Abstract
The debate about recurrent education is still for the most part at an unsophisticated level. This note suggests that whatever the problems of recurrent education in general it is likely to be particularly attractive to women returning to work after their childrearing is finished.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Coombs, P. H. (1968). The World Educational Crisis. Oxford University Press.
Drucker, P. F. (1969). The Age of Discontinuity. London: Heinemann.
Mishan, E. J. (1967). The Costs of Economic Growth. London: Staples Press.
OECD/CERI (1972). Clarifying Report on Recurrent Education. Paris: OECD. (forthcoming)
Fogarty, M., Rapoport, Rhona and Robert (1971). Sex, Career and Family. London: P.E.P.
Psacharopoulos, G. (1972). The Returns to Education: An International Comparison. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the OECD.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schade, G. Notes on recurrent education for women. High Educ 1, 477–481 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136807
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136807