Abstract
Both politicians and regulatory agencies are frequently forced to make tradeoffs among competing objectives. When these tradeoffs are highly sensitive, as in the case of jobs and environmental quality, they are rarely made explicitly. This paper takes on the task of uncovering the nature tradeoffs among jobs, economic growth and environmental quality. A case study of Wisconsin's innovative attempt for dealing with its air pollution problems provides important insights into why particular policy instruments are selected in balancing economic and environmental objectives. In line with observations of previous authors, the analysis reveals that there is a marked tendency for the political process to resist market mechanisms for rationing scarce environmental resources. In addition to providing a rationale and evaluation of the specific policy being developed by Wisconsin, the paper develops two testable hypotheses regarding the general selection of instruments for making tradeoffs among jobs and environmental quality.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
David, M. and Joeres, E. (1983), ‘Is a Viable Implementation of TDPs Transferable?’, in: E. Joeres and M. David (eds.), Buying a Better Environment: Cost-Effective Regulation Through Permit Trading. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 233–248.
Ferejohn, J. (1974), Pork Barrel Politics. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Hahn, R. (1981), ‘An Assessment of the Determination of Energy Needs: The Case of Nuclear Power’, Policy Sciences 13: 9–24.
Hahn, R. (1986), ‘Regulatory Reform at EPA: Separating Fact from Illusion’, Yale Journal on Regulation 4: 173–183.
Hahn, R. and Hester, G. (1986), ‘Where Did All the Markets Go?: An Analysis of EPA's Emission Trading Program’, working Paper 87–3, School of Urban and Public Affairs, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, presented at the 1986 AEA meetings, forthcoming in the Yale Journal on Regulation.
Hahn, R., McRae, G. and Milford, J. (1986). ‘Coping with Complexity in Environmental Policy Design’, Working Paper 87–16, School of Urban and Public Affairs, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, presented at the 1985 American Economic Association Meetings.
Kelman, S. (1981), What Price Incentives?; Economists and the Environment. Boston, Massachusetts: Auburn House.
Krier, J. (1974), ‘The Irrational National Air Quality Standards: Macro- and Micro-Mistakes’, U.C.L.A. Law Review 22: 323.
Levine, M. (1987), ‘Airline Competition in Deregulated Markets: Theory, Firm Strategy and Public Policy’, Yale Journal on Regulation 4: 393–494.
Liroff, R. (1986), Reforming Air Pollution Regulation: The Toil and Trouble of EPA's Bubble. Washington, D.C.: The Conservation Foundation.
Magat, W., Krupnick, A. and Harrington, W. (1986), Rules in the Making: A Statistical Analysis of Regulatory Agency Behavior. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
Mayhew, D. (1974), Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
McCubbins, M. and Page, T. (1986), ‘The Congressional Foundations of Agency Performance’, Public Choice 51: 173–190.
McRae, G., Goodin, W. and Seinfeld, J. (1982), Mathematical Modelling of Photochemical Air Pollution, EQL Report No. 18. Pasadena, California: Environmental Quality Laboratory, California Institute of Technology.
Mendeloff, J. (1988), The Dilemma of Toxic Substance Regulation: How Overregulation Causes Underregulation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, in press.
Repetto, R. (1987), ‘The Policy Implications of Non-Convex Environmental Damages: A Smog Control Case Study’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14: 13–29.
Rickun, J. (1987), personal correspondence, Chief, Air Impact Analysis and Planning Section, Bureau of Air Management, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, March 27.
Rolph, E. (1983), ‘Government Allocation of Property Rights: Who Gets What?’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 3: 45–61.
Thomas, L. (1987), ‘Testimony of Lee M. Thomas’, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency before the Subcommittee on Health and the Environment, Committee on Energy and Commerce, United States House of Representatives, February 19.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1987), ‘Fact Sheet: The Ozone Nonattainment Problem’, February.
Weingast, B. (1981), ‘Regulation, Reregulation, and Deregulation: The Political Foundations of Agency Clientele Relationships’, Law and Contemporary Problems 44: 147–177.
Welch, W. (1983), ‘The Political Feasibility of Full Ownership Property Rights: The Cases of Pollution and Fisheries’, Policy Sciences 16: 165–180.
Wisconsin Department of Development (1986), (cited as DOD Report), Division of Policy Development, Bureau of Research, ‘Ozone Air Quality Management and Economic Development in Southeastern Wisconsin’, Report RP-86-8. October.
Wisconsin Legislative Council Staff, (1987), ‘Environmental Resource Management: VOC Accommodation and Replenishment’, Draft Legislation, March 11, 18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hahn, R.W. Jobs and environmental quality: some implications for instrument choice. Policy Sci 20, 289–306 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135868
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135868