Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The social policy of the firm

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The “welfare state” concept hides an important aspect of modern industrial societies. In capitalist countries welfare is provided through a mixture of public and private initiatives. The author suggests that the concept “welfare economy” more fully captures the economic interpenetration of public and private sectors. The growth of fringe benefits illustrates the extent to which private enterprise performs the welfare function.

Government increasingly intervenes through processes of mandating, stimulating, regulating, and supporting, using private enterprise as the vehicle for delivery of welfare services. Government's traditionally conceived role as welfare service provider is also changed through recognition that it is both an employer and purchaser, significantly impacting society's original income distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cazes, B. (1979). “The Crisis of the Welfare State in the Western Economies,” a paper prepared for a conference in Mexico City supported by the Fondacion de Sciences Humaines, August, 1979.

  • Klein, R. (1978). “Public Expenditures in an Inflationary World,” a paper prepared for the Brookings project on the politics and sociology of global inflation, November, 1978, pp. 5 and 6.

  • Reid, G. L. (1961). “The concept of fringe benefits,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 9: 208–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, G. L. and Robertson, D.J. (1965). Fringe Benefits, Labor Costs and Social Security. London: Allen & Unwin, Ltd., p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on the Distribution of Income and Wealth (1979). Report Number 8, Fifth Report on the Standing Reference, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultze, C. L. (1977). The Public Use of the Private Interest, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institute, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, M. (1976). “Twenty-five years of employee benefit plans,” Social Security Bulletin, September, p. 4.

  • Smeeding, T. (1981). “The size distribution of wage and non-wage compensation: employer cost vs. employee value,” a paper prepared for the NBER Conference on Research in Income and Wealth, December, 1981.

  • Thurow, C. (1981). “Equity, Efficiency, Social Justice and Redistribution,” a paper prepared for the OECD Conference on Social Policy in the 1980s, Paris.

  • Titmuss, R. M. (1958). “The social division of welfare,” in Essays in the Welfare State, London: Allen & Unwin, Ltd., Chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom, London: Pelican Books, p. 223.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An earlier version of this essay was presented as a lecture at the University of Melbourne and published in Ronald F. Henderson, The Welfare Stakes: Strategies for Australian Social Policy, Melbourne: Institute of Applied Economics and Social Research, 1981.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rein, M. The social policy of the firm. Policy Sci 14, 117–135 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137113

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137113

Keywords

Navigation