Abstract
In the tradition of open systems/sociotechnical systems theory, this case study research compared data gathered from three Chinese higher education institutions and from an international panel of experts on strategic planning. Conceptual and measurement distinctions were made between capability and capacity, and between current and realizable practice. Planning capability refers to human factors such as commitment, participation, coordination, and technology such as knowledge, equipment, and techniques necessary to conduct successful planning. Planning capacity is concerned with the openness of the system and its range of options, the authority or freedom at the institutional level to make decisions and to implement long-term planned changes, and the degree requirements and guidelines from outside the institution which influence its decision-making process. While analysis was attempted for both Chinese and Western institutions, more attention was directed to the Chinese setting.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bertalanffy, L. V. (1950). ‘The theory of open systems in physics and biology’, Science 111, 23–29.
Caruthers, J. K. and Lott, G.B. (1981). Mission Review: Foundation for Strategic Planning. Colo: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
Clark, B. R. (1983). The Higher Education System. London: University of California Press, Ltd.
Cope, R. G. (1978). Strategic Policy Planning: A Guide for College and University Administrators. Littleton: The Ireland Educational Corporation.
Cope, R. G. (1981). Strategic Planning, Management, and Decision Making. Washington D. C: American Association for Higher Education.
Kast, F. E. and Rosenzweig, J. E. (1976). Organization and Management: A Systems and Contingency Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Keller, G. (1983). Academic Strategy. London: The Johns Hopkins Press Ltd.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper and Row.
McCorkle, C. O. Jr. and Archibald, S. O. (1982). Management and Leadership in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Moore, J. W. and Langknecht, L. F. (1986). ‘Academic planning in a political system’, Planning for Higher Education 14 (1), 1–5.
Palola, E. G., Lehmann, T., and Blischke, W. R. (1971). ‘The reluctant planner: faculty in institutional planning’, Journal of Higher Education 42, 587–602.
Pasmore, W. A. and Sherwood, J. J. (1978). ‘Organizations as sociotechnical systems’, in Pasmore, W. A. (ed.), Sociotechical Systems: A Sourcebook. La Jolla: University Associates, Inc, pp. 3–7.
Peterson, M. W. (1980). ‘Analyzing alternative approaches to plannign’, in Jedamus, P. and Peterson, M. W. (eds.), Improving Academic Management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., pp. 113–163.
Rosen, S. (1985). ‘The People's Republic of China’, in Clark, B. R. (ed.), The School and the University. London: University of California Press, Ltd., pp. 160–194.
Scott, C. L. (1986). ‘Launching successful planning efforts’, Planning for Higher Education 14 (2), 26–29.
Trist, E. L. (1978). ‘On sociotechnical systems’, in Pasmore, W. A. (ed.), Sociotechnical Systems: A Sourcebook. La Jolla: University Associates, Inc., pp. 43–57.
Yin, R. K. (1989). Case Study Research. Newburg Park: Sage Publications, Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fu, H. A comparative study of planning capability and capacity in Chinese and Western higher education institutions. High Educ 22, 371–384 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137031
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137031