Abstract
According to the original Ellsberg (1961) examples there is uncertainty version if the decision maker prefers to bet on an urn of known composition rather than on an urn of unknown composition. According to another definition (Schmeidler, 1989), there is uncertainty aversion if any convex combination of two acts is preferred to the least favorable of these acts. We show that these two definitions differ: while the first one truly refers to uncertainty aversion, the second one refers to aversion to increasing uncertainty. Besides, with reference to Choquet Expected Utility theory, uncertainty aversion means that there exists the core of a capacity, while aversion to increasing uncertainty means that the capacity is convex. Consequently, aversion to increasing uncertainty implies uncertainty aversion, but the opposite does not hold. We also show that a completely analogous situation holds for the case of risk and we define a set of risk and uncertainty premiums according to the previous analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ellsberg, D.: 1961, ‘Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms’,Quarterly Journal of Economics 75, 643–669.
Hilton, R.W.: 1988, ‘Risk attitude under two alternative theories of choice under risk’,Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 9, 119–136.
Knight, F.H.: 1921,Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Montesano, A.: 1988, ‘The risk aversion measure without the independence axiom’,Theory and Decision 24, 269–288.
Montesano, A.: 1991, ‘Measures of risk aversion with expected and nonexpected utility’,Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 4, 271–283.
Montesano, A.: 1994, ‘Non-additive probabilities and the measure of uncertainty and risk aversion: A proposal’. In Munier, B. and Machina, M.J. (Eds.): 1994Models and Experiments in Risk and Rationality, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 59–74.
Pratt, J.W.: 1964, ‘Risk aversion in the small and the large’,Econometrica 32, 122–136.
Savage, L.J.: 1954,The Foundations of Statistics, Wiley, New York.
Schmeidler, D.: 1969, ‘The nucleolus of a characteristic function game’,SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 17, 1163–1170.
Schmeidler, D.: 1989, Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity,Econometrica 57, 571–587.
Segal, U. and Spivak, A.: 1990, ‘First order versus second order risk aversion’,Journal of Economic Theory 51, 111–125.
Shapley, L.S.: 1971, ‘Cores of convex games’,International Journal of Game Theory 1, 11–26.
Wakker, P.P.: 1990, ‘Under stochastic dominance choquet-expected utility and anticipated utility are identical’,Theory and Decision 29, 119–132.
Wakker, P.P.: 1994, ‘Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion’,Theory and Decision 36, 1–44.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Montesano, A., Giovannoni, F. Uncertainty aversion and aversion to increasing uncertainty. Theor Decis 41, 133–148 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134639
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134639