Skip to main content
Log in

Cross-subsidization in telecommunications: Beyond the universal service fairy tale

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For many years, regulatory policy in the telecommunications industry has been strongly influenced by the belief that the traditional system of cross-subsidizing local rates by long distance has served to promote the goal of universal service. In this paper, we examine both the theoretical and empirical support for this widely accepted relationship and find it wanting in each. The results indicate that the cross-subsidization mechanism bears no causal relationship to the policy goal of universal service. Instead, both the subsidy levels and subscription rates appear to be determined by other economic variables, such as those suggested by the economic theory of regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amemiya, T. 1976. “The Maximum Likelihood, the Minimum Chi-Square and the Nonlinear Weighted Least Squares in the General Qualitative Response Model”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 71 (June): 347–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • AT&T Communications. 1984 and 1985. Internal documents.

  • Belsley, D.A., E. Kuh, and R.E. Welsch. 1980. Regression Diagnostics:Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braeutigam, R. 1980. “An Analysis of Fully Distributed Cost Pricing in Regulated Industries”. Bell Journal of Economics 11(1): 182–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, Paul E. and James M. MacDonald. 1989. “Telephone Pricing Structures: The Effects on Universal Service.” Paper presented at the Eighth Annual Conference of the Advanced Workship in Regulation and Public Utility Economics, Newport, Rhode Island, (May).

  • Congressional Budget Office. 1984. The Changing Telephone Industry: Access Charges, Universal Service, and Local Rates. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, Michael A. and Paul R. Kleindorfer. 1986. The Economics of Public Utility Regulation. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 2X5: The MacMillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Lewis and Steven Garber. 1988. “Public Utility Regulators are Only Human: A Positive Theory of Rational Constraints”. American Economic Review 78 (June): 444–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulhaber, Gerald. 1975. “Cross-Subsidization: Pricing in Public Enterprises”. American Economic Review 65 (December): 966–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulhaber, Gerald. 1987. Telecommunication in Turmoil:Technology and Public Policy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Communications Commission. 1988. Monitoring Report CC Docket No. 87–339. Washington, D.C.: FCC (March).

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, James. 1982. “The Welfare Implications of Externalities and Price Elasticities for Telecommunications Pricing”. The Review of Economics and Statistics 64 (February): 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. A. 1978. “Specification Tests in Econometrics”. Econometrica 46 (November): 1251–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Leland L. 1988. Telephone Assistance Programs for Low-Income Households: A Preliminary Assessment. Santa Monica: The Rand Corporation (February).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, Paul. 1974. “Inflation and Environmental Concerns: Structural Change in the Process of Public Utility Regulation”. Journal of Law and Economics 17 (October): 291–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Alfred E. 1984. “The Road to More Intelligent Telephone Pricing”. Yale Journal on Regulation 1(2): 139–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Alfred E. 1988. The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institutions. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaserman, David L. and John W. Mayo. 1988. “Long-distance Telecommunications Policy—Rationality on Hold”. Public Utilities Fortnightly 122(13): 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leggette, James A. 1986. “Separations and Telecommunications Pricing Issues”. In Telecommunications in the Post-Divestiture Era, edited by A. Daniels and D. Kamershen. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Bridger. 1978. “Optimal Pricing of Local Telephone Service”. American Economic Review 68 (September): 517–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners. 1986. Bell Operating Companies' Exchange Service Telephone Rates. Washington, D.C.: NARUC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, Sam. 1976. “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation”. Journal of Law and Economics 19 (August): 211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perl, Lewis. 1983. Residential Demand for Telephone Service. National Economic Research Associates, Inc.

  • Posner, Richard A. 1971. “Taxation by Regulation”. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 (Spring): 22–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Richard A. 1974. “Theories of Economic Regulation”. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 5 (Autumn): 335–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, J.B. 1969. “Tests for Specification Errors in Classic Linear Least Squares Regression Analysis”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B. 31: 350–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, J. B. and P. Schmidt P. 1976. “Some Further Results on the Use of OLS and BLUS Residuals in Specification Error Tests”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 71 (June): 389–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rholfs, Jeffrey. 1979. “Economically Efficient Bell System Pricing.” Bell Laboratories Discussion Paper.

  • Stigler, George. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation”. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 (Spring): 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, George. 1982. “An Analysis of Fully Distributed Cost Pricing Applied to Partially Regulated Firms”. Bell Journal of Economics 13(2): 525–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Lester. 1980a. Telecommunications Demand: A Survey and Critique. Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1980a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Lester. 1980b. “The Demand for Telecommunications: A Nontechnical Exposition”. In Issues in Public-Utility Pricing and Regulation, edited by Michael Crew. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce. 1985. Statistical Abstract of the United States 1985. Washington, D.C.: USGPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce. Survey of Current Business 68(4): 75.

  • Vietor, Richard and Dekkers Davidson. 1985. “Economics and Politics of Deregulation: The Issue of Telephone Access Charges”. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 5: 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, Barry R. and Mark J. Moran. 1983. “Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission”. Journal of Political Economy 91 (October): 765–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenders, John T. 1987. The Economics of Telecommunications: Theory and Policy. Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaserman, D.L., Mayo, J.W. & Flynn, J.E. Cross-subsidization in telecommunications: Beyond the universal service fairy tale. J Regul Econ 2, 231–249 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134062

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134062

Keywords

Navigation