Skip to main content
Log in

Modest modifications and structural stability: higher education in Ontario

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Policy change in Ontario higher education in the 1960s resulted in a series of structures designed to co-ordinate each of the two sectors in this binary system. Recent government initiatives may be characterized as attempts to initiate or stimulate change within the boundaries and constraints associated with a structure which has been relatively stable for twenty years. There has been some increase in regulation in the university sector through the establishment of targeted funding mechanisms, programme appraisal and approval mechanisms, and the government's legislated monopoly over degree-granting, but these changes have had little impact on the basic operations of the universities. Government initiatives in the community college sector have had some impact in terms of greater institutional differentiation, but little impact on institution stratification. The stability of the Ontario system can be attributed to the relative homogeneity of each of two clearly differentiated sectors, the limited role of the federal government in the policy arena, a structure which has deflected or rejected calls for structural change, and the failure of those who seek change to stimulate a public or political debate on higher education policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrod, P. (1982). Scholars and Dollars: Politics, Economics, and the Universities of Ontario 1945–1980. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. (1990). ‘Using matching grants to facilitate corporate-university research linkages: a preliminary examination of outcomes from one initiative’, Canadian Journal of Higher Education 20(1), 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.R. (1983). The Higher Education System. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on the Future Development of the Universities of Ontario (1984). Ontario Universities: Options and Futures. Toronto: The Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Future Role of the Universities in Ontario (1981). The Report. Toronto: The Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, G.E. (1987). University of Toronto Renewal - 1987. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Finance Officers, Universities of Ontario (1989). A Decade of Financial Information: Ontario Universities 1978–79 to 1987–88. Toronto: Council of Ontario Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennison, J.D. and Gallagher, P. (1986). Canada's Community Colleges, A Critical Analysis. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandz, J. (1988). The Report of the Colleges Collective Bargaining Commission. Toronto: Colleges Collective Bargaining Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, J.N. (1984). ‘The educational role of the Federal Government’, in Winchester, I. (ed.), The Independence of the University and the Funding of the State: Essays on Academic Freedom in Canada. Toronto: OISE Press, pp. 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, P.M. (1980). Canadian Universities 1980 and Beyond: Enrolment, Structural Change and Finance. Ottawa: Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, R.A. (1989). ‘College-university transfer arrangements existing in Ontario (questionnaire results)’, in Colleges and the Educational Spectrum: Colleges and Universities (Vision 2000 Background Papers). Toronto: Ontario Council of Regents.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Council on University Affairs (1988). Fourteenth Annual Report 1987–88. Toronto: Ontario Council on University Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnik, M.L. (1987). ‘State control of degree granting: the establishment of a public monopoly in Canada’, in Watson, C. (ed.), Governments and Higher Education - The Legitimacy of Intervention. Toronto: Higher Education Group, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, pp. 56–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnik, M.L. (1989). ‘How academic program review can foster intellectual conformity and stifle diversity of thought and method in the university’, Journal of Higher Education 60(6), 619–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnik, M.L. and Jones, G.A. (in press). ‘Arrangements for coordination between university and college sectors in Canadian provinces’, Canadian Journal of Higher Education.

  • Smith, R.H.T. (1990). ‘Higher education in the public policy agenda: hard federalism and soft federalism’. Keynote address at the annual conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Higher Education, Victoria, British Columbia. June 3.

  • Statistics Canada (1989). Education in Canada, A Statistical Review for 1987–88. Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services. Cat. 81–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, J.O. (1988). The Report of the External Advisor to the Minister of Colleges and Universities on the Future Role and Function of the Ontario Council on University Affairs and Its Academic Advisory Committee. Peterborough, Ontario: External Advisor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripartite Committee on Interprovincial Comparisons (1989). Interprovincial Comparisons of University Financing - Ninth Report of the Tripartite Committee on Interprovincial Comparisons. Toronto: Ontario Council on University Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vision 2000 (1990a). ‘The college system - an empirical snapshot’, in Empirical Features of the College System (Vision 2000 Background Papers). Toronto: Ontario Council of Regents.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vision 2000 (1990b). Vision 2000: Quality and Opportunity. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, L.A.K. (1987). ‘Graduate studies in Ontario: the role of the universities and the role of government’, in Watson, C. (ed.), Governments and Higher Education - The Legitimacy of Intervention. Toronto: Higher Education Group, Ontario institute for Studies in Education, pp. 84–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, G.A. Modest modifications and structural stability: higher education in Ontario. High Educ 21, 573–587 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134989

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134989

Keywords

Navigation