West. J. Appl. For. 2: 80–83.Google Scholar
  81. Johnson, E.W. 1973. Relationship between point density measurements and subsequent growth of southern pines. Auburn Univ. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 447.Google Scholar
  82. Johnson, W.C. 1977. A mathematical model of forest succession and land use for the North Carolina piedmont. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club 104: 334–346.Google Scholar
  83. Johnson, W.C. and Sharpe, D.M. 1976. An analysis of forest dynamics in the northern Georgia piedmont. For. Sci. 22: 307–322.Google Scholar
  84. Kachi, N., Yasuoka, Y., Totsuka, T. and Suzuki, S. 1986. A stochastic model for describing revegetation following forest cutting: An application of remote sensing. Ecol. Model. 32: 105–117.Google Scholar
  85. Karlson, R.H. 1981. A simulation study of growth inhibition and predator resistance in Hydractinia echinata. Ecol. Model. 13: 29–47.Google Scholar
  86. Kemeny, J.G. and Snell, J.L. 1960. Finite Markov Chains. D. Van Nostrand, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  87. Kessell, S.R. 1976. Gradient modeling: A new approach to fire modeling and wilderness resource management. Envir. Manage. 1: 39–48.Google Scholar
  88. Kessell, S.R. 1977. Gradient modeling: A new approach to fire modeling and resource management. In: Ecosystem Modeling in Theory and Practice: An Introduction with Case Histories. pp. 575–605. Edited by C.A.S. Hall and J.W. Day, Jr. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  89. Kessell, S.R. 1979a. Gradient Modeling: Resource and Fire Management. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  90. Kessell, S.R. 1979b. Phytosociological inference and resource management. Envir. Manage. 3: 29–40.Google Scholar
  91. Kessell, S.R. and Cattelino, P.J. 1978. Evaluation of a fire behavior information integration system for southern California chaparral wildlands. Envir. Manage. 2: 135–159.Google Scholar
  92. Kessell, S.R. and Good, R.B. 1982. PREPLAN (Pristine Environment Planning Language and Simulator) user's guide for Kosciusko National Park. National Parks and Wildlife Service of New South Wales Spec. Publ., Sydney.Google Scholar
  93. Kessell, S.R., Good, R.B. and Hopkins, A.J.M. 1984. Implementation of two new resource management information systems in Australia. Envir. Manage. 8: 251–270.Google Scholar
  94. Lefkovitch, L.P. 1965. The study of population growth in organisms grouped by stages. Biometrics 21: 1–18.Google Scholar
  95. Lefkovitch, L.P. and Fahrig, L. 1985. Spatial characteristics of habitat patches and population survival. Ecol. Model. 30: 297–308.Google Scholar
  96. Leslie, P.H. 1945. On the use of matrices in population mathematics. Biometrika 35: 213–245.Google Scholar
  97. Leslie, P.H. 1959. The properties of a certain lag type of population growth and the influence of an external random factor on a number of such populations. Physiol. Zool. 32: 151–159.Google Scholar
  98. Levin, S.A. 1974. Dispersion and population interactions. Am. Natur. 108: 207–228.Google Scholar
  99. Levin, S.A. 1976. Population dynamic models in heterogenous environments. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7: 287–310.Google Scholar
  100. Levin, S.A. and Paine, R.T. 1974. Disturbance, patch formation, and community structure. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 71: 2744–2747.Google Scholar
  101. Lillesand, T.M. and Kiefer, R.W. 1979. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  102. Lippe, E., DeSmidt, J.T. and Glenn-Lewin, D.C. 1985. Markov models and succession: A test from a heathland in the Netherlands. J. Ecol. 73: 775–791.Google Scholar
  103. Long, J.F. and McMillen, D.B. 1987. A survey of Census Bureau population projection methods. Climatic Change 11: 141–177.Google Scholar
  104. Loucks, O.L., Ek, A.R., Johnson, W.C. and Monserud, R.A. 1981. Growth, aging and succession. In: Dynamic Properties of Forest Ecosystems. pp. 37–85. Edited by D.E. Reichle. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  105. Lough, T.J., Wilson, J.B., Mark, A.F. and Evans, A.C. 1987. Succession in a New Zealand alpine cushion community: A Markovian model. Vegetatio 71: 129–138.Google Scholar
  106. Lowry, I.S. 1964. A Model of Metropolis. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California.Google Scholar
  107. Lynch, T.B. and Moser, J.W., Jr. 1986. A growth model for mixed species stands. For. Sci. 32: 697–706.Google Scholar
  108. Mackey, H.E., Jr. and Sivec, N. 1959. The present composition of a former oak-chestnut forest in the Allegheny Mountains of western Pennsylvania. Ecology 54: 915–918.Google Scholar
