Abstract
The responses of municipal governments to declining real revenue are used to conduct a critical test of three theories of budgetary decisionmaking. Contrary to the expectations generated by the bureaucratic process theory, there is little evidence of the application of any budget cutting algorithm based on stable account priorities. Contrary to the expectations generated by the interest group politics model, there is equally little evidence of across-the-board cuts. The results are, however, broadly consistent with what we have termed the managerial theory which emphasizes the relative “controllability” of expenditure categories, transient decisionmaker preferences, and the stochastic impact of short-term expenditure solutions. The difficulties associated with the conduct of critical tests in this area are also discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Crecine, John P. (1969). Governmental Problem-Solving: A Computer Simulation of Municipal Budgeting. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Crecine, John P. (1970). “A simulation of municipal budgeting: The impact of problem environments,” In Ira Sharkowsky (ed.), Policy Analysis in Political Science. Chicago: Markham.
Cyert, Richard M. and March, James G. (1963). A Behavïoral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Dahl, Robert A. (1967). Pluralist Democracy in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Davis, Otto, Dempster, Alan and Wildavsky, Aaron (1966). “A theory of the budgetary process,” American Political Science Review 60: 529–547.
Dempster, M. A. H. and Wildavsky, Aaron (1979). “On change: or, there is no magic size for an increment,” Political Studies 29: 371–389.
Gist, John R. (1974). Mandatory Expenditures and the Defense Sector. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Gerwin, Donald A. (1969). Budgeting Public Funds: The Decision Process in an Urban School District. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Kendall, Maurice and Stuart, Alan (1977). The Advanced Theory of Statistics: Volume 1, New York: MacMillan.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1965). “Logic of discovery or psychology of research?” In Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakatos, Imre (1965). “Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes,” In Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Larkey, Patrick D. (1979). Evaluating Public Programs. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
LeLoup, Lance (1978). “The myth of incrementalism: Analytic choices in budgetary theory,” Polity 10: 488–509.
Lindblom, Charles (1959). “The science of muddling through,” Public Administration Review 19: 79–88.
Menchik, Mark, Fernandez, Judith and Caggiano, Michael (1982). “How Fiscal Restraint Affects Spending and Services in Cities.” Rand Corporation Research Report R-2644-FF/ RC.
Mohr, Lawrence B. (1982). Explaining Organizational Behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Padgett, John (1980). “Bounded rationality in budgetary research,” American Political Science Review 74: 354–372.
Popper, Karl (1959). “Testability and ‘ad-hocness’ of the Contraction Hypothesis,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10: 50–72.
Popper, Karl (1968). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper & Row.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The Semi-Sovreign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Schulman, Paul R. (1975). “Nonincremental policymaking: Notes toward an alternative paradigm,” American Political Science Review 69: 1354–1370.
Searle, S. R. (1971). Linear Models. New York: John Wiley.
Simon, Herbert A. (1945). Administrative Behavior. New York: MacMillan.
Simon, Herbert A. (1955). “A behavioral model of rational choice,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 69: 99–118.
Truman, David B. (1951). The Governmental Process. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Wanat, John (1974). “Bases of budgetary incrementalism,” American Political Science Review 68: 1221–1228.
Wildavsky, Aaron (1964). The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by NSF grant DAR 80-11208.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Downs, G.W., Rocke, D.M. Theories of budgetary decisionmaking and revenue decline. Policy Sci 16, 329–347 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135953
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135953