Skip to main content
Log in

The leadership challenge in universities: The case of business schools

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Qualitative research based on in-depth interviews with seventeen deans of schools of business in US and European universities reveals that morale is higher than has been suggested despite great pressures on the deans' leadership and management abilities. The deans report spending an average of forty-five percent of their time working with external constituents and suffering from excessive workloads. They regard themselves as less powerful than leaders in business whilst being equally accountable financially. They see themselves as facilitators for their colleagues. Whilst acknowledging mistakes and the major scale of challenges ahead, most report a high degree of commitment and enthusiasm. There was no evidence of national cultural differences in organisation or attitudes. None of the deans experienced formal training and development to prepare them for their role. The study may provide some pointers to the possible content and appropriate means of delivering such provision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A Business Week Guide: ‘The Best Business Schools’ (1993), Third edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Alutto, J.A. (1991). ‘Issues Affecting Business Schools: A Dean's Perspective’, Selections, Autumn, Santa Monica, Graduate Management Admissions Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. (1989a). On Becoming a Leader. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. (1989b). Why Leaders can't Lead: The Unconscious Conspiracy Continues. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis W. and Nanus B. (1985). Leaders: the Strategies for Taking Charge. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon, E.M. (1989). ‘The Meaning of ‘Good Presidential Leadership’: A Frame Analysis’, Review of Higher Education 12 (2), 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon, E.M. (1991). ‘The Social Processes through which Faculty Shape the Image of a New President’, Journal of Higher Education 62 (6), 637–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon E.M. (1993). ‘New Presidents' Initial Actions: Transactional and Transformational Leadership’, Journal for Higher Education Management 8 (2), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (1986). ‘Leadership and Learning: The College President as Intuitive Scientist’, Review of Higher Education 9 (4), 381–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (1988). How Colleges Work: the Cybernetics of Academic Organization and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (1992). ‘Will You Love Me in December as You Do in May? Why Experienced College Presidents Lose Faculty Support’, Journal of Higher Education 63 (1), January/February, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H., Calori, R., and WooT, P. de (1994). Euro Management: A New Style for the Global Market. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, R. (1991). ‘The Management and Evaluation of the Entrepreneurial University: The Case of England’, Higher Education Policy 4 (3), 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortune (1994). ‘What is Killing the Business School Deans of America?’ 130 (3), August 8.

  • Gray, H.L. (1989). ‘Resisting Change: Some Organisational Considerations about University Departments’, Educational Management and Administration 17, 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey-Jones, J. (1988). Making it Happen: Reflections on Leadership. London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefell, L. G., Robinson, J F., Harshberger, R. F., Krallman, J. D., and Frary, R. B. (1991). ‘Assessing the leadership culture at Virginia Tech’, in Sherr, L.A. and Teeter, D. J. (eds), Total Quality Management in Higher Education, New Directions for Institutional Research 71, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorange, P. (1988). ‘Stimulating Strategic Direction Setting in Professional Groups: The Case of an Academic Department’, Advances in Strategic Management 5, 299–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R. (1989). ‘Leadership and Higher Education’, Higher Education 18, 353–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R. (1993). Leading Academics. Milton Keynes: SRHE/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, A. (1989). ‘Strategic Leadership: The Changing Orientations of College Presidents’, Review of Higher Education 12 (2), 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, A. (1990). ‘Making Mistakes: Error and Learning in the College Presidency’, Journal of Higher Education 61, 386–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, A. and Bensimon, E.M. (1990). ‘Constructing the Presidency: College Presidents'Image of their Leadership Roles: A Comparative Study’, Journal of Higher Education 61 (6), November/December, 678–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Keefe, D. (1991). ‘Women and Leadership in American Universities’, McGill Journal of Education 26 (3), 303–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wholihan, J.T. (1990). ‘Business Dean Turnover: Causes and Consequences’, Selections, Autumn, Santa Monica, Graduate Management Admissions Council.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bolton, A. The leadership challenge in universities: The case of business schools. High Educ 31, 491–506 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137128

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137128

Keywords

Navigation