Abstract
The constraints on the different fitting parameters used in the water-retention equations of Brooks and Corey, Brutsaert, and Van Genuchten are analyzed. It is shown that in the dry part of the h(θ) curve all three equations might break down for clay soils when the fitting parameters are calculated by a best fit over observed field data. In that case, application of the h(θ) equations for water transfer dealing with the very dry parts of the water retention curve can lead to erroneous results and must be limited to the range of water contents of the original data set.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brooks, R. H. and Corey, A. T., 1964, Hydraulic properties of porous media, Hydrology paper 3, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins.
Brutsaert, W., 1966, Probability laws of pore-size distributions, Soil Sci. 101, 85–92.
Brutsaert, W., 1974, More on an approximate solution for nonlinear diffusion, Water Resour. Res. 10, 1251–1252.
Brutsaert, W., 1976, The concise formulation of diffusive sorption of water in a dry soil, Water Resour. Res. 12, 1118–1124.
Moore, E. R., 1939, Water conduction from shallow water tables, Hilgardia 12 (6), 383–426.
Mualem, Y., 1976, A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media, Water Resour. Res. 12 (3), 513–522.
Rajkai, K., A method for calculating the capillary conductivity of the soil on the bases of the water retention curve, Hungarian J. Soil Sci. Agrochem. 33, 50–60.
Van Genuchten, M. Th., 1980, A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 44, 892–898.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fuentes, C., Haverkamp, R., Parlange, J.Y. et al. Constraints on parameters in three soil-water capillary retention equations. Transp Porous Med 6, 445–449 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136351
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136351