Skip to main content
Log in

Financing higher education in Pakistan

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A recent shift in the allocation of public expenditure towards higher education prompts several questions: Is this allocation economically justified? Are these resources well utilized? Is there significant cost recovery of these expenditures? If not, who benefits from the subsidy these expenditures represent? Are there alternative means of financing higher education? This paper attempts to provide answers to these questions, which can be briefly summarized as follows: Estimates of social rates of returns do not support the reallocation of public expenditures away from primary towards higher education; low retention rates and high failure rates suggest that the internal efficiency in the utilization of these expenditures is low; currently, almost all public expenditures on higher education represent a subsidy; given the tax burden and enrollment ratios by income group, the lower income groups seem to be gaining most from these subsidies; a start has been made at private sector higher education with the opening of two professional universities, but the prospects of general universities currently opening appears to be dim. Pakistan has a well designed loan program in operation although its quantitative impact is currently limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Federal Bureau of Statistics (nd). Household Income and Expenditure Survey 1984–85. Karachi: Statistics Division.

  • Federal Bureau of Statistics (1983). Household Income and Expenditure Survey 1979. Karachi: Statistics Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Statistics. Labour Force Survey, 1982–83, 1984–85, 1985–86, 1986–87. Karachi: Statistics Division.

  • Fields, G. S. (1975). ‘Higher education and income distribution in a less developed country’, Oxford Economic Papers 27 (2), 245–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finance Division (1988). Economic Survey 1987–88. Islamabad: Economic Advisor's Wing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finance Division (1990). Economic Survey 1989–90. Islamabad: Economic Advisor's Wing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamdani, K. A. (1977). ‘Education and the income differential: an estimation for Rawalpindi City’, Pakistan Development Review 16 (2).

  • Hanson, W. L. and Weisbrod, B. A. (1969). ‘The distribution of costs and direct benefits of public higher education: the case of California’, Journal of Human Resources 4 (2).

  • Jallade, J. (1974). Public Expenditure on Education and Income. Distribution in Columbia. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, E. and Tan, Jee-Peng (1985). Educational Development in Pakistan: The Role of User Charges and Private Education. Washington, D. C.: The World Bank Education and Training Department, Report No. EDT16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S. R. (forthcoming). ‘The income redistributional impact of financing higher education in Pakistan’, World Development.

  • Khan, S. R. (1987). ‘The Pakistani experiment with Islamic (profit-and-loss sharing) banking’, Bangladesh Development Studies XV (4).

  • Khan, S. R. and Ali, S. Z. (1988). ‘Some findings on higher educated unemployment in Pakistan’, Canadian Journal of Development Studies IX (2).

  • Malik, M. H. and Saqib, N. (1989). ‘Tax incidence by income classes in Pakistan’, Pakistan Development Review 28 (1).

  • Planning Commission (1983). The Sixth Five Year Plan (1983–88). Islamabad.

  • Planning Commission (1988). The Seventh Five Year Plan (1988–93). Draft report, Islamabad.

  • Psacharopoulos, G. (1977). ‘The perverse effects of public subsidization of education’, Comparative Education Review 21 (1).

  • Psacharopoulos, G. and Woodhall, M. (1985). Education for Development: An Analysis of Investment Choices. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal, B. C. et al. (1987). Higher Education and Employment Opportunities in Pakistan. International Institute of Educational Planning Research Report No. 60.

  • Selowsky, M. (1979). Who Benefits from Government Expenditure? A Case Study of Columbia. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sher, Akbar (1987). ‘Unemployment among engineers and measures for their gainful employment’, unpublished paper for national seminar on educated unemployment jointly organized by Friedrich Eben Stiftung and Government of Pakistan, Ministry of Labour, Manpower and Overseas Pakistanis.

  • UNESCO (1989). UNESCO Statistical Yearbook. Paris.

  • University Grants Commission (nd). 1987 Statistics on Higher Education in Pakistan. Islamabad.

  • Woodhall, M. (1988). ‘Designing a student loan programme for a developing country: the relevance of international experience’, Economics of Education Review 1, 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khan, S.R. Financing higher education in Pakistan. High Educ 21, 207–222 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137074

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137074

Keywords

Navigation