  109. Maguire, L.A. and Porter, J.W. 1977. A spatial model of growth and competition strategies in coral communities. Ecol. Model. 3: 249–271.Google Scholar
  110. Marsden, M.A. 1983. Modeling the effect of wildfire frequency on forest structure and succession in the northern Rocky Mountains. J. Envir. Manage. 16: 45–62.Google Scholar
  111. Massy, W.F., Montgomery, D.B. and Morrison, D.G. 1970. Stochastic Models of Buying Behavior. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  112. McGinnis, R. 1968. A stochastic model of social mobility. Am. Soc. Rev. 33: 712–722.Google Scholar
  113. McKendrick, A.C. 1926. Applications of mathematics to medical problems. Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 44: 98–130.Google Scholar
  114. Meentemeyer, V. and Box, E.O. 1987. Scale effects in landscape studies. In: Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance. pp. 15–34. Edited by M.G. Turner. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  115. Menges, E.S. and Loucks, O.L. 1984. Modeling a diseasecaused patch disturbance: Oak wild in the midwestern United States. Ecology 65: 487–498.Google Scholar
  116. Mintz, Y. 1984. The sensitivity of numerically simulated climates to land-surface boundary conditions. In: The Global Climate. pp. 79–105. Edited by J.T. Houghton. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  117. Mueller-Dombois, D. 1987. Natural dieback in forests. BioScience 37: 575–583.Google Scholar
  118. Naveh, Z. and Lieberman, A.S. 1984. Landscape Ecology. Theory and Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  119. Nisbet, R.M. and Gurney, W.S.C. 1982. Modelling Fluctuating Populations. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, U.K.Google Scholar
  120. Noordwijk-Puijk, K. van, Beeftink, W.G. and Hogeweg, P. 1979. Vegetation development on salt-marsh flats after disappearance of the tidal factor. Vegetatio 39: 1–13.Google Scholar
  121. Oster, G. and Takahashi, Y. 1974. Models for age-specific interactions in a periodic environment. Ecol. Monogr. 44: 483–501.Google Scholar
  122. Pacala, S.W. and Silander, J.A., Jr. 1985. Neighborhood models of plant population dynamics. I. Single-species models of annuals. Am. Natur. 125: 385–411.Google Scholar
  123. Paine, R.T. and Levin, S.A. 1981. Intertidal landscapes: Disturbance and the dynamics of pattern. Ecol. Monogr. 51: 145–178.Google Scholar
  124. Pearlstine, L., McKellar, M. and Kitchens, W. 1985. Modelling the impacts of a river diversion on bottomland forest communities in the Santee River floodplain, South Carolina. Ecol. Model. 29: 283–302.Google Scholar
  125. Pennycuick, C.J., Compton, R.M. and Beckingham, L. 1968. A computer model for simulating the growth of a population, or of two interacting populations. J. Theoret. Biol. 18: 316–329.Google Scholar
  126. Pfeifer, P.E. and Deutsch, S.J. 1980. A STARIMA model-building procedure with application to description and regional forecasting. Inst. Brit. Geogr. Trans., n.s. 5: 330–349.Google Scholar
  127. Pickett, S.T.A. and White, P.S., eds. 1985. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  128. Pickles, A. 1980. Models of movement: A review of alternative methods. Envir. and Planning A 12: 1383–1404.Google Scholar
  129. Potter, M.W. and Kessell, S.R. 1980. Predicting mosaics and wildlife diversity resulting from fire disturbance to a forest ecosystem. Envir. Manage. 4: 247–254.Google Scholar
  130. Potter, M.W., Kessell, S.R. and Cattelino, P.J. 1979. FOR-PLAN: A FORest Planning LANguage simulator. Envir. Manage. 3: 59–72.Google Scholar
  131. Price, M. 1986. The analysis of vegetation change by remote sensing. Prog. Physical Geogr. 10: 473–491.Google Scholar
  132. Rees, P. 1986. Developments in the modeling of spatial populations. In: Population Structures and Models. pp. 97–125. Edited by R. Woods and P. Rees. Allen & Unwin, Boston.Google Scholar
  133. Rees, P. and Wilson, A.G. 1977. Spatial Population Analysis. Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  134. Rejmanek, M., Sasser, C.E. and Gosselink, J.G. 1987. Modeling of vegetation dynamics in the Mississippi River deltaic plain. Vegetatio 69: 133–140.Google Scholar
  135. Risser, P.G. 1987. Landscape ecology: State of the art. In: Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance. pp. 3–14. Edited by M.G. Turner. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  136. Risser, P.G., Karr, J.R. and Forman, R.T.T. 1984. Landscape Ecology: Directions and Approaches. Illinois Natural History Survey Special Publ. 2, Champaign, Illinois.Google Scholar
