Abstract
A class of 1st-year medical students was divided into a control group who performed a laboratory experiment for themselves, and an experimental group who were given a demonstrationdata interpretation exercise. Prior to the practical session the experimental group were given a programmed text covering the underlying theoretical principles, to use in their private study. The control group were instructed to do their private study in the usual way using only their lecture notes and textbooks. Prior knowledge and the gain resulting from practical instruction were assessed using pre- and post-tests.
The conventional laboratory method was ineffective and did not facilitate conceptual understanding. The post-test performance and gain of the experimental group was significantly better than that of the control group, but this result did not appear to be dependent upon greater prior knowledge. The pretest performance of both treatment groups revealed that many students were inadequately prepared for the practical exercise. Many students did not appear to study the programmed text conscientiously, probably because they were accustomed to the traditional method of teaching and adopted a surface, reproductive approach to all learning. Furthermore, the students had difficulty linking their prior knowledge to the experiment, suggesting the need for pre-laboratory exercises designed to achieve closer integration between theory and experimentation.
It is clear that in order to achieve more meaningful learning there is a need for the students to change their attitudes and approaches to learning and for active, student-centred teaching-learning experiences to be incorporated into the curriculum.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beard, R. M., Bligh, D. A. & Harding, A. G., eds. (1978). Research into Teaching Methods in Higher Education (4th ed.). Research into Higher Education Monographs, S.R.H.E. Guildford, Surrey.
Boud, D., Dunn., J. & Hegarty-Hazel, E. (1986). Teaching in Laboratories. S.R.H.E. & NFER-NELSON, Guildford, Surrey.
Gagné, R. M. (1963). The learning requirements for enquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1: 144–153.
H.E.L.P. (1977). Practical Work in Undergraduate Science. Higher Education Learning Project (Physics), Heinemann, London.
Kirschner, P. A. & Meester, M. A. M. (1988). The laboratory in higher science education: problems, premises and objectives. Higher Education 17: 81–89.
Moreira, M. A. (1980). A non-traditional approach to the evaluation of laboratory instruction in general physics courses. European Journal of Science Education 2: 441–448.
Novak, J. D. (1979). Applying psychology and philosophy to the improvement of laboratory teaching. American Biology Teacher 41: 466–470, 474.
Reif, F. & St. John, M. (1979). Teaching physics thinking skills in the laboratory. American Journal of Physics 47: 950–957.
Tan, C. M. (1988). The effectiveness of alternative instructional media in physiology practical teaching. Medical Teacher 10: 333–344.
Tan, C. M., Asmawi, M. Z. & Yusof, A. P. M. (1989). The influence of instructional media in physiology practical teaching on students' conceptual understanding. Journal of Educational Television 15: 87–96.
Zubir, R. (1988). Descriptions of teaching and learning: a Malaysian perspective. Studies in Higher Education 13: 139–149.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tan, C.M. Some factors influencing student performance in laboratory experimental work in physiology with implications for curriculum deliberations and instructional design. High Educ 19, 473–479 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137009
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137009