Abstract
Undergraduate job values have been reported as reflecting both the sex and social origins of the student. The present study assesses whether such differences are of any occupational significance. Ratings on 30 job attributes were collected from 310 final year undergraduates at universities and colleges throughout Britain. The four factors extracted from these ratings were then related to the job held at 26 years. Although the proportions of men and women differed between jobs, this difference was adequately explained by the job values reported by the students before graduation. There was no evidence that women had different values (at college) than men who were, at 26, to do a similar type of job. The origins of sex and social class differences in students' values are explored and it is concluded that there is a need for a new approach to careers education for the highly intelligent student of limited aspiration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Department of Employment (1974). Employment Prospects for the Highly Qualified. Manpower Papers No. 8, London: H.M.S.O.
Douglas, J. W. B. (1964). The Home and the School. London: MacGibbon and Kee.
Douglas, J. W. B., Ross, J. M. and Simpson, H. R. (1968). All Our Future. London: Peter Davies.
Greenaway, H. and Williams, G. (1973). Patterns of Change in Graduate Employment. London Society for Research into Higher Education.
Kelsall, R. K., Poole, A. and Kuhn, A. (1972). Graduates: The Sociology of an Elite. London: Methuen.
Miller, K. M. (1968). Manual for the Rothwell-Miller Interest Blank. London: National Foundation for Educational Research.
Morton-Williams, R., Finch, S. and Poll, C. (1966). Undergraduates' Attitudes to School Teaching as a Career. The Social Survey, London: H.M.S.O.
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1970). Classification of Occupations. London: H.M.S.O.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cherry, N. Occupational values and employment: A follow-up study of graduate men and women. High Educ 4, 357–368 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136902
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136902