  137. Roberts, M.R. and Hruska, A.J. 1986. Predicting diameter distributions: A test of the stationary Markov model. Can. J. For. Res. 16: 130–135.Google Scholar
  138. Robinson, V.B. 1978. Information theory and sequences of land use: An application. Prof. Geogr. 30: 174–179.Google Scholar
  139. Rogers, A. 1975. Introduction to Multiregional Mathematical Demography. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  140. Rogers, A. 1985. Regional Population Projection Models. Sage, Beverly Hills.Google Scholar
  141. Rothermel, R.C. 1972. A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA For. Serv. Res. Paper INT-137, Intermt. Res. Sta., Ogden, Utah.Google Scholar
  142. Sellers, P.J., Mintz, Y., Sud, Y.C. and Dalcher, A. 1986. A simple biosphere model (SiB) for use with general circulation models. J. Atmos. Sci. 43: 505–531.Google Scholar
  143. Sharpe, D.M., Stearns, F.W., Burgess, R.L. and Johnson, W.C. 1981. Spatio-temporal patterns of forest ecosystems in man-dominated landscapes. In: Perspectives in Landscape Ecology: Contributions to Research, Planning and Management of Our Environment. pp. 109–116. Edited by S.P. Tjallingii and A.D. de Veer. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  144. Shugart, H.H. 1984. A Theory of Forest Dynamics. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  145. Shugart, H.H., Jr., Crow, T.R. and Hett, J.M. 1973. Forest succession models: A rationale and methodology for modeling forest succession over large regions. For. Sci. 19: 203–212.Google Scholar
  146. Shugart, H.H., Jr., Crow, T.R. and Hett, J.M. 1974. Reply to Jerold T. Hahn and Rolfe A. Leary on forest succession models. For. Sci. 20: 213.Google Scholar
  147. Shugart, H.H., Jr. and Noble, I.R. 1981. A computer model of succession and fire response of the high-altitude Eucalyptus forest of the Brindabella Range, Australian Capital Territory. Austr. J. Ecol. 6: 149–164.Google Scholar
  148. Shugart, H.H., Jr. and Seagle, S.W. 1985. Modeling forest landscapes and the role of disturbance in ecosystems and communities. In: The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. pp. 353–368. Edited by S.T.A. Pickett and P.S. White. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  149. Shugart, H.H., Jr. and West, D.C. 1977. Development of an Appalachian deciduous forest succession model and its application to assessment of the impact of the chestnut blight. J. Envir. Manage. 5: 161–179.Google Scholar
  150. Shugart, H.H., Jr. and West, D.C. 1980. Forest succession models. BioScience 30: 308–313.Google Scholar
  151. Simmons, A.J. and Bengtsson, L. 1984. Atmospheric general circulation models: their design and use for climate studies. In: The Global Climate. pp. 37–62. Edited by J.T. Houghton. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  152. Sinko, J.W. and Streifer, W. 1967. A new model for age-size structure of a population. Ecology 48: 910–918.Google Scholar
  153. Sinko, J.W. and Streifer, W. 1969. Applying models incorporating age-size structure to Daphnia. Ecology 50: 608–615.Google Scholar
  154. Sklar, F.H. and Costanza, R. 1986. A spatial simulation of ecosystem succession in a Louisiana coastal landscape. In: Proceedings of the 1986 Summer Computer Simulation Conference. pp. 467–472. Edited by R. Crosbie and P. Luker. Society for Computer Simulation.Google Scholar
  155. Sklar, F.H., Costanza, R. and Day, J.W., Jr. 1985. Dynamic spatial simulation modeling of coastal wetland habitat succession. Ecol. Model. 29: 261–281.Google Scholar
  156. Slatkin, M. 1974. Competition and regional coexistence. Ecology 55: 128–134.Google Scholar
  157. Slobodkin, L.B. 1953. An algebra of population growth. Ecology 34: 513–519.Google Scholar
  158. Smith, O.L. 1980. The influence of environmental gradients on ecosystem stability. Am. Natur. 116: 1–24.Google Scholar
  159. Solbrig, O.T., Sarandon, R. and Bossert, W. 1988. A density-dependent growth model of a perennial herb, Viola fimbriatula. Am. Natur. 131: 385–400.Google Scholar
  160. Spilerman, S. 1972. The analysis of mobility processes by the introduction of independent variables into a Markov chain. Am. Soc. Rev. 37: 277–294.Google Scholar
  161. Stauffer, D. 1985. Introduction to Percolation Theory. Taylor and Francis, London.Google Scholar
  162. Stephens, G.R. and Waggoner, P.E. 1970. The forest anticipated from 40 years of natural transitions in mixed hardwoods. Conn. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 707.Google Scholar
