Skip to main content
Log in

Public budgets and public capital in boom towns

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Local governments are subject to severe stress in periods of rapid change such as boom town growth - a common problem of both rural and urban towns in the sunbelt. We quantify this stress by measuring, with an econometric model, the budget deficits and the inadequacy of public facilities resulting from growth. The model emphasizes capital adjustment costs and bureaucratic inertia which slow the response of government budgets to the changing demands of their citizens. The efficacy of existing intergovernmental aid programs and other policies in mitigating growth-related problems is evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht, Stan L. (1982). “Commentary,” Pacific Sociological Review 25: 275–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, Robert J. (1973). “The control of politicians: An economic model,” Public Choice 14: 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, Bruce and Steven Shwiff (1982). “The appropriation of rents by boomtown governments,” Economic Inquiry 20: 84–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, Theodore C. and Robert P. Goodman (1973). “Private demand for public goods,” American Economic Review 63: 280–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, Ernest R. and N. Eugene Savin (1975). “Estimation and hypothesis testing in singular equation systems with autoregressive disturbances,” Econometrica 43: 937–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookshire, David S. and Ralph C. d'Arge (1970). “Adjustment issues of impacted communities, or are boom towns bad?” Natural Resources Journal, July, pp. 523–546.

  • Crecine, John P. (1969). Government Problem-Solving: A Computer Simulation of Municipal Budgeting. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, Ronald G. and Arthur F. Mehr (1977). “Investment for urban infrastructure in boom towns,” Natural Resources Journal, April, pp. 223–240.

  • Cummings, Ronald G. and William D. Schulze (1978). “Optimal investment strategy for boom towns: A theoretical analysis,” American Economic Review 68: 374–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, Judith A. and Joseph Davenport (eds.) (1979). Boom Towns and Human Services. Department of Social Work, University of Wyoming, Laramie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, Robert R. (1978). “A demand model for the local public sector” Review of Economics and Statistics 45: 184–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, James (1970). “Testing for serial correlation in least-squares regressions when some of the regressors are lagged dependent variables,” Econometrica 38: 410–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filimon, Radu, Thomas Romer and Howard Rosenthal (1982). “Asymmetric information and agenda control: The bases of monopoly power in public spending,” Journal of Public Economics 17: 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman, Robert P. (1979). “The fiscal performance of local governments: An interpetive review,” in: Peter Mieszkowski and Mahlon Straszheim (eds.), Current Issues in Urban Economics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 270–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Roger D. (1983). “An anlysis of state engergy impact mitigation programs in Colorado, Utah, Montana and Wyoming,” Journal of Energy Law and Policy 3: 281–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, Martin (1975). “An econometric model of federal grants and fiscal responses,” in: Wallace E. Oates (ed.), Financing the New Federalism. Washington: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myler, Glade A. (1982). “Mitigating boom town effects of energy development: A survey,” Journal of Energy Law and Policy 2: 211–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerlove, Marc (1971), “Further evidence on the estimation of dynamic economic relations from a time series of cross sections,” Econometrica 39: 359–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, William (1975). “Bureaucrats and politicians,” Journal of Law and Economics 18: 617–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pommerehne, Wehner W. (1978). “Institutional approaches to public expenditure: Empirical evidence from Swiss municipalities,” Journal of Public Economics 9: 255–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, Thomas and Howard Rosenthal (1979). “The elusive median voter,” Journal of Public Economics 12: 143–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, Henri (1975). Theory and Measurement of Consumer Demand. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, T. D. and Ashiq Hussain (1969). “The use of error components models in combining cross section with time series data,” Econometrica 37: 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, Aaron (1975). Budgeting: A Comparative Study of Budgetary Processes. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, Kenneth P., et al. (1982). “Local social disruption and Western energy development: A critical review,” Pacific Sociological Review 25: 275–296.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kiefer, D., Miller, J. Public budgets and public capital in boom towns. Policy Sci 16, 349–369 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135954

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135954

Keywords

Navigation