Skip to main content
Log in

Management education and the challenge of action learning

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The phenomenal growth of management education in the last two decades has been accompanied by much controversy. Critics consider that business schools tend to concentrate on theory and on quantitative analysis, while neglecting interpersonal relationships and qualitative thinking. It is often stated that management education should be experience-based, active, problem oriented and modified by feedback. The extent to which Action Learning meets these criteria is discussed in this paper. The difference between Action Learning and other types of management education is stressed.

Attention is drawn to Action Learning programmes that have been conducted in Belgium, in the United Kingdom and in Australia.

Various difficulties that may be encountered in introducing Action Learning to management schools are described and some strategies for overcoming these difficulties are suggested.

The paper mentions problems connected with evaluating Action Learning programmes and suggests that Action Learning may be useful in management education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, J. and Cox, C. (1980), Advances in Management Education. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J.N. and Levin, R.I. (1984), Are business schools doing their Job?, Harvard Business Review 1, 140–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddy, D. (1980), Some issues in the design of Action Learning programmes, in Beck, J. and Cox, C. (1980), Advances in Management Education. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, C. (1979), Action Learning and public administration: recent trends from Britain, Politics 14(1), 97–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, D. and Pearce, D. (eds) (1977), More Than Management Development. Farnborough: Amacom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, F.E. (1967), A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, P. (1982), A Study of the Practical Use of the M.B.A. Windsor: British Institute of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foy, N. (1977), Action Learning comes to industry, Harvard Business Review, September–October, 158–168.

  • Foy, N. (1978), The Missing Links: British Management Education in the Eighties. Oxford Foundation for Management Education.

  • Garratt, B. (1977), Don't call me teacher, in Casey, D. and Pearce, D. (eds) More Than Management Development. Farnborough: Amacom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R.V. (1978), Organizational change in a public bureaucracy through a staff development programme, Human Resource Management Australia, Summer, 26–34.

  • Hayes, R.H. and Abernathy, W.J. (1980), Managing our way to economic decline, Harvard Business Review, July–August, 67–77.

  • Inquiry into Management Education Report (1982), Chairman J.T. Ralph, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, R.K. (1984). Environmental education at Kansas State University, in Knowles, M.S. and Associates, Andragogy in Action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, L. (1977), Evaluation of Training: A Study in the Irish Public Service. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M.S. (1978), The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species. Houston: Gulf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M.S. and Associates (1984), Andragogy in Action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D.A., Rubin, I.M. and McIntyre, J.M. (1984), Organizational Psychology. Fourth edition, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawlor, A. (1983), The components of Action Learning, in Pedler, M. (ed) Action Learning in Practice. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, H.J. (1972), Managerial Psychology. Third edition, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A. and Marsh, W. (1987), Action Learning: the development of field managers in the Prudential Assurance company, Journal of Management Development U.K. 6, 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limerick, D., Cunnington, B. and Trevor-Roberts, B. (1984), Frontiers of Excellence. Brisbane: Australian Institute of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, T. (1983), Management and the Social Sciences. Third edition, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, J. (1975), The manager's job: Folklore and fact, Harvard Business Review, July–August, 19–61.

  • MacNamara, M. and Weekes, W.H. (1982), The Action Learning model of experiential learning for developing managers, Human Relations 35 (10), 879–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNamara, M. (1985), Action Learning and organizational development, Organizational Development Journal 3 (2), 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNulty, N.G. (1979). Management Development by Action Learning, Training and Development Journal 33, 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. and Johansson J. (1985). Japanese management: what about the ‘hard’ skills?, Academy of Management Review 10 (2), 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, T. (1971), Business School Programmes: The Requirements of British Manufacturing Industry. London: British Institute of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedler, M. (ed) (1983), Action Learning in Practice. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T.J. and Waterman, R.H. (1982). In Search of Excellence. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C. and Euler, T. (1985), Experiental learning and management education, Higher Education Research and Development 4 (2), 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, J. (1983), Action Learning on an academic course, in Pedler, M. (ed) Action Learning in Practice. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Postgraduate Education for Management (1970). Canberra: AGPS.

  • Revans, R.W. (1971), Developing Effective Managers. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revans, R.W. (1976), Management education: time for a rethink, Personnel Management, July, 8 (7), 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revans, R.W. (1976), Action learning — a management development programme, Personnel Review, 1, 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revans, R.W. (1980), Action Learning. London: Blond and Briggs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revans, R.W. (1983), Action Learning, its terms and characters, M.D., 21, 1, 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seekings, D. (1987), Allied Irish Bank in Britain: organisational and business development through Action Learning, Leadership and Organization Development 8 (5), 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, H.E. (1985), Ego-state reframing as a tool in staff development, Higher Education Research and Development 4(2), 175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weekes, W.H. (1980), Action Learning: an open system approach to management education, Human Resource Management Australia 18 (3), 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacNamara, M., Meyler, M. & Arnold, A. Management education and the challenge of action learning. High Educ 19, 419–433 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137006

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137006

Keywords

Navigation