  163. Streifer, W. 1974. Realistic models in population ecology. Adv. Ecol. Res. 8: 199–266.Google Scholar
  164. Thomas, G. and Henderson-Sellers, A. 1987. Evaluation of satellite derived land cover characteristics for global climate modelling. Clim. Change 11: 313–347.Google Scholar
  165. Tongeren, O. van and Prentice, I.C. 1986. A spatial simulation model for vegetation dynamics. Vegetatio 65: 163–173.Google Scholar
  166. Turnbull, K.J. 1963. Population dynamics in mixed forest stands. A system of mathematical models of mixed stand growth and structure. PhD. Diss., Univ. of Wash., Seattle.Google Scholar
  167. Turner, M.G. 1987. Spatial simulation of landscape changes in Georgia: A comparison of 3 transition models. Landscape Ecology 1: 29–36.Google Scholar
  168. Turner, M.G., in press. A spatial simulation model of land use changes in a piedmont county in Georgia. Appl. Math. Comp.Google Scholar
  169. Turner, M.G., Gardner, R.H., Dale, V.H. and O'Neill, R.V. 1988. Landscape pattern and the spread of disturbance. Proc. VIIIth Intern. Symp. Problems of Landscape Ecol. Res. (Oct. 3–7, 1988).Google Scholar
  170. Usher, M.B. 1966. A matrix approach to the management of renewable resources, with special reference to selection forests. J. Appl. Ecol. 3: 355–367.Google Scholar
  171. Usher, M.B. 1972. Developments in the Leslie matrix model. In: Mathematical Models in Ecology. pp. 29–60. Edited by J.N.R. Jeffers. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  172. Usher, M.B. 1981. Modeling ecological succession, with particular reference to Markovian models. Vegetatio 46: 11–18.Google Scholar
  173. Usher, M.B. and Parr, T.W. 1977. Are there successional changes in arthropod decomposer communities? J. Envir. Manage. 5: 151–160.Google Scholar
  174. Usher, M.B. and Williamson, M.H. 1970. A deterministic matrix model for handling the birth, death, and migration processes of spatially distributed populations. Biometrics 26: 1–12.Google Scholar
  175. Vale, T.R. 1982. Plants and People: Vegetation Change in North America. Resource Publications in Geography, Association of American Geographers, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  176. Vandermeer, J. 1978. Choosing category size in a stage projection matrix. Oecologia 32: 79–84.Google Scholar
  177. Von Foerster, H. 1959. Some remarks on changing populations. In: The Kinetics of Cellular Proliferation. pp. 382–407. Edited by F. Stohlman Jr. Grune and Stratton, New York.Google Scholar
  178. Weiner, J. and Conte, P.T. 1981. Dispersal and neighborhood effects in an annual plant competition model. Ecol. Model. 13: 131–147.Google Scholar
  179. Weinstein, D.A. and Shugart, H.H. 1983. Ecological modeling of landscape dynamics. In: Disturbance and Ecosystems: Components of Response. pp. 29–45. Edited by H.A. Mooney and M. Godron. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  180. Wilkie, D.S. and Finn, J.T. 1988. A spatial model of land use and forest regeneration in the Ituri forest of northeastern Zaire. Ecol. Model. 41: 307–323.Google Scholar
  181. Wilkins, C.W. 1977. A stochastic analysis of the effect of fire on remote vegetation. PhD Diss., Univ. of Adelaide, South Australia.Google Scholar
  182. Williams, W.T., Lance, G.N., Webb, L.J., Tracey, J.G. and Dale, M.B. 1969. Studies in the numerical analysis of complex rainforest communities. III. The analysis of successional data. J. Ecol. 57: 515–536.Google Scholar
  183. Wilson, A.G. 1974. Urban and Regional Models in Geography and Planning. Wiley, Chichester, U.K.Google Scholar
  184. Wilson, A.G. 1987. Transport, location and spatial systems: Planning with spatial interaction models. In: Urban Systems: Contemporary Approaches to Modelling. pp. 337–426. Edited by C.S. Bertuglia, G. Leonardi, S. Occelli, G.A. Rabino, R. Tadei and A.G. Wilson. Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  185. Wilson, M.F., Henderson-Sellers, A., Dickinson, R.E. and Kennedy, P.J. 1987. Sensitivity of the biosphere-atmosphere transfer scheme (BATS) to the inclusion of variable soil characteristics. J. Clim. Appl. Meteor. 26: 341–362.Google Scholar
  186. Woods, R. and Rees, P., eds. 1986. Population Structures and Models. Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  187. Woolhouse, M.E.J. and Harmsen, R. 1987. A transition matrix model of seasonal changes in mite populations. Ecol. Model. 37: 167–189.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© SPB Academic Publishing bv 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • William L. Baker
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations